Mechanistic modelling of kinetics and mass transfer for a solid–liquid system: Leaching of zinc with ferric iron

2010 ◽  
Vol 65 (15) ◽  
pp. 4460-4471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tapio Salmi ◽  
Henrik Grénman ◽  
Heidi Bernas ◽  
Johan Wärnå ◽  
Dmitry Yu. Murzin
2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 551-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noboru Kamei ◽  
Yoshihito Kato ◽  
Yutaka Tada ◽  
Takaomi Murai ◽  
Junichi Ando

2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Shi ◽  
M. Le Maguer

When cellular materials are immersed in a solution of high concentration, the mass transfer is considered a multi-component transport process in which simultaneous and countercurrent flows occur in the biological tissue. The mass transfer process of each component in the solid-liquid system is affected not only by operational parameters, but also by the presence of other components. The main driving force for the mass transfer phenomena is attributed to the concentration gradient between external and internal solid material, and the interaction among fluxes and tissue matrix. Matrix deformation and tissue shrinkage are important characteristics influencing mass transfer. The coupled mass transfer fluxes across the interface in an isothermal solid-liquid system were analysed by means of a film model as a function of the concentration gradients, based on the generalised multi-component mass transfer theories. Several possible situations of cell structure changes are discussed, and the effect of structural shrinkage on mass transfer is modelled in this study. The mass transfer model and parameters proposed in the present study is applicable to the unit operation such as osmotic treatment of cellular porous biomaterial.


1970 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-218
Author(s):  
A. D. Molchanov ◽  
G. A. Aksel'rud ◽  
A. I. Chernyavskii ◽  
I. N. Fiklistov

1951 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 255-261
Author(s):  
T. Ishino ◽  
T. Otake ◽  
T. Okada

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-128
Author(s):  
Yevgen Semenyshyn ◽  
◽  
Volodymyr Atamanyuk ◽  
Tetiana Rymar ◽  
Oleksandr Ivashchuk ◽  
...  

AIChE Journal ◽  
1960 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 482-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang-Tseng Fan ◽  
Yung-Chia Yang ◽  
Chin-Yung Wen

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 133-136
Author(s):  
D. M. Simak ◽  
Yа. M. Gumnytsky ◽  
V. M. Atamanyuk

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 827-839
Author(s):  
Eugenia Teodora Iacob Tudose ◽  
Marcela Popa ◽  
Ioan Mamaliga

1999 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan N. Jordan ◽  
Eric P. Nichols ◽  
Alfred B. Cunningham

Bioavailability is herein defined as the accessibility of a substrate by a microorganism. Further, bioavailability is governed by (1) the substrate concentration that the cell membrane “sees,” (i.e., the “directly bioavailable” pool) as well as (2) the rate of mass transfer from potentially bioavailable (e.g., nonaqueous) phases to the directly bioavailable (e.g., aqueous) phase. Mechanisms by which sorbed (bio)surfactants influence these two processes are discussed. We propose the hypothesis that the sorption of (bio)surfactants at the solid-liquid interface is partially responsible for the increased bioavailability of surface-bound nutrients, and offer this as a basis for suggesting the development of engineered in-situ bioremediation technologies that take advantage of low (bio)surfactant concentrations. In addition, other industrial systems where bioavailability phenomena should be considered are addressed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document