scholarly journals Time to Second-line Treatment and Subsequent Relative Survival in Older Patients With Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. e11-e25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric M. Ammann ◽  
Tait D. Shanafelt ◽  
Melissa C. Larson ◽  
Kara B. Wright ◽  
Bradley D. McDowell ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4819-4819
Author(s):  
Tadeusz Robak ◽  
Jerzy Z. Blonski ◽  
Marek Kasznicki ◽  
Joanna Gora-Tybor ◽  
Anna Dmoszynska ◽  
...  

Abstract Previously, we reported a study on efficacy and toxicity of cladribine (2-CdA) + prednisone (P) compared with chlorambucil (Chl) + P in previously untreated patients with progressive or symptomatic chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in a randomized multicenter trial (Blood2000, 96, 2723). Of 229 patients enrolled, 126 received 2-CdA+P and 103 received Chl+P. Here, we present the long-term follow-up and the results of subsequent treatment in refractory or relapsed patients. Patients with non responsive (NR) disease or with progression after 3 courses of 2-CdA + P or Chl+P or who relapsed earlier then 12 months after completing the treatment were switched to an alternative arm. Patients who relapsed later than 12 months from first remission (late relapse) were retreated with the same schedule that induced previous response. In 50 patients, non-responsive or with early relapse, treated originally with Chl+P who received 2-CdA+P as second line, complete response (CR) was achieved in 12 (24%) and overall response (OR) in 32 (64%). Twenty eight patients originally treated with 2-CdA+P received Chl+P and CR and OR was obtained in 1 (3,6%) and in 6 (21.4%), respectively (p=0.002 for both arms). Thirty three patients with late relapse were retreated with 2-CdA+P and 19 patients were retreated with Chl+P. OR (CR) was 54.6% (6.1%) and 47.4% (15.8%), respectively (p=0.34). The third line treatment was CHOP in both arms. Twenty seven patients from 2-CdA+P group and 37 patients from Chl+P group were treated with CHOP and only one patient responded. Median survival was 3.3 and 3.75 years, respectively (p=0.63). Secondary neoplasms were observed in 8 (6.4%) patients treated with 2-CdA+P and in 4 (3.9%) treated with Chl+P as first line treatment (p=0.6). Death rates have been similar in patients treated originally with 2-CdA+P 82 (64.6%) and Chl+P 69 (66.4%) (p=0.8). In conclusion, cladribine is significantly more effective as a second line treatment than chlorambucil. Both agents are similarly effective in retreatment of late relapsed patients. CHOP is of no value in patients previously treated with 2-CdA + P and with Chl + P. There is no significant difference in median survival of patients treated initially with Chl + P and 2-CdA + P.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4166-4166
Author(s):  
Anna Asklid ◽  
Agnes Mattsson ◽  
Einar Björgvinsson ◽  
Maria Winqvist ◽  
Sandra Eketorp Sylvan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) remains challenging. Major progress has been achieved with new agents such as ibrutinib and idelalisib. However relapses still occur with these agents or the treatment has to be withdrawn (Byrd et al, Blood 2015). Several new drugs have been or are currently tested in pivotal, non-controlled phase 2 trials on R/R CLL patients, with the majority of patients on 2nd line therapy following chemoimmunotherapy. Thus, reliable and matching historical data are required for comparison. We have previously reported on the outcome of heavily pretreated refractory patients (Eketorp Sylvan et al, Leuk Lymphoma 2014). The aim of the this study was to specifically investigate the outcome of 2nd line treatment prior to the access of small molecule-based treatment options, in consecutive patients from a well-defined geographical region, where almost complete follow-up exists and external referrals are minimal. Methods: Patients diagnosed with CLL were identified from the Cancer Registry in Stockholm (Nov 2002- Dec 2013) and patient files were reviewed individually to identify R/R patients. Efficacy and toxicity of 2nd line and later salvage therapies were recorded as well as long term follow-up. Patients were also grouped into treated in the early (Nov 2002-2007) and late time period (2008-2013) and compared regarding outcome. A multivariate cox proportional hazards model was perform to explore risk factors for outcome. Results: Chart review of 979 patients identified 148 consecutive, non-referred patients with R/R CLL undergoing various types of 2nd line salvage therapy. Median age was 73 years and 53% had Binet stage C. Del17p testing was available in 46% of patients of which 20.6% had del17p. Most frequently initiated treatments in 2nd line were chlorambucil (27.7%), FC (23.6%) and FCR (13.5%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 48.6% (3.4% CR). Median overall-survival (OS) from start of second line therapy was 37.9 months. Shorter OS was significantly associated with ECOG higher than 0, male sex, and age > 80 years. There was no difference in OS, PFS or ORR between those treated in the first vs the second time period of this study, despite that 2nd line use of chlorambucil decreased from 39% to 23% and use of FCR or BR increased from 0% to 26% from 2002-2007 to 2008-2013. However, median duration of response was significantly longer during the later time period (20.9 vs 10.3 months, p=0.035). During treatment, 50.7% of patients were hospitalized and 32.4% of patients experienced grade III-IV infections. Other AEs ≥ grade 3 occurred in 10.1% and 7.4% had bleeding events. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity, according to IWCLL-criteria, occurred in 0.7%/0.7% (Hb), 11.5%/8.8% (platelets) and 16.9%/36.5% (neutrophils). Toxicity was similar in both time periods. Conclusion: Our study describes the outcome of 2nd line treatment in R/R CLL in consecutive patients from a geographically well defined region with almost complete follow-up and without influence on the results from external referrals. Almost no improvement was observed in the outcome of 2nd line treatment during the 10 year period. Such real-world results may be used for comparison with data obtained in non-controlled phase 2 trials on new orphan drugs. Keywords: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Relapsed, Refractory, Clinical outcome Disclosures Asklid: Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Mattsson:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Björgvinsson:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Winqvist:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Eketorp Sylvan:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Søltoft:Janssen Cilag: Employment. Repits:Janssen Cilag: Employment. Diels:Janssen: Employment. Österborg:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Hansson:Jansse Cilag: Research Funding.


