Analysis of F8 inversions as risk factors for FVIII inhibitor development in Indian severe haemophilia A patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Pinto ◽  
Kanjaksha Ghosh ◽  
Shrimati Shetty
Haemophilia ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 771-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Vézina ◽  
M. Carcao ◽  
C. Infante-Rivard ◽  
D. Lillicrap ◽  
A. M. Stain ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 114 (10) ◽  
pp. 676-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laszlo Nemes ◽  
Victor Jimenez-Yuste ◽  
Luminita Rusen ◽  
Ana Cid ◽  
Robert Charnigo ◽  
...  

SummaryThis prospective, open-label, postauthorisation safety surveillance study assessed clinically significant inhibitor development in patients with severe haemophilia A transitioning from moroctocog alfa or other factor VIII (FVIII) replacement products to reformulated moroctocog alfa (AF-CC). Males aged12 years with severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C) < 1 IU/dl), > 150 exposure days (EDs) to recombinant or plasma-derived FVIII products, and no detectable inhibitor at screening were enrolled. Primary end point was the incidence of clinically significant FVIII inhibitor development. Secondary end points included annualised bleeding rate (ABR), less-than-expected therapeutic effect (LETE), and FVIII recovery. Patients were assigned to one of two cohorts based on whether they were transitioning to moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) from moroctocog alfa (cohort 1; n=146) or from another recombinant or plasma-derived FVIII product (cohort 2; n=62). Mean number of EDs on study was 94 (range, 1–139). Six positive FVIII inhibitor results, as determined by local laboratories, were reported in four patients; none were confirmed by a central laboratory, no inhibitor-related clinical manifestations were reported, and all anti-FVIII antibody assays were negative. Median ABRs were 23.4 and 3.4 in patients categorised at baseline as following on-demand and prophylactic regimens, respectively; 86.5 % of bleeding episodes resolved after one infusion. LETE incidence was 0.06 % and 0.19 % in the on-demand and prophylaxis settings, respectively. FVIII recovery remained constant throughout the study. No new safety concerns were identified. This study found no increased risk of clinically significant FVIII inhibitor development in patients transitioning from moroctocog alfa or other FVIII replacement products to moroctocog alfa (AF-CC).


Author(s):  
Ri J. Liesner ◽  
Aby Abraham ◽  
Carmen Altisent ◽  
Mark J. Belletrutti ◽  
Manuel Carcao ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction FVIII inhibitor development is the most serious contemporary treatment complication in haemophilia A, particularly in previously untreated patients (PUPs). No inhibitors developed in clinical trials in previously treated patients treated with simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq), a fourth-generation recombinant FVIII produced in a human cell line. Methods The NuProtect study investigated the immunogenicity of simoctocog alfa in PUPs. NuProtect was a prospective, multinational, open-label, non-controlled, phase III study. PUPs with severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C <1%) of any age and ethnicity were treated with simoctocog alfa for 100 exposure days or a maximum of 5 years. Patients were true PUPs without prior exposure to FVIII concentrates or blood components. Inhibitor titres were measured with the Nijmegen-modified Bethesda assay; cut-off for positivity was 0.6 BU mL−1 (≥0.6 to <5 low-titre, ≥5 high titre). Results A total of 108 PUPs with a median age at first treatment of 12.0 months (interquartile range: 8.0–23.5) were treated with simoctocog alfa. F8 mutation type was known for 102 patients (94.4%) of whom 90 (88.2%) had null F8 mutations and 12 (11.8%) had non-null mutations. Of 105 PUPs evaluable for inhibitor development, 28 (26.7%) developed inhibitors; 17 high titre (16.2%) and 11 low titre (10.5%). No PUPs with non-null F8 mutations developed inhibitors. Conclusion In the NuProtect study, the rate of inhibitor development in PUPs with severe haemophilia A treated with simoctocog alfa was lower than the rate reported for hamster-cell-derived recombinant factor VIII products in other recent clinical trials. No inhibitors were reported in PUPs with non-null F8 mutations.


