scholarly journals A Systematic Evaluation of Methods for Tailoring Genome-Scale Metabolic Models

Cell Systems ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-329.e6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sjoerd Opdam ◽  
Anne Richelle ◽  
Benjamin Kellman ◽  
Shanzhong Li ◽  
Daniel C. Zielinski ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Song-Min Schinn ◽  
Carly Morrison ◽  
Wei Wei ◽  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Nathan E. Lewis

AbstractGenome-scale metabolic models describe cellular metabolism with mechanistic detail. Given their high complexity, such models need to be parameterized correctly to yield accurate predictions and avoid overfitting. Effective parameterization has been well-studied for microbial models, but it remains unclear for higher eukaryotes, including mammalian cells. To address this, we enumerated model parameters that describe key features of cultured mammalian cells – including cellular composition, bioprocess performance metrics, mammalian-specific pathways, and biological assumptions behind model formulation approaches. We tested these parameters by building thousands of metabolic models and evaluating their ability to predict the growth rates of a panel of phenotypically diverse Chinese Hamster Ovary cell clones. We found the following considerations to be most critical for accurate parameterization: (1) cells limit metabolic activity to maintain homeostasis, (2) cell morphology and viability change dynamically during a growth curve, and (3) cellular biomass has a particular macromolecular composition. Depending on parameterization, models predicted different metabolic phenotypes, including contrasting mechanisms of nutrient utilization and energy generation, leading to varying accuracies of growth rate predictions. Notably, accurate parameter values broadly agreed with experimental measurements. These insights will guide future investigations of mammalian metabolism.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javad Zamani ◽  
Sayed-Amir Marashi ◽  
Tahmineh Lohrasebi ◽  
Mohammad-Ali Malboobi ◽  
Esmail Foroozan

Genome-scale metabolic models (GSMMs) have enabled researchers to perform systems-level studies of living organisms. As a constraint-based technique, flux balance analysis (FBA) aids computation of reaction fluxes and prediction of...


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 830-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingxing Jian ◽  
Ningchuan Li ◽  
Qian Chen ◽  
Qiang Hua

Reconstruction and application of genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) have facilitated metabolic engineering by providing a platform on which systematic computational analysis of metabolic networks can be performed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Riemer ◽  
René Rex ◽  
Dietmar Schomburg

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nhung Pham ◽  
Ruben Van Heck ◽  
Jesse van Dam ◽  
Peter Schaap ◽  
Edoardo Saccenti ◽  
...  

Genome scale metabolic models (GEMs) are manually curated repositories describing the metabolic capabilities of an organism. GEMs have been successfully used in different research areas, ranging from systems medicine to biotechnology. However, the different naming conventions (namespaces) of databases used to build GEMs limit model reusability and prevent the integration of existing models. This problem is known in the GEM community but its extent has not been analyzed in depth. In this study, we investigate the name ambiguity and the multiplicity of non-systematic identifiers and we highlight the (in)consistency in their use in eleven biochemical databases of biochemical reactions and the problems that arise when mapping between different namespaces and databases. We found that such inconsistencies can be as high as 83.1%, thus emphasizing the need for strategies to deal with these issues. Currently, manual verification of the mappings appears to be the only solution to remove inconsistencies when combining models. Finally, we discuss several possible approaches to facilitate (future) unambiguous mapping.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document