Neurological deficits secondary to unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Recovery following microsurgical clipping versus endovascular coil embolization

2014 ◽  
Vol 116 ◽  
pp. 106
Author(s):  
Dale Ding
Author(s):  
TE Darsaut ◽  

Background: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) are treated using endovascular treatment or microsurgical clipping. The safety and efficacy of treatments have not been compared in a randomized trial. Methods: We randomly allocated clipping or coiling to patients with 3-25mm UIAs judged treatable both ways. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as: initial failure of aneurysm treatment, intracranial hemorrhage or residual aneurysm on one year imaging. Secondary outcomes included neurological deficits following treatment, hospitalization >5 days, overall morbidity and mortality and angiographic results at one year. Results: 136 patients were enrolled from 2010 through 2016 and 134 patients were treated. The one-year primary outcome, available for 104 patients, was reached in 5/48 (10.4% (4.5%-22.2%)) patients allocated surgical clipping, and 10/56 (17.9% (10.0%-29.8%)) patients allocated endovascular coiling (OR: 0.54 (0.13, 1.90), P=0.40). Morbidity and mortality (mRS>2) at one year occurred in 2/48 (4.2% (1.2%-14.0%)) and 2/56 (3.6% (1.0%-12.1%)) patients allocated clipping and coiling respectively. New neurological deficits (15/65 vs 6/69; OR: 3.12 (1.05, 10.57), P=0.031), and hospitalizations beyond 5 days (30/65 vs 6/69; OR: 8.85 (3.22,28.59), P=0.0001) were more frequent after clipping. Conclusions: Surgical clipping led to greater initial treatment-related morbidity than endovascular coiling. At one year, the superior efficacy of clipping remains unproven and in need of randomized evidence.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 482-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshinori Matsushige ◽  
Shigeyuki Sakamoto ◽  
Daizo Ishii ◽  
Katsuhiro Shinagawa ◽  
Koji Shimonaga ◽  
...  

Background and purpose Current large-bore catheters can be easily and safely placed in the intracranial vessels for the stabilization of microcatheters in several neurointervention scenarios. We considered that a novel 3.4 French catheter (TACTICS, Technorat Corporation, Aichi, Japan) might be useful for intermediate/distal access in a triaxial system. Here, we present our initial experience using the TACTICS catheter for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Materials and methods A total of 35 endovascular coils were placed to embolize unruptured intracranial aneurysms of the anterior circulation using the TACTICS catheter between December 2016 and November 2017. These procedures were retrospectively reviewed to assess aneurysmal obliteration (Raymond’s classification), the volume embolization ratio (VER) and procedural complications in comparison with 96 conventional coil treatments during the 3-year period up to 2016. Data were matched for aneurysmal morphology (location, maximum diameter and aspect ratio) by the propensity method. Results In all procedures, the TACTICS catheter was atraumatically landed beyond the carotid siphon. There were no hemorrhagic or symptomatic ischemic complications. After propensity matching, 68 procedures were assessed (34 in each group). Achievement of Raymond’s scale 1 (complete occlusion) showed the same frequency in both groups (50% vs. 50%, p = 0.23). The VER was significantly higher with the TACTICS catheter than with the conventional method (34.0% vs. 28.7%, p = 0.003). Conclusion We reviewed our initial experience of the TACTICS catheter. It can be used as an intermediate catheter for safe and effective endovascular coil embolization of anterior circulation aneurysms.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Belal Hafeez Chaudhry ◽  
Tanveer Ul Haq ◽  
Syed Naseer Ahmed ◽  
Waseem Akhtar Mirza ◽  
Waseem Akhtar Mirza ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 156 (7) ◽  
pp. 1281-1287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyu-Sun Choi ◽  
Jung-Hyun Lee ◽  
Hyeong-Joong Yi ◽  
Hyoung-Joon Chun ◽  
Young-Jun Lee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document