A three-dimensional parameterized and visually kinematic simulation module for the theoretical range of motion of total hip arthroplasty

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 427-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Ting Ji ◽  
Kai Tao ◽  
Cheng-Tao Wang
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Kinematic Simulation ◽  
Total Hip

scholarly journals Optimal combined anteversion pattern for obtaining a wider range of motion without prosthetic impingement after total hip arthroplasty: a three-dimensional analysis study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryo Hidaka ◽  
Kenta Matsuda ◽  
Masaki Nakamura ◽  
Shigeru Nakamura ◽  
Hirotaka Kawano
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Target Range ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Combined Anteversion ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
Prosthetic Impingement

Abstract Background Obtaining a larger theoretical range of motion (ROM) is crucial to avoid prosthetic impingement after total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, no reports have examined the permissible range values of combined anteversion (CA) satisfying targeted ROM without prosthetic impingement. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the possible postoperative CA extent that would allow meeting target ROM criteria according to Yoshimine’s theory using computed tomography (CT)-based three-dimensional motion analysis after THA. Methods This study included 114 patients (133 hips) who underwent cementless primary THA using a CT-based navigation system and implants (oscillation angle ≥ 135°). Implant positions were determined using Yoshimine's CA formula. Postoperative evaluation was conducted using a three-dimensional templating software for CT data. The postoperative Yoshimine’s and Widmer’s CA was calculated, and the difference between the target and postoperative values was defined as the error of Yoshimine’s CA and Widmer’s CA. Prosthetic ROM was assessed by Yoshimine’s stringent criteria for activities of daily living. Based on fulfilling these criteria, all patients were divided into the ROM (+) and ROM (-) groups. Evaluation items were compared between the two groups. Results There were 111 and 22 hips in the ROM (+) and ROM (-) groups, respectively. A significant difference was noted in the absolute error of Yoshimine’s and Widmer’s CA between the two groups. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, threshold values of 6.0 (higher values indicate greater disability; sensitivity 90.9%, specificity 72.1%) for the absolute Yoshimine’s CA difference (area under the curve [AUC] 0.87, P < 0.01) and 6.9 (higher values indicate greater disability; sensitivity 68.2%, specificity 88.3%) for the absolute Widmer’s CA difference (AUC 0.83, P < 0.01) were predictors in the ROM (-) group. Conclusions The target range of Yoshimine’s CA (90.8°±6.0°) and Widmer’s CA values (37.3°±6.9°) was crucial in implant orientation for obtaining theoretical ROM without prosthetic impingement after THA.

scholarly journals Optimal Combined Anteversion Range for Obtaining a Wider Range of Motion without Prosthetic Impingement after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Three-dimensional Analysis Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryo hidaka ◽  
Kenta Matsuda ◽  
Masaki Nakamura ◽  
Shigeru Nakamura ◽  
Hirotaka Kawano
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Target Range ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Combined Anteversion ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
Prosthetic Impingement

Abstract Background: Obtaining a larger theoretical range of motion (ROM) is crucial to avoid prosthetic impingement after total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, no reports have examined the permissible range values of combined anteversion (CA) satisfying targeted ROM without prosthetic impingement. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the possible postoperative CA extent that would allow meeting target ROM criteria according to Yoshimine’s theory using computed tomography (CT)-based three-dimensional motion analysis after THA.Methods: This study included 114 patients (133 hips) who underwent cementless primary THA using a CT-based navigation system and implants (oscillation angle ≥135°). Implant positions were determined using Yoshimine's CA formula. Postoperative evaluation was conducted using a three-dimensional templating software for CT data. The postoperative Yoshimine’s and Widmer’s CA was calculated, and the difference between the target and postoperative values was defined as the error of Yoshimine’s CA and Widmer’s CA. Prosthetic ROM was assessed by Yoshimine’s stringent criteria for activities of daily living. Based on fulfilling these criteria, all patients were divided into the ROM (+) and ROM (-) groups. Evaluation items were compared between the two groups.Results: There were 111 and 22 hips in the ROM (+) and ROM (-) groups, respectively. A significant difference was noted in the absolute error of Yoshimine’s and Widmer’s CA between the two groups. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, threshold values of 6.0 (higher values indicate greater disability; sensitivity 90.9%, specificity 72.1%) for the absolute Yoshimine’s CA difference (area under the curve [AUC] 0.87, P<0.01) and 6.9 (higher values indicate greater disability; sensitivity 68.2%, specificity 88.3%) for the absolute Widmer’s CA difference (AUC 0.83, P<0.01) were predictors in the ROM (-) group.Conclusions: The target range of Yoshimine’s CA (90.8°±6.0°) and Widmer’s CA values (37.3°±6.9°) was crucial in implant orientation for obtaining theoretical ROM without prosthetic impingement after THA.

