scholarly journals Resident Involvement in Hip Arthroscopy Procedures Does Not Affect Short-Term Surgical Outcomes

Author(s):  
Connor R. Crutchfield ◽  
Jack R. Zhong ◽  
Nathan J. Lee ◽  
David P. Trofa ◽  
T. Sean Lynch
2017 ◽  
Vol 139 (6) ◽  
pp. 1325-1334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad E. Sebai ◽  
Ricardo J. Bello ◽  
Scott D. Lifchez ◽  
Damon S. Cooney ◽  
Gedge D. Rosson ◽  
...  

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiguo Li ◽  
Yan Ma ◽  
Guiting Liu ◽  
Ming Fang ◽  
Yingwei Xue

Abstract Objective Proximal gastrectomy acts as a function-preserving operation for upper-third gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term surgical outcomes between proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction and proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition reconstruction in upper-third gastric cancer. Methods A retrospective review of 301 patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition (JI) or gastric tube (GT) at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital between June 2007 and December 2016 was performed. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Visick grade were used to evaluate postgastrectomy syndromes. Gastrointestinal fiberoscopy was used to evaluate the prevalence and severity of reflux esophagitis based on the Los Angeles (LA) classification system. Results The JI group had a longer operation time than the GT group (220 ± 52 vs 182 ± 50 min), but no significant difference in blood loss was noted. Compared to the GT group, the Visick grade and GSRS score were significantly higher. Reflux esophagitis was significantly increased in the GT group compared with the JI group. Conclusion Proximal gastrectomy is well tolerated with excellent short-term outcomes in patients with upper-third gastric cancer. Compared with GT construction, JI construction has clear functional advantages and may provide better quality of life for patients with upper-third gastric cancer.


Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Bedaiwy ◽  
Mohamed Y. Abdel Rahman ◽  
Mark Chapman ◽  
Heidi Frasure ◽  
Sangeeta Mahajan ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. 602-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittany L. Vieira ◽  
David J. Hernandez ◽  
Charles Qin ◽  
Stephanie S. Smith ◽  
John Y. S. Kim ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melina Shoni ◽  
Taymaa May ◽  
Allison F. Vitonis ◽  
Anjelica Garza ◽  
Michael G. Muto ◽  
...  

Objective. To establish short-term surgical outcomes of three-port laparoscopic risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in women with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC). Methods. The medical records of all HBOC women that underwent laparoscopic RRSO between January 2001 and December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, operative details, and short-term surgical outcomes were obtained and subjected to SAS. Statistical univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results. 358 patients met study criteria with 277 (77.4%) carrying a documented BRCA mutation. The predominant technique utilized three ports (two 5 mm and one 10/12 mm), a 5 mm laparoscope and a 5 mm Ligasure pulsatile bipolar device. Mean operative time was 58.3 minutes (SD 22.6, 26.0–197.0), significantly affected by BMI greater than 30 (P<0.0001) and status of adhesions (P=0.001). Estimated blood loss (EBL) was negligible in 96.9% of cases. Seven patients required conversion to laparotomy. No major intraoperative complications were recorded. One-night hospital admission rate was less than 2.0% while postoperative complication rate was 3.1%. Malignancy was revealed in 14 patients (3.9%). Conclusion. In HBOC population, three-port laparoscopic RRSO is a simple, reproducible, and safe procedure with low conversion rate, short operative time, minimal EBL, low surgical morbidity, and rapid postoperative recovery.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 2969-2979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuei-Yen Tsai ◽  
Hsin-An Chen ◽  
Wan-Yu Wang ◽  
Ming-Te Huang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document