Corrigendum to “Social brain development and the affective consequences of ostracism in adolescence” [Brain and Cognition 72(1) (2010) 134–145]

2013 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 92
Author(s):  
Catherine Sebastian ◽  
Essi Viding ◽  
Kipling D. Williams ◽  
Sarah-Jayne Blakemore
2010 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Sebastian ◽  
Essi Viding ◽  
Kipling D. Williams ◽  
Sarah-Jayne Blakemore

Author(s):  
Andrik I Becht ◽  
Lara M Wierenga ◽  
Kathryn L Mills ◽  
Rosa Meuwese ◽  
Anna van Duijvenvoorde ◽  
...  

Abstract We tested whether adolescents differ from each other in the structural development of the social brain and whether individual differences in social brain development predicted variability in friendship quality development. Adolescents (N = 299, Mage T1 = 13.98 years) were followed across three biannual waves. We analysed self-reported friendship quality with the best friend at T1 and T3, and bilateral measures of surface area and cortical thickness of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), temporoparietal junction (TPJ) and precuneus across all waves. At the group level, growth curve models confirmed non-linear decreases of surface area and cortical thickness in social brain regions. We identified substantial individual differences in levels and change rates of social brain regions, especially for surface area of the mPFC, pSTS and TPJ. Change rates of cortical thickness varied less between persons. Higher levels of mPFC surface area and cortical thickness predicted stronger increases in friendship quality over time. Moreover, faster cortical thinning of mPFC surface area predicted a stronger increase in friendship quality. Higher levels of TPJ cortical thickness predicted lower friendship quality. Together, our results indicate heterogeneity in social brain development and how this variability uniquely predicts friendship quality development.


2016 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 1952-1965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara R. Braams ◽  
Eveline A. Crone

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjolein Barendse ◽  
Jennifer H Pfeifer

Puberty is characterized by substantial change in many areas of development, including hormonal, physical, neuronal, psychological and social. In this chapter, we outline how puberty, and its underlying hormonal and physical changes, might elicit a sensitive period for the development of the social brain. The literature to date suggests that pubertal development is relevant for the structural development of the social brain, partly in interaction with sex. Functionally, puberty might render the brain more sensitive to social information. However, methodological issues relating to sample size, study design and analysis, limit the possibility of drawing more specific conclusions. Apart from overcoming these methodological problems, future research should focus on individual differences in pubertal processes and their relevance to social brain development, as well as examining the mechanisms from pubertal processes through social brain functioning to social behavior.


2009 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark H. Johnson ◽  
Tobias Grossmann ◽  
Kathrin Cohen Kadosh

2021 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-118
Author(s):  
Jack L. Andrews ◽  
Saz P. Ahmed ◽  
Sarah-Jayne Blakemore

Author(s):  
Marjolein E. A. Barendse ◽  
Jennifer H. Pfeifer

Puberty is characterized by substantial change in many areas of development, including hormonal, physical, neuronal, psychological, and social domains. In this chapter, the authors outline how puberty, and its underlying hormonal and physical changes, might elicit a sensitive period for the development of the social brain. The literature to date suggests that pubertal development is relevant for the structural development of the social brain, and this is partly moderated by biological sex. Functionally, puberty might render the brain more sensitive to social information. However, methodological issues relating to sample size, study design, and analysis, limit the possibility of drawing more specific conclusions. Apart from overcoming these methodological problems, future research should focus on individual differences in pubertal processes and their relevance to social brain development, as well as examining the mechanisms via which pubertal processes impact social behavior through social brain functioning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document