2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (05) ◽  
pp. 968-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riita Lassila ◽  
Flora Peyvandi ◽  
Gabriele Calizzani ◽  
Alex Gatt ◽  
Thierry Lambert ◽  
...  

SummaryInhibitor development represents the most serious side effect of haemophilia treatment. Any difference in risk of inhibitor formation depending on the product used might be of clinical relevance. It was this study’s objective to assess inhibitor development according to clotting factor concentrate in severe haemophilia A and B. The European Haemophilia Safety Surveillance (EUHASS) was set up as a study monitoring adverse events overall and according to concentrate. Since October 2008, inhibitors were reported at least quarterly. Number of treated patients was reported annually, specifying the number of patients completing 50 exposure days (Previously Untreated Patients, PUPs) without inhibitor development. Cumulative incidence, incidence rates and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Data from October 1, 2008 to December 31, 2012 were analysed for 68 centres that validated their data. Inhibitors developed in 108/417 (26 %; CI 22–30 %) PUPs with severe haemophilia A and 5/72 (7 %; CI 2–16%) PUPs with severe haemophilia B. For Previously Treated Patients (PTPs), 26 inhibitors developed in 17,667 treatment years [0.15/100 treatment years; CI 0.10–0.22) for severe haemophilia A and 1/2836 (0.04/100; (CI 0.00–0.20) for severe haemophilia B. Differences between plasma-derived and recombinant concentrates, or among the different recombinant FVIII concentrates were investigated. In conclusion, while confirming the expected rates of inhibitors in PUPs and PTPs, no class or brand related differences were observed.


Haemophilia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 809-816
Author(s):  
Carla J. Jonker ◽  
Katrien Oude Rengerink ◽  
Arno W. Hoes ◽  
Peter G. M. Mol ◽  
H. Marijke Berg

Haemophilia ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Hashemi ◽  
K. Fischer ◽  
K. G. M. Moons ◽  
H. M. Berg ◽  

Haemophilia ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. GOUW ◽  
J. G. VAN DER BOM ◽  
H. M. VAN DEN BERG ◽  
R. A. ZEWALD ◽  
J. K. PLOOS VAN AMSTEL ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (01) ◽  
pp. 36-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Escuriola ◽  
K. Kurnik ◽  
R. Schobess ◽  
S. Horneff ◽  
A. Kosch ◽  
...  

SummaryFor the study presented here 135 pediatric PUP patients with haemophilia consecutively admitted to German pediatric haemophilia treatment centers were investigated. In addition to factor VIII activity, the factor V (FV) G1691A mutation, the factor II (FII) G20210A variant, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) T677T genotype, elevated lipoprotein a (Lp a), antithrombin, protein C, and protein S were investigated. 103 out of 122 HA patients (FVIII activity <1%) were suffering from severe HA. The prevalence of prothrombotic risk factors in children with severe haemophilia A (HA) did not differ from previously reported data: FV GA 5.8%, FII GA 3.9%, MTHFR TT 10%, elevated Lp a 7%, protein C type I deficiency 1.1%. The first symptomatic bleeding leading to diagnosis of severe haemophilia occurred with a median age of 1.6 years (range: 0.5-7.1 years) in children carrying prothrombotic risk factors compared to non-carriers (0.9 years (0.1-4.0; p = 0.01). Two patients presenting with neonatal stroke due to elevated Lp a and the FII GA variant showed haemorrhagic stroke transformation triggered by severe haemophilia. In addition, when haemophilia A was corrected by administration of factor VIII concentrates eight out of 25 children with central lines in place developed catheter-related thrombosis. Conclusion: The data of this multicentre cohort study demonstrate that the clinical phenotype of severe haemophilia A in childhood is clearly influenced by the coinheritance of prothrombotic risk factors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document