18. Where is my hand? The blink reflex evoked by hand stimulation is increased when the hand enters the peripersonal space surrounding the face

2012 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. e7-e8
Author(s):  
C. Sambo ◽  
M. Liang ◽  
G.D. Iannetti
2012 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 880-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. F. Sambo ◽  
M. Liang ◽  
G. Cruccu ◽  
G. D. Iannetti

Electrical stimulation of the median nerve at the wrist may elicit a blink reflex [hand blink reflex (HBR)] mediated by a neural circuit at brain stem level. As, in a Sherringtonian sense, the blink reflex is a defensive response, in a series of experiments we tested, in healthy volunteers, whether and how the HBR is modulated by the proximity of the stimulated hand to the face. Electromyographic activity was recorded from the orbicularis oculi, bilaterally. We observed that the HBR is enhanced when the stimulated hand is inside the peripersonal space of the face, compared with when it is outside, irrespective of whether the proximity of the hand to the face is manipulated by changing the position of the arm ( experiment 1) or by rotating the head while keeping the arm position constant ( experiment 3). Experiment 2 showed that such HBR enhancement has similar magnitude when the participants have their eyes closed. Experiments 4 and 5 showed, respectively, that the blink reflex elicited by the electrical stimulation of the supraorbital nerve, as well as the N20 wave of the somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by the median nerve stimulation, are entirely unaffected by hand position. Taken together, our results provide compelling evidence that the brain stem circuits mediating the HBR in humans undergo tonic and selective top-down modulation from higher order cortical areas responsible for encoding the location of somatosensory stimuli in external space coordinates. These findings support the existence of a “defensive” peripersonal space, representing a safety margin advantageous for survival.


2016 ◽  
Vol 115 (1) ◽  
pp. 218-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Bufacchi ◽  
M. Liang ◽  
L. D. Griffin ◽  
G. D. Iannetti

Potentially harmful stimuli occurring within the defensive peripersonal space (DPPS), a protective area surrounding the body, elicit stronger defensive reactions. The spatial features of the DPPS are poorly defined and limited to descriptive estimates of its extent along a single dimension. Here we postulated a family of geometric models of the DPPS, to address two important questions with respect to its spatial features: What is its fine-grained topography? How does the nervous system represent the body area to be defended? As a measure of the DPPS, we used the strength of the defensive blink reflex elicited by electrical stimulation of the hand (hand-blink reflex, HBR), which is reliably modulated by the position of the stimulated hand in egocentric coordinates. We tested the goodness of fit of the postulated models to HBR data from six experiments in which we systematically explored the HBR modulation by hand position in both head-centered and body-centered coordinates. The best-fitting model indicated that 1) the nervous system's representation of the body area defended by the HBR can be approximated by a half-ellipsoid centered on the face and 2) the DPPS extending from this area has the shape of a bubble elongated along the vertical axis. Finally, the empirical observation that the HBR is modulated by hand position in head-centered coordinates indicates that the DPPS is anchored to the face. The modeling approach described in this article can be generalized to describe the spatial modulation of any defensive response.


2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (4) ◽  
pp. 1111-1124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viviana Versace ◽  
Stefania Campostrini ◽  
Luca Sebastianelli ◽  
Leopold Saltuari ◽  
Markus Kofler

The cutaneous silent period (CSP) to noxious finger stimulation constitutes a robust spinal inhibitory reflex that protects the hand from injury. In certain conditions, spinal inhibition is interrupted by a brief burst-like electromyographic activity, dividing the CSP into two inhibitory phases (I1 and I2). This excitatory component is termed long-loop reflex (LLR) and is presumed to be transcortical in origin. Efficient defense from environmental threats requires sensorimotor integration between multimodal sensory afferents and planning of defensive movements. In the defensive peripersonal space (DPPS) immediately surrounding the body, we interact with objects and persons with increased alertness. We investigated whether CSP differs when the stimulated hand is in the DPPS of the face compared with a distant position. Furthermore, we investigated the possible role of vision in CSP modulation. Fifteen healthy volunteers underwent CSP testing with the handheld either within 5 cm from the nose (near) or away from the body (far). Recordings were obtained from first dorsal interosseous muscle following index (D2) or little finger (D5) stimulation with varying intensities. A subgroup of subjects underwent CSP recordings in near and far conditions, both with eyes open and with eyes closed. No inhibitory CSP parameter differed between stimulation in near and far conditions. LLRs occurring following D2 stimulation were significantly larger in near than far conditions at all stimulus intensities, irrespective of subjects seeing their hand. Similar to the hand-blink reflex, spinally organized protective reflexes may be modulated by corticospinal facilitatory input when the hand enters the DPPS of the face. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The present findings demonstrate for the first time that a spinally organized protective reflex, the cutaneous silent period (CSP), may be modulated by top-down corticospinal facilitatory input when the stimulated hand enters the defensive peripersonal space (DPPS) of the face. In particular, the cortically mediated excitatory long-loop reflex, which may interrupt the CSP, is facilitated when the stimulated hand is in the DPPS, irrespective of visual control over the hand. No spinal inhibitory CSP parameter differs significantly in or outside the DPPS.