AUTOMATED RANGE-OF-MOTION DEVICE FOR TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY PROSTHESIS

2006 ◽  
Vol 10 (03) ◽  
pp. 151-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prashanth P. Prabhakar ◽  
Qingshan Chen ◽  
Fredrick Schultz ◽  
Jean Yves Lazennec ◽  
Kai-Nan An
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Coordinate Measuring Machine ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Rocking Motion ◽  
Measuring Machine

Hip simulators are regularly used by researchers to assess total hip arthroplasty (THA) implants, range of motion, stability, and alignment of acetabular cup and stem. Previous papers have described three types of simulators: three-dimensional protractors, biaxial rocking motion (BRM) protractors, and single-axis prosthetic range-of-motion (PROM) devices. We have developed a new hip simulator in which the ROM device is completely automated in three independent axes (elevation, internal/external rotation, and plane of elevation). Coupled with the simulator, we used a FaroArm Gold Series coordinate measuring machine (CMM) to accurately align the implant components. The results show that the methodology and alignment setup are accurate and repeatable. With this simulator and digitizer, we are able to study the characteristics of numerous THA implants at various orientations of the pelvis, acetabular cup, stem, and femur.

scholarly journals Cup-To-Neck Contact and Range of Motion after Total Hip Arthroplasty with Large Head Diameters: An Original Three-Dimensional Combined Gait and Videofluoroscopy Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 2695
Author(s):  
Claudio Belvedere ◽  
Giada Lullini ◽  
Maurizio Ortolani ◽  
Andrea Ensini ◽  
Stefano Durante ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Gait Analysis ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Motor Tasks ◽  
Large Femoral Head ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Limited Range Of Motion

After a total hip arthroplasty, a limited range of motion and lower-limb disability continue to be observed, with these being mainly associated with the implant design and the head-to-neck ratio. Larger diameters of the head bearings were assumed to provide better stability, a larger range of motion, and smaller risks of dislocation and stem-to-liner impingement. However, these claims have never been demonstrated in real patients. The specific aim of this study was to assess, via multi-instrumental analysis, whether the range of motion of a replaced hip is limited by the stem-to-liner contact in patients with large femoral head diameters. Twenty-three patients with a total hip arthroplasty were evaluated at their one-year follow-ups using clinical and instrumental examinations. A combined three-dimensional gait analysis of the full body and videofluoroscopy analysis of the replaced hip were performed during the execution of standard, i.e., daily living, and more demanding motor tasks. The latter were meant to reach the extreme range of motion at the replaced hip site, thus revealing possible stem-to-liner contact. An original technique based on imaging and computer-aided design (CAD) models of the prosthesis components was developed to calculate the stem-to-liner distance. Excellent clinical scores were observed in the study. The gait analysis showed that the range of motion of the replaced hip in the sagittal plane, averaged over all patients, ranged from 28° to 78° in standard activities. In more demanding tasks, single peaks were as high as 110°, 39°, and 60° in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse anatomical planes, respectively. In all motor tasks, the stem-to-liner distances ranged from 8.7 to 13.0 mm on average, with one outlier minimum distance being 2.2 mm. This study shows that, even in demanding motor tasks and with an extreme range of motion, the hip joint replaced with large femoral head diameters did not experience impingement between the prosthesis components.

Effects of the Femoral Offset and the Head Size on the Safe Range of Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 646-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akinobu Matsushita ◽  
Yasuharu Nakashima ◽  
Seiya Jingushi ◽  
Takuaki Yamamoto ◽  
Akio Kuraoka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Head Size ◽  
Femoral Offset ◽  
Total Hip

The effect of range of motion simulated with a patient-specific three-dimensional simulation analysis on dislocation after total hip arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110448
Author(s):  
Ryo Mitsutake ◽  
Hiromasa Tanino ◽  
Hiroshi Ito
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Simulation Analysis ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Posterior Dislocation ◽  
Flexion Angle ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Dimensional Simulation

Background: Dislocation continues to be a common complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although previous studies of computed simulation analysis investigated the range of motion (ROM), it is unclear whether the ROM before impingement simulated using computed tomography-based 3-dimensional simulation analysis (simulated ROM) is related to dislocation after THA. It is also unclear what angles are required in computed simulation analyses for stable hips after THA. In this study, we compared the simulated ROM in patients with and without dislocation. Methods: 16 patients with posterior dislocation were compared with 48 matched patients without dislocation. Risk factors including preoperative bone morphology of the hip, implant position, change of femoral offset, change of leg length, anterior aspect of the greater trochanter (GTa) length, and anterior inferior iliac spine length were also compared. Results: The mean flexion angle, internal-rotation at 90° flexion (IR) angle, cup anteversion based on the anterior pelvic plane (APP), tilt-adjusted cup anteversion and GTa length were significantly different between patients with dislocation and patients without dislocation ( p = 0.033, 0.002, 0.010, 0.047, 0.046). A receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis suggested cutoff points for flexion angle, IR angle, cup anteversion based on the APP, tilt-adjusted cup anteversion and GTa length, of 114.5°, 45.5°, 19.5°, 12.0° and 15.3 mm. Conclusions: This study suggests that preoperative planning to achieve a larger simulated ROM, flexion angle and IR angle, may reduce the risk of posterior dislocation. This study also suggests that fine-tuning of cup anteversion and/or trimming of the overhanging GTa during preoperative planning may reduce the risk of posterior dislocation.

Three‐dimensional kinematic analysis of dislocation mechanism in dual mobility total hip arthroplasty constructs

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Klemt ◽  
Georges Bounajem ◽  
Venkatsaiakhil Tirumala ◽  
Liang Xiong ◽  
Anand Padmanabha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Kinematic Analysis ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Dislocation Mechanism ◽  
Dual Mobility ◽  
Total Hip
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document