Long-Term Results After Repair of Type A Acute Aortic Dissection According to False Lumen Patency

2009 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 1244-1250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalil Fattouch ◽  
Roberta Sampognaro ◽  
Emiliano Navarra ◽  
Marco Caruso ◽  
Calogera Pisano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Acute Aortic Dissection ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Type A ◽  
Long Term Results

scholarly journals Natural courses and long-term results of type A acute aortic intramural haematoma and retrograde thrombosed type A acute aortic dissection: a single-centre experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-Yu Chen ◽  
Hsu-Ting Yen ◽  
Chien-Ming Lo ◽  
Chia-Chen Wu ◽  
David Kwan-Ru Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Medical Therapy ◽  
Acute Aortic Dissection ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Type A ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Urgent Surgery ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Thrombosed Type

Abstract OBJECTIVES Few reports on the outcomes of patients treated for Stanford type A acute aortic intramural haematoma (TAAIMH) and retrograde thrombosed type A acute aortic dissection exist. This study aimed to evaluate their long-term results and predictors of adverse outcomes. METHODS We retrospectively analysed 40 patients with TAAIMH and retrograde thrombosed type A acute aortic dissection. All patients underwent urgent surgery on presentation of life-threatening complications. Before discharge, 18 patients underwent open aortic surgery, and 22 were treated with medical therapy alone. Clinical features of these patients and image appearances were reviewed, and the relationship with overall survival, aortic events, and aortic death was investigated. RESULTS The in-hospital mortality rate was 4.5% (1 patient) with medical therapy alone and 11.1% (2 patients) with surgical intervention. No patient with initial medical therapy required urgent surgery for life-threatening complications beyond 3 days of admission. The overall survival and aortic death-free survival rates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 85.0%, 72.5% and 59.8% and 90.0%, 81.6% and 77.1%, respectively. TAAIMH associated with penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) was a risk factor of aortic events (P = 0.020) and significantly influenced aortic death-free survival (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Urgent surgery for complicated TAAIMH and retrograde thrombosed type A acute aortic dissection patients and initial medical therapy for uncomplicated patients show favourable long-term survival rates. TAAIMH is frequently associated with PAU; PAU enlargement is common. Although PAU can remain stable for years, it is a strong predictor of poor prognosis. For optimal long-term results, surgical repair is recommended for TAAIMH associated with PAU.

Cannulating a Dissecting Aorta Using Ultrasound-Epiaortic and Transesophageal Guidance

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saina Attaran ◽  
Maria Safar ◽  
Hesham Zayed Saleh ◽  
Mark Field ◽  
Manoj Kuduvalli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Bypass ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Acute Aortic Dissection ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Type A ◽  
Ascending Aorta ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Complete Rupture

<p>Management of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection remains a major surgical challenge. Directly cannulating the ascending aorta provides a rapid establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass but consists of risks such as complete rupture of the aorta, false lumen cannulation, subsequent malperfusion and propagation of the dissection.</p><p>We describe a technique of cannulating the ascending aorta in patients with acute aortic dissection that can be performed rapidly in hemodynamically unstable patients under ultrasound-epiaortic and transesophageal (TEE) guidance.</p>

OC20 EARLY AND LONG-TERM RESULTS OF LATE REOPERATION AFTER REPAIRED ACUTE TYPE A AORTIC DISSECTION

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. e2
Author(s):  
D. Piani ◽  
I. Vendramin ◽  
A. Lechiancole ◽  
V. Ferrara ◽  
M. Meneguzzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Type A ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection

scholarly journals Efficacy of entry exclusion strategy for DeBakey type III retrograde Stanford type A acute aortic dissection

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosuke Inoue ◽  
Hitoshi Matsuda ◽  
Jiro Matsuo ◽  
Takayuki Shijo ◽  
Atsushi Omura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Acute Aortic Dissection ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Type A ◽  
Frozen Elephant Trunk ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Descending Aorta ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Elephant Trunk Technique ◽  
Frozen Elephant Trunk Technique

