scholarly journals First-Line Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin Followed by Gefitinib Maintenance Therapy Versus Gefitinib Monotherapy in East Asian Never-Smoker Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Nonsquamous Non–Small-cell Lung Cancer: Quality of Life Results From a Randomized Phase III Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Boye ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
Vichien Srimuninnimit ◽  
Jin Hyoung Kang ◽  
Chun-Ming Tsai ◽  
...  
1992 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 825-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Hürny ◽  
J. Bernhard ◽  
R. Joss ◽  
Y. Willems ◽  
F. Cavalli ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 2114-2122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan H. Schiller ◽  
Sudeshna Adak ◽  
David Cella ◽  
Russell F. DeVore ◽  
David H. Johnson

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of topotecan in combination with standard chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) conducted a phase III trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had measurable or assessable disease and an ECOG performance status of 0 to 2; stable brain metastases were allowed. All patients received four cycles of cisplatin and etoposide every 3 weeks (step 1; PE). Patients with stable or responding disease were then randomized to observation or four cycles of topotecan (1.5 mg/m2/d for 5 days, every 3 weeks; step 2). A total of 402 eligible patients were registered to step 1, and 223 eligible patients were registered to step 2 (observation, n = 111; topotecan, n = 112). RESULTS: Complete and partial response rates to induction PE were 3% and 32%, respectively. A 7% response rate was observed with topotecan (complete response, 2%; partial response, 5%). The median survival time for all 402 eligible patients was 9.6 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) from date of randomization on step 2 was significantly better with topotecan compared with observation (3.6 months v 2.3 months; P < .001). However, overall survival from date of randomization on step 2 was not significantly different between the observation and topotecan arms (8.9 months v 9.3 months; P = .43). Grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 50% and 3%, respectively, of PE patients in step 1 and 60% and 13% of topotecan patients in step 2. Grade 4/5 infection was observed in 4.6% of PE patients and 1.8% of topotecan patients. Grade 3/4 anemia developed in 22% of patients who received topotecan. No difference in quality of life between topotecan and observation was observed at any assessment time or for any of the subscale scores. CONCLUSION: Four cycles of PE induction therapy followed by four cycles of topotecan improved PFS but failed to improve overall survival or quality of life in extensive-stage SCLC. Four cycles of standard PE remains an appropriate first-line treatment for extensive-stage SCLC patients with good performance status.


2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (1/2) ◽  
pp. 105-117
Author(s):  
Satoshi Morita ◽  
Kunihiko Kobayashi ◽  
Yasuo Ohashi ◽  
Kenji Eguchi ◽  
Masahiko Shibuya ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (33) ◽  
pp. 8380-8388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christer Sederholm ◽  
Gunnar Hillerdal ◽  
Kristina Lamberg ◽  
Karl Kölbeck ◽  
Monika Dufmats ◽  
...  

PurposeThis phase III study compared overall survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) when treated with single-agent gemcitabine versus gemcitabine/carboplatin. Secondary objectives were to compare response, time to progression, toxicity, and quality of life.Patients and MethodsChemotherapy-naive patients received either gemcitabine alone (1,250 mg/m2on days 1 and 8; gemcitabine arm) or with carboplatin (area under the curve 5 on day 1; GC arm) every 21 days.ResultsDemographics and disease characteristics of 334 randomly assigned patients were comparable on both arms. An intent-to-treat analysis showed significantly better overall survival (log-rank P = .0205) and 2-year survival (15% v 5%; P = .009) favoring the GC arm. Per Cox multivariate analysis, only two covariates, treatment arm (GC v G) and baseline performance status (0 or 1 v 2), independently influenced survival. Per-protocol analyses showed significantly longer median time to progression (5.7 v 3.9 months; P = .0001) and significantly higher objective response rate (29.6 v 11.3%; P < .0001) in the GC arm. Grade 3 to 4 leucopenia and thrombocytopenia were significantly more pronounced in the GC arm (P for both variables < .001) but importantly without associated increases in fever, infection, bleeding, or hospitalizations. There was no discernible difference in global quality-of-life patterns between treatment arms.ConclusionIn advanced NSCLC, gemcitabine/carboplatin therapy resulted in significant survival benefit compared with single-agent gemcitabine without undue increase in toxicity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document