2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 563
Author(s):  
D. Medgenberg ◽  
L. Balleisen ◽  
W. Heit ◽  
W. Knauf ◽  
J. Weib ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3912-3912
Author(s):  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
William N. Harwin ◽  
Inés M. Macias-Pérez ◽  
Patrick S. Tucker ◽  
David M. Waterhouse ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3912 Background: Fludarabine (FLU), cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) or other FLU-based regimens have shown improvement in response rates, progression-free survival, and in some studies overall survival in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). However, a randomized trial of older patients demonstrated no improvement in progression-free and overall survival with FLU-based therapy (Eichhorst BF, et al: Blood 114; 3382, 2009). A recent retrospective analysis of serial CALGB trials (Woyach J, et al: ASH 2011) confirmed the lack of PFS and OS advantage of fludarabine in elderly patients but did find benefit of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab across all age groups. Ofatumumab (OFA) is a fully human immunoglobulin G1 kappa, monoclonal antibody that targets a unique epitope on the CD20 molecule. Pre-clinical data indicate that OFA has greater NK cell and monocyte-mediated killing, complement-dependent cytotoxicity and direct killing against CLL cells. Based on pre-clinical and clinical studies indicating possible increased efficacy of OFA in patients with CLL, our aim was to develop an antibody-only regimen for older patients and patients who refuse FLU-based regimens. Methods: Eligible patients had previously untreated, symptomatic CD20+ B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), ECOG PS of ≤ 2, and were either ≥ 65 years of age, or patients 18–64 years of age who had declined FLU-based regimens. All patients in this study received OFA as an IV infusion once weekly for a total of 8 weeks. To reduce the possibility of infusion reactions, the first dose of OFA was administered at a dose of 300 mg. If the initial 300-mg dose of OFA was well tolerated, without occurrence of any infusion associated AEs of ≥ grade 3, subsequent doses of OFA (i.e., Week 2 through Week 8) were given at a dose of 2000 mg. Eight weeks after the 8-week study treatment period ended, patients were assessed for response to the treatment. Patients who progressed received no further treatment. Patients who responded to the treatment or who did not have disease progression received maintenance therapy consisting of OFA at a dose of 2000 mg IV every 2 months for 2 years (for a total of 12 doses, in the absence of PD or intolerable toxicity) beginning 3 months after the last dose of OFA. Results: Between 8/2010 and 4/2011, 42 patients were enrolled and are included in this analysis. Patients were 57% male with median age 69 yrs (range: 47–88 yrs). Fourteen patients (33%) were < age 65. All but 1 patient had CLL; 1 patient had SLL. The median WBC at study entry was 41.1 (range 1.7–236.5). Rai stage at entry to study was Stage 0 = 8, Stage I = 8, Stage II – 4, Stage III – 10, Stage IV – 11. Interphase cytogenetics demonstrated 2/42 (5%) 17p-, 4/42 (10%) 11q-, 11/42 (26%) trisomy 12, 9/42 (21%) normal, 14/42 (33%) 13q-, and 2 (5%) unknown. To-date, 41 (98%) patients remain on study and 35 have completed 8 weeks of initial therapy with 24 (57%) having already begun maintenance therapy. Lymphocyte count normalized in 85% of patients at the end of the initial 8 weeks of therapy. Thirty patients have been evaluated for response according to IWCLL criteria (Hallek 2008): 13 patients (44%) achieved an objective response (CR, 0; PR, 13); 16 (53%) patients had SD; 1 patient (3%) had PD. SAEs were infrequent with 2 patients hospitalized for unrelated events: g2 fracture, g3 chest pain, g3 hematoma and g4 pulmonary emboli; 2 patients hospitalized for events possibly OFA-related had g2 fever, g3 anemia and g3 pneumonia. Only 1 patient experienced significant infusion-related toxicity that required repeat administration of the initial 300-mg dose instead of dose escalation at dose 2. Baseline FcγR polymorphisms for patients enrolled are currently being analyzed and will be presented. Conclusion: Single-agent OFA is a highly active and well tolerated front-line therapy for older patients with CLL or patients refusing FLU as evidenced by both early response and also ability of virtually all patients to proceed to maintenance therapy. A low incidence of serious infusion toxicity, infectious morbidity and other heme / non-heme toxicities was observed. Continued long-term assessment will further characterize the toxicity and efficacy of this single-agent OFA regimen in patients with CLL, as well as overall and progression-free survival rates. Disclosures: Flinn: GSK: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Ofatumumab in front-line CLL. Jones:Abbott Labs: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document