scholarly journals Risk of Cancer in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Nationwide Population-based Cohort Study With 30 Years of Follow-up Evaluation

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-273.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Kappelman ◽  
Dora K. Farkas ◽  
Millie D. Long ◽  
Rune Erichsen ◽  
Robert S. Sandler ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S299-S301
Author(s):  
C Le Berre ◽  
A Bourreille ◽  
M Flamant ◽  
G Bouguen ◽  
L Siproudhis ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are disabling disorders. The IBD-Disability Index (IBD-DI) was developed for quantifying disability in IBD patients but is difficult to use. The IBD-Disk is a shortened and visual adaptation of the IBD-DI. It has not been validated yet. The main objectives were to validate the IBD-Disk in a large cohort of IBD patients and to assess its variability over time. Methods From March 2018 to July 2019, IBD patients from three university-affiliated hospitals responded twice to both IBD-Disk and IBD-DI at 3–12 months intervals (NCT03590639). Validation included concurrent validity, reproducibility, internal consistency, and evaluation of IBD-Disk correlation with IBD activity. Variability was assessed by comparing scores between baseline and follow-up visits. Results A total of 559 patients (73% Crohn’s disease, 27% ulcerative colitis) were included and 389 were followed up (Table 1). There was a good correlation between IBD-Disk and IBD-DI scores (r = 0.75, p < 0.001) (Figure 1). The IBD-Disk was significantly higher in patients with active disease according to Physician/Patient Global Assessment (Figure 2), clinical scores (Figure 3), and biomarkers levels, compared with patients with inactive disease. Reproducibility was excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.90), as well as internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.89). The IBD-Disk score significantly decreased in patients becoming inactive over time. Conclusion This is the first study to validate the IBD-Disk in a large cohort of IBD patients, demonstrating that it is a valid and reliable tool for quantifying disability in clinical practice. Further studies are warranted to assess its correlation with endoscopic activity, to explore its responsiveness to change, and to evaluate the factors associated with disability.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. e0235142
Author(s):  
Martina Taborelli ◽  
Michele Sozzi ◽  
Stefania Del Zotto ◽  
Federica Toffolutti ◽  
Marcella Montico ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-939-S-940
Author(s):  
Manasi Agrawal ◽  
Santa Shrestha ◽  
Giulia Corn ◽  
Nete Munk Nielsen ◽  
Morten Frisch ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document