scholarly journals Survival Advantage and Comparable Toxicity in Reduced-Toxicity Treosulfan-Based versus Reduced-Intensity Busulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen in Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 445-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioanna Sakellari ◽  
Despina Mallouri ◽  
Eleni Gavriilaki ◽  
Ioannis Batsis ◽  
Maria Kaliou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Reduced Toxicity ◽  
Reduced Intensity ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adults with acute myeloid leukemia: myths, controversies, and unknowns

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (8) ◽  
pp. 2307-2318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
Martin S. Tallman ◽  
Daniel J. Weisdorf
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽  
Reduced Intensity ◽  
Acute Myeloid

AbstractProgress in the last decade has improved the understanding of leukemia biology. Molecular markers in combinations with cytogenetics have improved the risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and informed decision-making. In parallel, several important advances in the transplant field, such as better supportive care, improved transplant technology, increased availability of alternative donors, and reduced-intensity conditioning have improved the safety as well as access of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for a larger number of patients. In this review, the positioning of HCT in the management of patients with AML is evaluated in view of changing risk/benefit ratios associated with both conventional treatments and transplantation, and some of the controversies are addressed in light of emerging data. Increasing data demonstrate outcomes of alternative donor transplantation approaching HLA-identical sibling donors in high-risk AML supporting the inclusion of alternative donors in trials of prospective studies evaluating post remission strategies for high-risk AML. The use of reduced-intensity conditioning has expanded the eligibility of HCT to older patients with AML, and outcome data are encouraging. Continued study of HCT versus alternative therapies is required to optimize patients' outcomes in AML.

scholarly journals Myeloablative Versus Reduced-Intensity Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1154-1161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bart L. Scott ◽  
Marcelo C. Pasquini ◽  
Brent R. Logan ◽  
Juan Wu ◽  
Steven M. Devine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Reduced Intensity ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose The optimal regimen intensity before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is unknown. We hypothesized that lower treatment-related mortality (TRM) with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) would result in improved overall survival (OS) compared with myeloablative conditioning (MAC). To test this hypothesis, we performed a phase III randomized trial comparing MAC with RIC in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes. Patients and Methods Patients age 18 to 65 years with HCT comorbidity index ≤ 4 and < 5% marrow myeloblasts pre-HCT were randomly assigned to receive MAC (n = 135) or RIC (n = 137) followed by HCT from HLA-matched related or unrelated donors. The primary end point was OS 18 months post–random assignment based on an intent-to-treat analysis. Secondary end points included relapse-free survival (RFS) and TRM. Results Planned enrollment was 356 patients; accrual ceased at 272 because of high relapse incidence with RIC versus MAC (48.3%; 95% CI, 39.6% to 56.4% and 13.5%; 95% CI, 8.3% to 19.8%, respectively; P < .001). At 18 months, OS for patients in the RIC arm was 67.7% (95% CI, 59.1% to 74.9%) versus 77.5% (95% CI, 69.4% to 83.7%) for those in the MAC arm (difference, 9.8%; 95% CI, −0.8% to 20.3%; P = .07). TRM with RIC was 4.4% (95% CI, 1.8% to 8.9%) versus 15.8% (95% CI, 10.2% to 22.5%) with MAC ( P = .002). RFS with RIC was 47.3% (95% CI, 38.7% to 55.4%) versus 67.8% (95% CI, 59.1% to 75%) with MAC ( P < .01). Conclusion OS was higher with MAC, but this was not statistically significant. RIC resulted in lower TRM but higher relapse rates compared with MAC, with a statistically significant advantage in RFS with MAC. These data support the use of MAC as the standard of care for fit patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document