Brain ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 121 (12) ◽  
pp. 2317-2326 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Ladavas
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (7) ◽  
pp. e63
Author(s):  
Selahattin Ayas ◽  
Aysegül Gündüz ◽  
Feray Karaali Savrun ◽  
Meral Erdemir Kiziltan

2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (8) ◽  
pp. e152-e153
Author(s):  
V. Versace ◽  
S. Campostrini ◽  
L. Sebastianelli ◽  
L. Saltuari ◽  
J. Valls-Solé ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maddalena Beccherle ◽  
Stefania Facchetti ◽  
Francesca Villani ◽  
Marzia Zanini ◽  
Michele Scandola

Behavioural studies on Multisensory Peripersonal Space (PPS) representations are based on seminal findings in single-cell recordings.A classic experimental paradigm used to assess PPS is the Multisensory Integration Paradigm. In this paradigm Visuo-Tactile stimuli are administrated to participants. According to the paradigm, the tactile component vibrates when the visual component, approaching the participant, reaches a specific distance. Participants must detect the tactile component. Reaction times (RTs) are faster with closer visual stimuli. This effect is classically interpreted as a manifestation of PPS representation.However, the Visual and Tactile components are usually targeting at the same body part, and Tactile-Only RTs are considered constant.In this study we formally addressed two research questions: i) whether the Multisensory Visuo-Tactile RTs are independent from Tactile-Only RTs and whether the latter are influenced by time-dependency effects; and ii) whether PPS estimations derived from Multisensory Visuo-Tactile RTs depend on the location of the Visual or Tactile component of the stimuli.We studied 40 right-handed participants, in a repeated-measure design, crossing the position of the Tactile and Visual components of stimuli across the face, the hand and the foot, and 5 distances. Each trial could be Visuo-Tactile, Tactile-Only or a Catch trial.Frequentist and Bayesian analysis demonstrated that Tactile-Only RTs follow a non-monotonic trend, depending on the delay of stimulus administration. Furthermore, according to our findings, Visuo-Tactile RTs were proved to be dependent on Distance and location of the Visual component of the stimulus. Our results lead to the conclusion that Tactile-Only RTs should be removed from Visuo-Tactile RTs and that the Visual and Tactile components of Visuo-Tactile stimuli do not necessarily have to target at the same body part.These results may have an advantageous impact on the study of PPS representations, providing new and important methodological information.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Viviana Versace ◽  
Stefania Campostrini ◽  
Luca Sebastianelli ◽  
Leopold Saltuari ◽  
Josep Valls-Solé ◽  
...  

AbstractThe excitability of brainstem circuitries mediating defensive blinking in response to abrupt sensory inputs is continuously modulated by cortical areas, e.g., the hand-blink reflex (HBR), elicited by intense electrical median nerve stimulation, is enhanced when the stimulated hand is close to the face, with the behavioural purpose to optimize self-protection from increased threat. Here we investigated whether such cortically mediated HBR facilitation can be influenced by prepulse inhibition (PPI), which is known to occur entirely at the subcortical level. Twenty healthy volunteers underwent HBR recordings in five experimental conditions. In conditions 1 and 2, the stimulated hand was held either near (1) or far (2) from the face, respectively. In conditions 3 and 4, stimulation of the hand near the face was preceded by a peri-liminal prepulse to the index finger of the contralateral hand held either near (3) or far from the face (4). In condition 5, participants self-triggered the stimulus eliciting the HBR. We observed a reproducible HBR in 14 out of 20 participants and measured onset latency and area of the HBR in orbicularis oculi muscles bilaterally. HBR area decreased and latency increased in condition 2 relative to condition 1; HBR area decreased and latency increased markedly in condition 3, and somewhat less in condition 4, relative to conditions 1 and 2; self-stimulation (condition 5) also suppressed HBRs, but less than prepulses. These findings indicate that PPI of the HBR is more robust than the cognitive modulation exerted by top-down cortical projections. Possibly, an attentional shift to a prepulse may serve to reduce blinking in response to perturbation when it is convenient, in a given situation, not to interrupt ongoing visual processing.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beniamina Mercante ◽  
Nicola Loi ◽  
Francesca Ginatempo ◽  
Monica Biggio ◽  
Andrea Manca ◽  
...  

AbstractThe hand-blink reflex (HBR) is a subcortical response, elicited by the electrical stimulation of the median nerve, whose magnitude is specifically modulated according to the spatial properties of the defensive peripersonal space (DPPS) of the face. For these reasons, the HBR is commonly used as a model to assess the DPPS of the face. Little is known on the effects induced by the activation of cutaneous afferents from the face on the DPPS of the face. Therefore, we tested the effect of non-painful transcutaneous trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) on the amplitude of the HBR. Fifteen healthy participants underwent HBR recording before and after 20 min of sham- and real-TNS delivered bilaterally to the infraorbital nerve in two separate sessions. The HBR was recorded bilaterally from the orbicularis oculi muscles, following non-painful median nerve stimulation at the wrist. The HBR amplitude was assessed in the “hand‐far” and “hand‐near” conditions, relative to the hand position in respect to the face. The amplitudes of the hand-far and hand-near HBR were measured bilaterally before and after sham- and real-TNS. Real-TNS significantly reduced the magnitude of the HBR, while sham-TNS had no significant effect. The inhibitory effect of TNS was of similar extent on both the hand-far and hand-near components of the HBR, which suggests an action exerted mainly at brainstem level.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document