Bone mineral density measurements on cortical and trabecular specimens: Validation of a densitometric calibration protocol for in-vitro micro-CT

Bone ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. S179
Author(s):  
L. Mecozzi ◽  
R. Stoico ◽  
S. Tassani ◽  
F. Particelli ◽  
F. Baruffaldi ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (01) ◽  
pp. 1750015
Author(s):  
FABIO BARUFFALDI ◽  
ROSSELLA STOICO ◽  
SIMONE TASSANI ◽  
LAURA MECOZZI ◽  
STEFANO FALCIONI ◽  
...  

Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) is widely used for in vitro studies to characterize bone structure at the resolution of 10–100 microns. However, a densitometric calibration protocol is necessary to convert the X-ray attenuation coefficient provided by micro-CT in bone mineral density (BMD). The lastest one has an important role to improve the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models. This work presents a simple calibration protocol based on the use of solid hydroxyapatite phantoms with the correction of the beam hardening effect. The method was validated in comparison to ashing measures of cortical and trabecular human bone. In addition, bone samples tissue mineral density (TMD) was calculated with two different methods. The correlation between ash density and BMD was linear both for cortical ([Formula: see text]) and trabecular bone ([Formula: see text]). The analysis stratified by tissue type versus the pooled analysis confirmed the validity of a common linear model for both types of tissue ([Formula: see text]). Despite its simplicity, the correlation obtained in this work does not depend on the acquisition settings of the micro-CT. TMD was shown to be dependent on the tissue investigated, with values in the range of 1.15–1.21[Formula: see text]mg/mm3 for trabecular bone, and 1.19–1.29[Formula: see text]mg/mm3 for cortical bone. Results are of some interest for generating micro finite elements models.


1996 ◽  
Vol 89 (8) ◽  
pp. 457-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
D J Torgerson ◽  
C Donaldson ◽  
D M Reid

Bone mineral density measurements have been criticized on the grounds that they are not a worth-while screening tool. In this paper we argue that bone mineral measurements can be an efficient diagnostic tool even if they are not of proven value for screening. There is complex relationship between the costs of a measurement, the intervention and the predictive value of the test all of which must be accounted for when assessing the value of a bone density measurement. For bone density measurements to be used for screening, a wider evaluation needs to be undertaken compared with that for their use as a diagnostic tool. We address some common objections, for example, that low compliance with screening would undermine efficiency, and show that these are not relevant. Evaluations of screening need to address issues that are likely to affect efficiency.


Bone ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Kröger ◽  
P. Vainio ◽  
J. Nieminen ◽  
A. Kotaniemi

Author(s):  
Melissa R. Requist ◽  
Yantarat Sripanich ◽  
Tim Rolvien ◽  
Amy L. Lenz ◽  
Alexej Barg

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. S13-S14
Author(s):  
Jae-Sun Park ◽  
Im-Jeong Na ◽  
Jung-Hwa Shin ◽  
Kwang-Yoon Kim ◽  
Sung-Won Yang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document