scholarly journals Noninvasive monitoring of mantle cell lymphoma by immunoglobulin gene next-generation sequencing in a phase 2 study of sequential chemo-radioimmunotherapy followed by autologous stem cell rescue

Author(s):  
A. Kumar ◽  
K.S. Bantilan ◽  
A.P. Jacob ◽  
A. Park ◽  
S.F. Schoninger ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 123 (11) ◽  
pp. 1665-1673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie E. Chang ◽  
Hailun Li ◽  
Mitchell R. Smith ◽  
Randy D. Gascoyne ◽  
Elisabeth M. Paietta ◽  
...  

Key Points VcR-CVAD produced high overall and CR rates in previously untreated MCL patients. No substantial difference in 3-year PFS or OS was observed in patients receiving ASCT compared with patients receiving maintenance rituximab.


HemaSphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (S1) ◽  
pp. 105-106
Author(s):  
P. Torka ◽  
N. Reddy ◽  
A. Kader ◽  
A. Groman ◽  
A. Hutson ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1363-1363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izidore S. Lossos ◽  
Francine Colleman ◽  
Gail Walker ◽  
Maricer Escalon ◽  
Joseph Rosenblatt ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an unfavorable sub-type of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) characterized by brief progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) of only 3–4 y. Although high-dose therapy and an autotransplant may prolong OS, it does not result in a long-term disease free survival. Therefore, there is a great need for novel treatment strategies for this lymphoma entity. Method: We conducted a phase-2 study in subjects with newly-diagnosed MCL to assess efficacy and safety of a novel intensive regimen R-MACLO-IVAM-T, a modification of a protocol designed by Magrath et al (JCO;14;925, 1996). Eligible patients had a confirmed diagnosis of MCL using WHO criteria, age 18–75 y, ECOG PS ≤2, adequate organ function and no history of HIV or prior cancer. Lymphoma extent at presentation was assessed by standard staging procedures including colonoscopy. Prior to initiating thalidomide, subjects were enrolled into S.T.E.P.S.® program. Therapy consisted of R-MACLO (rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV on d 1, Adriamycin, 45 mg/m2 IV on d 1, cyclophosphamide, 800 mg/m2 IV on d 1 and 200 mg/m2/d on d 2–5, vincristine, 1.5 mg/m2 on d 1 and d 8 capped to 2mg, methotrexate, 1.2 g/m2 IV on d 10 IV over 1 h followed by 5.52 g/m2 over 23 h followed by leucovorin 36 h later. G-CSF was begun on d 13. When ANC was >1.5x10e9/L R-IVAM was begun including rituximab, 375 mg/m2 IV d 1, cytarabine, 2.0 g/m2 IV every 12 h on d 1 and 2, ifosfamide, 1.5 g/m2 d 1–5 with mesna and etoposide, 60 mg/m2 d 1–5. Therapy was repeated 14 d after hospital discharge. After recovery from cycle-2 subjects were re-staged and responses assessed by standard criteria. Subjects achieving CR at the end of therapy received thalidomide, 200 mg/d until lymphoma-recurrence or toxicity. Results: 18 subjects enrolled; 17 are evaluable. Median age was 59 y (range, 44–73y), all had ≥stage-3 MCL with bone marrow involvement in 15 and gastrointestinal involvement in 9. Distribution according to IPI: 0–1 factor, 2; 2 factors, 7; 3 factors, 6; and ≥4 factors, 3. 16 subjects had diffuse variant and 2, blastic variant. 14 subjects completed the 4 cycles of therapy; the therapy was stopped after 2 and 3 cycles, respectively, in the remaining two patients. 1 subject died of septicemia on d 8 of first cycle. All subjects completing ≥1 cycle achieved CR. No subject relapsed and 15 are alive with a median follow-up of 18 mo (range, 4–40 mo). One patient died at 38m from non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed 19m post MCL diagnosis. Common severe toxicities were grade-3–4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia in 48%, 21% and 24% of R-MACLO cycles and in 81%, 84% and 40% of R-IVAM cycles. There were 10 bacteremias in 65 cycles 9 of which were after R-IVAM therapy. 5 episodes of reversible grade-1–2 renal toxicity occurred after methotrexate. 5 subjects receiving thalidomide had dose-reductions because of neutropenia. Conclusions The R-MACLO-IVAM-T therapy results in a high overall response rate with 100% CR and no relapses at median follow-up of 18 months. The contribution of each element of the regimen to this outcome requires study. Further clinical trials are suggested.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2751-2751
Author(s):  
Michael Wang ◽  
Leslie Popplewell ◽  
Robert H. Collins ◽  
Jane N. Winter ◽  
