Unravelling intrinsic efficacy and ligand bias at G protein coupled receptors: A practical guide to assessing functional data

2016 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa A. Stott ◽  
David A. Hall ◽  
Nicholas D. Holliday
2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (52) ◽  
pp. 18494-18507
Author(s):  
Kelly Karl ◽  
Michael D. Paul ◽  
Elena B. Pasquale ◽  
Kalina Hristova

Ligand bias is the ability of ligands to differentially activate certain receptor signaling responses compared with others. It reflects differences in the responses of a receptor to specific ligands and has implications for the development of highly specific therapeutics. Whereas ligand bias has been studied primarily for G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs), there are also reports of ligand bias for receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). However, the understanding of RTK ligand bias is lagging behind the knowledge of GPCR ligand bias. In this review, we highlight how protocols that were developed to study GPCR signaling can be used to identify and quantify RTK ligand bias. We also introduce an operational model that can provide insights into the biophysical basis of RTK activation and ligand bias. Finally, we discuss possible mechanisms underpinning RTK ligand bias. Thus, this review serves as a primer for researchers interested in investigating ligand bias in RTK signaling.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaimee Gundry ◽  
Rachel Glenn ◽  
Priya Alagesan ◽  
Sudarshan Rajagopal

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (552) ◽  
pp. eaao6152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Lorenzen ◽  
Emilie Ceraudo ◽  
Yamina A. Berchiche ◽  
Carlos A. Rico ◽  
Alexandre Fürstenberg ◽  
...  

Chemokines and some chemical analogs of chemokines prevent cellular HIV-1 entry when bound to the HIV-1 coreceptors C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) or C-X-C chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4), which are G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs). The ideal HIV-1 entry blocker targeting the coreceptors would display ligand bias and avoid activating G protein–mediated pathways that lead to inflammation. We compared CCR5-dependent activation of second messenger pathways in a single cell line. We studied two endogenous chemokines [RANTES (also known as CCL5) and MIP-1α (also known as CCL3)] and four chemokine analogs of RANTES (5P12-, 5P14-, 6P4-, and PSC-RANTES). We found that CCR5 signaled through both Gi/o and Gq/11. IP1 accumulation and Ca2+ flux arose from Gq/11 activation, rather than from Gβγ subunit release after Gi/o activation as had been previously proposed. The 6P4- and PSC-RANTES analogs were superagonists for Gq/11 activation, whereas the 5P12- and 5P14-RANTES analogs displayed a signaling bias for Gi/o. These results demonstrate that RANTES analogs elicit G protein subtype–specific signaling bias and can cause CCR5 to couple preferentially to Gq/11 rather than to Gi/o signaling pathways. We propose that G protein subtype–specific signaling bias may be a general feature of GPCRs that can couple to more than one G protein family.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document