Abstract OBJECTIVES Resection of a primary entry tear is essential for the treatment of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection (AAAD). In DeBakey type III retrograde AAAD (DBIII-RAAAD), resection of the primary entry tear in the descending aorta is sometimes difficult. The frozen elephant trunk technique and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) enable the closure of the primary entry in the descending aorta. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of resection or closure of primary entry, i.e. entry exclusion, in patients with DeBakey type III retrograde-AAAD. METHODS The medical records of 654 patients with AAAD who underwent emergency surgery between January 2000 and March 2019 were retrospectively reviewed, and 80 eligible patients with DeBakey type III retrograde-AAAD were divided into the excluded (n = 50; age, 62 ± 12 years) and residual (n = 30; age, 66 ± 14 years) groups according to postoperative computed tomography angiographic data of the false lumen around the primary entry. The excluded group was defined as having a postoperative false lumen at the level of the elephant trunk or thrombosis of the endograft including primary entry. Patients with early false lumen enhancement around the elephant trunk or an unresected primary entry tear after isolated hemiarch replacement were included in the residual group. The early and long-term surgical outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS The in-hospital mortality rate was 8% (6/80), with no significant difference observed between the excluded and the residual groups (10% and 7%, respectively; P &gt; 0.99). Ninety-five percentage of the patients (20/21) achieved entry exclusion with stent grafts including the frozen elephant trunk procedure and TEVAR. Spinal cord ischaemia was not observed in either group. The cumulative overall survival at 5 years was comparable between the 2 groups (76% and 81% in the excluded and residual groups, respectively; P = 0.93). The 5-year freedom from distal aortic reoperation rate was significantly higher in the excluded group (97%) than in the residual group (97% vs 66%; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Not only resection but also closure using the entry exclusion approach for DeBakey type III retrograde-AAAD utilizing new technologies including the frozen elephant trunk technique and TEVAR might mitigate dissection-related reoperations.

scholarly journals Strategy for Stanford Type A Acute Aortic Dissection with Thrombosed False Lumen of the Ascending Aorta.

2001 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 280-284
Author(s):  
Hidefumi Obo ◽  
Tsutomu Shida ◽  
Syuuichi Kozawa ◽  
Tatsurou Asada ◽  
Nobuhiko Mukohara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Acute Aortic Dissection ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Type A ◽  
Ascending Aorta

scholarly journals Florida Sleeve is a Safe and Effective Technique for Valve Salvage in Acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Alhussaini ◽  
Eric Jeng ◽  
Tomas Martin ◽  
Amber Filion ◽  
Thomas Beaver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Aortic Root ◽  
Type A ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Valve Sparing

Objective: Valve-sparing root replacement is commonly used for management of aortic root aneurysms in elective setting, but its technical complexity hinders its broader adoption for acute Type-A Aortic Dissection (ATAAD). The Florida Sleeve (FS) procedure is a simplified form of valve sparing aortic root reconstruction that does not require coronary reimplantation. Here, we present our outcomes of the Florida Sleeve (FS) repair in patients with dilated roots in the setting of an ATAAD. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 24 consecutive patients (2002-2018) treated with FS procedure for ATAAD. Demographic, operative, and postoperative outcomes were queried from our institutional database. Long term follow-up was obtained from clinic visits for local patients, and with telephone and telehealth measures otherwise. Results: Mean age was 49 ± 14 years with 19 (79%) males. Marfan syndrome was present in 4 (16.7%) patients and 14 (58.3) had ≥2+ aortic insufficiency (AI). Nine (37.2%) had preoperative mal-perfusion or shock. The FS was combined with hemi-arch replacement in 15 (62.5%) patients and a zone-2 arch replacement in 9 (37.5%) patients. There were 2 (8.3%) early postoperative mortalities. Median follow-up period was 46 months (range; 0.3-146). The median survival of the entire cohort was 143.4 months. One patient (4.2%) required redo aortic valve replacement for unrelated aortic valve endocarditis at 30 months postoperatively. Conclusion: FS is simplified and reproducible valve-sparing root repair. In appropriate patients, it can be applied safely in acute Stanford type-A aortic dissection with excellent early and long-term results.

scholarly journals Acute type A aortic dissection: long-term results and reoperations

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 389-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jos A. Bekkers ◽  
Goris Bol Raap ◽  
Johanna J.M. Takkenberg ◽  
Ad J.J.C. Bogers
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Type A ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document