Reducing Heart Failure Admissions Through Heart Success Transitional Care Model

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. S12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah J. Fenner ◽  
Sanjeev K. Gulati ◽  
Karen Cloninger ◽  
Meghan E. Emig
2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 53-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Brian Bixby ◽  
Joanne Konick-McMahon ◽  
Catherine G. McKenna

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (22) ◽  
pp. 1402-1407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace Williams ◽  
Karen Akroyd ◽  
Linda Burke

Author(s):  
Harriette G.C. Van Spall ◽  
Ersilia M. DeFilippis ◽  
Shun Fu Lee ◽  
Urun Erbas Oz ◽  
Richard Perez ◽  
...  

Background: Transitional care may have different effects in males and females hospitalized for heart failure. We assessed the sex-specific effects of a transitional care model on clinical outcomes following hospitalization for heart failure. Methods: In this stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial of adults hospitalized for heart failure in Ontario, Canada, 10 hospitals were randomized to a group of transitional care services or usual care. Outcomes in this exploratory analysis were composite all-cause readmission, emergency department visit, or death at 6 months; and composite all-cause readmission or emergency department visit at 6 months. Models were adjusted for stepped-wedge design and patient age. Results: Among 2494 adults, mean (SD) age was 77.7 (12.1) years, and 1258 (50.4%) were female. The first composite outcome occurred in 371 (66.3%) versus 433 (64.1%) males (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04 [95% CI, 0.86–1.26]; P =0.67) and in 326 (59.9%) versus 463 (64.8%) females (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.69–1.01]; P =0.06) in the intervention and usual care groups, respectively ( P =0.012 for sex interaction). The second composite outcome occurred in 357 (63.8%) versus 417 (61.7%) males (HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.85–1.24]; P =0.76) and 314 (57.7%) versus 450 (63.0%) females (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.67–0.99]; P =0.037) in the intervention and usual care groups, respectively ( P =0.024 for sex interaction). The sex differences were driven by a reduction in all-cause emergency department visits among females (HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.51–0.87]; P =0.003), but not males (HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.85–1.43]; P =0.46), receiving the intervention ( P <0.001 for sex interaction). Conclusions: A transitional care model offered a reduction in all-cause emergency department visits among females but not males following hospitalization for heart failure. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02112227.


Author(s):  
Chrysanthi Papoutsi ◽  
Christine A'Court ◽  
Joseph Wherton ◽  
Sara Shaw ◽  
Trisha Greenhalgh

Abstract BackgroundCentralised specialist remote support, in which a clinician responds promptly to biomarker changes, could potentially improve outcomes in heart failure. The SUPPORT-HF2 trial compared telehealth technology alone with the same technology combined with centralised remote support. The intervention was implemented differently in different sites; no significant impact was found overall. We sought to explain these findings in a qualitative evaluation. Methods51 people (25 patients, 3 carers, 18 clinicians and 4 additional research staff) were interviewed and observed in 7 SUPPORT-HF sites across UK between 2016 and 2018. We also collected 110 pages of documents. Analysis was informed by sociotechnical theory. ResultsPatients’ experiences of the technology were largely positive; staff engaged with the intervention to a variable degree. Existing services, staffing levels, technical capacity and previous experience with telehealth all influenced how the complex intervention of ‘telehealth technology plus centralised specialist remote support’ was interpreted and the extent to which it was adopted and used to its full potential. In some settings, the intervention was quickly mobilised to fill significant gaps in service provision. In others, it was seen as usefully extending the existing care model for selected patients. However, in some settings, the new care model was actively resisted and the technology little used. In one setting, centralised provision of specialist advice aligned awkwardly with an existing community-based heart failure support service. ConclusionsThe introduction of a telehealth programme rests not only on the technological intervention but also on the individuals involved and numerous subtle aspects of local service design. An iterative approach that attends to patients’ illness experiences, clinicians’ professional values, work practices and care pathways could lead to more effective telehealth support for patients with heart failure.


Author(s):  
Hai Mai Ba ◽  
Youn-Jung Son ◽  
Kyounghoon Lee ◽  
Bo-Hwan Kim

Heart failure (HF) is a life-limiting illness and presents as a gradual functional decline with intermittent episodes of acute deterioration and some recovery. In addition, HF often occurs in conjunction with other chronic diseases, resulting in complex comorbidities. Hospital readmissions for HF, including emergency department (ED) visits, are considered preventable. Majority of the patients with HF are often discharged early in the recovery period with inadequate self-care instructions. To address these issues, transitional care interventions have been implemented with the common objective of reducing the rate of hospital readmission, including ED visits. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the benefits and adverse effects of transitional care interventions on clinical outcomes and patient-related outcomes of patients with HF. This integrative review aims to identify the components of transitional care interventions and the effectiveness of these interventions in improving health outcomes of patients with HF. Five databases were searched from January 2000 to December 2019, and 25 articles were included.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document