Percutaneous left ventricular support for high-risk PCI and cardiogenic shock: who gets what?

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roshni Shah ◽  
Alexcis Thomson ◽  
Kimberly Atianzar ◽  
Keith Somma ◽  
Anilkumar Mehra ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pratik K. Dalal ◽  
Amy Mertens ◽  
Dinesh Shah ◽  
Ivan Hanson

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) resulting in cardiogenic shock continues to be a substantial source of morbidity and mortality despite advances in recognition and treatment. Prior to the advent of percutaneous and more durable left ventricular support devices, prompt revascularization with the addition of vasopressors and inotropes were the standard of care in the management of this critical population. Recent published studies have shown that in addition to prompt revascularization, unloading of the left ventricle with the placement of the Impella percutaneous axillary flow pump can lead to improvement in mortality. Parameters such as the cardiac power output (CPO) and pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi), obtained through pulmonary artery catheterization, can help ascertain the productivity of right and left ventricular function. Utilization of these parameters can provide the information necessary to escalate support to the right ventricle with the insertion of an Impella RP or the left ventricle with the insertion of larger devices, which provide more forward flow. Herein, we present a case of AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock resulting in biventricular failure treated with the percutaneous insertion of an Impella RP and Impella 5.0 utilizing invasive markers of left and right ventricular function to guide the management and escalation of care.


Author(s):  
Kay D. Everett ◽  
Pankaj Jain ◽  
Richard Botto ◽  
Michael Salama ◽  
Satoshi Miyashita ◽  
...  

Identification of patients with cardiogenic shock and right ventricle (RV) dysfunction who may require biventricular rather than isolated left ventricular (LV) support remains challenging. In this setting, rigorous hemodynamic evaluation of biventricular contractility and load during initiation of LV support guides therapy. We now report a novel approach to assess biventricular pressure-volume loops in a patient receiving Impella 5.5 support for heart failure and shock.


Author(s):  
Fadi Hage ◽  
Ali Hage ◽  
Stuart Smith ◽  
A. Dave Nagpal ◽  
Michael W. A. Chu

Both surgical and percutaneous mitral repair remain contraindicated in patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction because of inadequate LV reserve and increased LV work with a competent mitral valve. We report a 55-year-old gentleman who presented in cardiogenic shock with missed severe DMR and severe LV dysfunction, in whom we performed a high-risk mitral repair and insertion of a prophylactic CentriMag LV assist device. This innovative approach was found to be successful with significant patient improvement in both LV function and clinical symptoms with a competent mitral valve.


Author(s):  
Diana A Gorog ◽  
Susanna Price ◽  
Dirk Sibbing ◽  
Andreas Baumbach ◽  
Davide Capodanno ◽  
...  

Abstract Timely and effective antithrombotic therapy is critical to improving outcome, including survival, in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Achieving effective platelet inhibition and anticoagulation, with minimal risk, is particularly important in high-risk ACS patients, especially those with cardiogenic shock (CS) or those successfully resuscitated following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), who have a 30-50% risk of death or a recurrent ischaemic event over the subsequent 30 days. There are unique challenges to achieving effective and safe antithrombotic treatment in this cohort of patients that are not encountered in most other ACS patients. This position paper focuses on patients presenting with CS or immediately post-OHCA, of presumed ischaemic aetiology, and examines issues related to thrombosis and bleeding risk. Both the physical and pharmacological impacts of CS, namely impaired drug absorption, metabolism, altered distribution and/or excretion, associated multiorgan failure, co-morbidities and co-administered treatments such as opiates, targeted temperature management, renal replacement therapy and circulatory or left ventricular assist devices, can have major impact on the effectiveness and safety of antithrombotic drugs. Careful attention to the choice of antithrombotic agent(s), route of administration, drug-drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring and factors that affect drug efficacy and safety, may reduce the risk of sub- or supra-therapeutic dosing and associated adverse events. This paper provides expert opinion, based on best available evidence, and consensus statements on optimising antithrombotic therapy in these very high-risk patients, in whom minimising the risk of thrombosis and bleeding is critical to improving outcome.


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Lauten ◽  
Annemarie E. Engström ◽  
Christian Jung ◽  
Klaus Empen ◽  
Paul Erne ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document