Plastic responsiveness of motor cortex to paired associative stimulation depends on cerebellar input

Author(s):  
Asha Kishore ◽  
Praveen James ◽  
Traian Popa ◽  
Arun Thejaus ◽  
Parvathy Rajeswari ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilia Michou ◽  
Satish Mistry ◽  
John Rothwell ◽  
Shaheen Hamdy

2020 ◽  
Vol 238 (11) ◽  
pp. 2497-2506 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Bojsen-Møller ◽  
M. M. Ekblom ◽  
O. Tarassova ◽  
D. W. Dunstan ◽  
O. Ekblom

Abstract Paired associative stimulation (PAS) can induce plasticity in the motor cortex, as measured by changes in corticospinal excitability (CSE). This effect is attenuated in older and less active individuals. Although a single bout of exercise enhances PAS-induced plasticity in young, physically inactive adults, it is not yet known if physical activity interventions affect PAS-induced neuroplasticity in middle-aged inactive individuals. Sixteen inactive middle-aged office workers participated in a randomized cross-over design investigating how CSE and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) were affected by PAS preceded by 3 h of sitting (SIT), 3 h of sitting interrupted every 30 min by 3 min of frequent short bouts of physical activity (FPA) and 2.5 h of sitting followed by 25 min of moderate-intensity exercise (EXE). Transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) of the dominant abductor pollicis brevis to induce recruitment curves before and 5 min and 30 min post-PAS. Linear mixed models were used to compare changes in CSE using time and condition as fixed effects and subjects as random effects. There was a main effect of time on CSE and planned within-condition comparisons showed that CSE was significantly increased from baseline to 5 min and 30 min post-PAS, in the FPA condition, with no significant changes in the SIT or EXE conditions. SICI decreased from baseline to 5 min post-PAS, but this was not related to changes in CSE. Our findings suggest that in middle-aged inactive adults, FPAs may promote corticospinal neuroplasticity. Possible mechanisms are discussed.


2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 257
Author(s):  
E. Michou ◽  
S. Jefferson ◽  
S. Mistry ◽  
S. Singh ◽  
S. Hamdy

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 2260-2267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgi Batsikadze ◽  
Walter Paulus ◽  
Min-Fang Kuo ◽  
Michael A Nitsche

2011 ◽  
Vol 223 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Milanović ◽  
S.R. Filipović ◽  
S. Blesić ◽  
T.V. Ilić ◽  
S. Dhanasekaran ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 322
Author(s):  
T. MIma ◽  
Y. Ueki ◽  
S. Koganemaru ◽  
D. Ali ◽  
T. Nagamine ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 2674-2683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simranjit K. Sidhu ◽  
Maryam Pourmajidian ◽  
George M. Opie ◽  
John G. Semmler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document