Co-hydrothermal carbonization of food waste-woody sawdust blend: Interaction effects on the hydrochar properties and nutrients characteristics

2020 ◽  
Vol 316 ◽  
pp. 123900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tengfei Wang ◽  
Buchun Si ◽  
Zhengjun Gong ◽  
Yunbo Zhai ◽  
Mingfeng Cao ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 801 (1) ◽  
pp. 012002
Author(s):  
Thi Hoang Tuyen Do ◽  
Thai-Hoang Le ◽  
Thi Phuong Thuy Pham

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 2271
Author(s):  
Pretom Saha ◽  
Nepu Saha ◽  
Shanta Mazumder ◽  
M. Toufiq Reza

Co-hydrothermal carbonization (Co-HTC) is an emerging technology for processing multiple waste streams together to improve their fuel properties in the solid product, known as hydrochar, compared to the hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of those individual streams. Sulfur is considered one of the most toxic contaminants in solid fuel and the combustion of this sulfur results in the emission of SOx. It was reported in the literature that, besides the fuel properties, Co-HTC reduced the total sulfur content in the hydrochar phase significantly. However, the transformation of different forms of sulfur has not yet been studied. Therefore, this study investigated the transformation of different forms of sulfur under the Co-HTC treatment. In the study, the Co-HTC of food waste (FW) and two types of coal wastes (middle bottom (CW1) and 4 top (CW2)) were conducted at 180 °C, 230 °C and 280 °C for 30 min. Different forms of sulfur were measured by using elemental analysis (total sulfur), and a wet chemical method (sulfate sulfur and pyritic sulfur). The organic sulfur was measured by the difference method. The results showed that a maximum of 49% and 65% decrease in total sulfur was achieved for CW1FW and CW2FW, respectively, at 230 °C. Similar to the total sulfur, the organic sulfur was also decreased about 85% and 75% for CW1FW and CW2FW, respectively. Based on these results, a sulfur transformation mechanism under Co-HTC treatment was proposed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 2478-2492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Li ◽  
Ryan Diederick ◽  
Joseph R.V. Flora ◽  
Nicole D. Berge

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-144
Author(s):  
Wonduck Chung ◽  
◽  
Minah Oh ◽  
Woori Cho ◽  
Seong-Kyu Park ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 247 ◽  
pp. 182-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tengfei Wang ◽  
Yunbo Zhai ◽  
Yun Zhu ◽  
Chuan Peng ◽  
Bibo Xu ◽  
...  

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (17) ◽  
pp. 4572
Author(s):  
Ioannis O. Vardiambasis ◽  
Theodoros N. Kapetanakis ◽  
Christos D. Nikolopoulos ◽  
Trinh Kieu Trang ◽  
Toshiki Tsubota ◽  
...  

In this study, the growing scientific field of alternative biofuels was examined, with respect to hydrochars produced from renewable biomasses. Hydrochars are the solid products of hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and their properties depend on the initial biomass and the temperature and duration of treatment. The basic (Scopus) and advanced (Citespace) analysis of literature showed that this is a dynamic research area, with several sub-fields of intense activity. The focus of researchers on sewage sludge and food waste as hydrochar precursors was highlighted and reviewed. It was established that hydrochars have improved behavior as fuels compared to these feedstocks. Food waste can be particularly useful in co-hydrothermal carbonization with ash-rich materials. In the case of sewage sludge, simultaneous P recovery from the HTC wastewater may add more value to the process. For both feedstocks, results from large-scale HTC are practically non-existent. Following the review, related data from the years 2014–2020 were retrieved and fitted into four different artificial neural networks (ANNs). Based on the elemental content, HTC temperature and time (as inputs), the higher heating values (HHVs) and yields (as outputs) could be successfully predicted, regardless of original biomass used for hydrochar production. ANN3 (based on C, O, H content, and HTC temperature) showed the optimum HHV predicting performance (R2 0.917, root mean square error 1.124), however, hydrochars’ HHVs could also be satisfactorily predicted by the C content alone (ANN1, R2 0.897, root mean square error 1.289).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document