scholarly journals Protein-Protein Complex Structure Prediction using the Solution Theory in the Energy Representation

2017 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 53a-54a
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Takemura ◽  
Akio Kitao ◽  
Nobuyuki Matubayasi
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunda Si ◽  
Chengfei Yan

AlphaFold2 is expected to be able to predict protein complex structures as long as a multiple sequence alignment (MSA) of the interologs of the target protein-protein interaction (PPI) can be provided. However, preparing the MSA of protein-protein interologs is a non-trivial task. In this study, a simplified phylogeny-based approach was applied to generate the MSA of interologs, which was then used as the input of AlphaFold2 for protein complex structure prediction. Extensively benchmarked this protocol on non-redundant PPI dataset, we show complex structures of 79.5% of the bacterial PPIs and 49.8% of the eukaryotic PPIs can be successfully predicted. Considering PPIs may not be conserved in species with long evolutionary distances, we further restricted interologs in the MSA to different taxonomic ranks of the species of the target PPI in protein complex structure prediction. We found the success rates can be increased to 87.9% for the bacterial PPIs and 56.3% of the eukaryotic PPIs if interologs in the MSA are restricted to a specific taxonomic rank of the species of each target PPI. Finally, we show the optimal taxonomic ranks for protein complex structure prediction can be selected with the application of the predicted TM-scores of the output models.


2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 751-757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sweta Vangaveti ◽  
Thom Vreven ◽  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Zhiping Weng

Abstract Motivation Template-based and template-free methods have both been widely used in predicting the structures of protein–protein complexes. Template-based modeling is effective when a reliable template is available, while template-free methods are required for predicting the binding modes or interfaces that have not been previously observed. Our goal is to combine the two methods to improve computational protein–protein complex structure prediction. Results Here, we present a method to identify and combine high-confidence predictions of a template-based method (SPRING) with a template-free method (ZDOCK). Cross-validated using the protein–protein docking benchmark version 5.0, our method (ZING) achieved a success rate of 68.2%, outperforming SPRING and ZDOCK, with success rates of 52.1% and 35.9% respectively, when the top 10 predictions were considered per test case. In conclusion, a statistics-based method that evaluates and integrates predictions from template-based and template-free methods is more successful than either method independently. Availability and implementation ZING is available for download as a Github repository (https://github.com/weng-lab/ZING.git). Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 95-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yangyu Huang ◽  
Haotian Li ◽  
Yi Xiao

2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Vreven ◽  
H. Hwang ◽  
B. G. Pierce ◽  
Z. Weng

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Sunny ◽  
Jayaraj PB

ResDock is a new method to improve the performance of protein-protein complex structure prediction. It utilizes shape complementarity of the protein surfaces to generate the conformation space. The use of an appropriate scoring function helps to select the feasible structures. An interplay between pose generation phase and scoring phase enhance the performance of the proposed ab initio technique. <br>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ameya Harmalkar ◽  
Sai Pooja Mahajan ◽  
Jeffrey J. Gray

Despite the progress in prediction of protein complexes over the last decade, recent blind protein complex structure prediction challenges revealed limited success rates (less than 20% models with DockQ score > 0.4) on targets that exhibit significant conformational change upon binding. To overcome limitations in capturing backbone motions, we developed a new, aggressive sampling method that incorporates temperature replica exchange Monte Carlo (T-REMC) and conformational sampling techniques within docking protocols in Rosetta. Our method, ReplicaDock 2.0, mimics induced-fit mechanism of protein binding to sample backbone motions across putative interface residues on-the-fly, thereby recapitulating binding-partner induced conformational changes. Furthermore, ReplicaDock 2.0 clocks in at 150-500 CPU hours per target (protein-size dependent); a runtime that is significantly faster than Molecular Dynamics based approaches. For a benchmark set of 88 proteins with moderate to high flexibility (unbound-to-bound iRMSD over 1.2 Angstroms), ReplicaDock 2.0 successfully docks 61% of moderately flexible complexes and 35% of highly flexible complexes. Additionally, we demonstrate that by biasing backbone sampling particularly towards residues comprising flexible loops or hinge domains, highly flexible targets can be predicted to under 2 angstrom accuracy. This indicates that additional gains are possible when mobile protein segments are known.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Sunny ◽  
Jayaraj PB

ResDock is a new method to improve the performance of protein-protein complex structure prediction. It utilizes shape complementarity of the protein surfaces to generate the conformation space. The use of an appropriate scoring function helps to select the feasible structures. An interplay between pose generation phase and scoring phase enhance the performance of the proposed ab initio technique. <br>


2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 252-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Walzthoeni ◽  
Alexander Leitner ◽  
Florian Stengel ◽  
Ruedi Aebersold

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document