Andre Goy ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2751 Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, often aggressive form of B-cell lymphoma. In relapsed MCL, bortezomib is associated with an overall response rate (ORR) of 32% and a median time to progression of 6.7 months (Ann Oncol 2009;20:520-5). The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is frequently dysregulated in hematologic malignancies. In a phase 2 study of relapsed/refractory lymphomas, including MCL, reported by Witzig et al, the oral mTOR inhibitor everolimus showed antitumor efficacy and acceptable tolerability (Leukemia 2011;25:341-7). PILLAR-1 (PIvotaL Lymphoma triAls of RAD001-1) was a phase 2 study conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of everolimus monotherapy in patients with previously treated MCL refractory or intolerant to bortezomib. Methods: PILLAR-1 was a US, multicenter, open-label, 2-stage, single-arm, phase 2 study of oral everolimus 10 mg/day for adults with pathologically confirmed MCL who were refractory or intolerant to bortezomib and received ≥1 other antineoplastic therapy. Patients were considered refractory to bortezomib if they had documented radiological progression on or within 12 months of the last bortezomib dose when given alone or on or within 12 months of the last dose of the last component of a combination therapy that included bortezomib. Patients were considered intolerant to bortezomib if they discontinued bortezomib for toxicity (documentation was required). Primary endpoint was ORR assessed by the investigator according to the modified response criteria for malignant lymphoma. To declare a positive study, ≥8 responders out of 57 patients were required. Secondary endpoints included progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS, respectively), duration of response (DOR), and safety. Results: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled between August 2008 and January 2011. Median age was 68 years (range, 50 to 83 years), 77.6% were male, 19.0% and 67.2% had stage III and IV disease, respectively, 20.7% received autologous stem cell transplant, 74.1% received ≥3 prior treatment regimens, 84.5% were bortezomib refractory, and 13.8% were bortezomib intolerant; 1 patient (1.7%) was considered neither bortezomib refractory nor intolerant as disease progression occurred >12 months after the last bortezomib dose. Median duration of follow-up was 23.2 months. As of April 20, 2012, all patients discontinued study treatment, most commonly due to disease progression (51.7%) or adverse events (AEs) (39.7%). Median duration of everolimus exposure was 2.9 months (range, 0.4 to 16.9 months). The study did not meet its primary objective as only 5 objective responses per local review (all partial responses [PR]) were observed, resulting in an ORR of 8.6% (90% confidence interval [CI], 3.5% to 17.3%). The DOR ranged from 21 to 338+ days. Per local review, 35 patients (60.3%) experienced stable disease (SD). The median duration of disease control in the 40 patients with PR or SD was 5.7 months (range, 1.7+ to 16.7+ months). Median PFS per local review was 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 6.1 months). In a sensitivity analysis based on central radiology review, 6 patients experienced PR (ORR, 10.3%; 90% CI, 4.6% to 19.4%), the DOR ranged from 49+ to 401+ days, 30 patients experienced SD (51.7%), and median PFS was 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 7.1 months). Median OS was 16.9 months (95% CI, 14.4 to 29.9 months). Four patients proceeded to stem cell transplantation. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic AEs were experienced by 70.7% of patients; those that occurred in ≥5% of patients were abdominal pain (8.6%), pneumonia (8.6%), fatigue (6.9%), hyperglycemia (6.9%), asthenia (5.2%), diarrhea (5.2%), dyspnea (5.2%), hyponatremia (5.2%), and pneumonitis (5.2%). Based on laboratory values, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred in 13.8% of patients each, and anemia occurred in 8.6%. Conclusions: In this phase 2 study, everolimus monotherapy demonstrated modest activity in heavily pretreated patients with bortezomib-refractory MCL. Future studies exploring everolimus as monotherapy in a less refractory population or in combination with other targeted therapies in refractory MCL are warranted. Disclosures: Wang: Novartis: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Everolimus is an mTOR inhibitor indicated in the US for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer in combination with letrozole after failure of letrozole or anastrozole; adults with progressive pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors that are unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic; adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma after failure of treatment with sunitinib or sorafenib; adults with renal angiomyolipoma and tuberous sclerosis complex not requiring immediate surgery; and adults and children aged 3 years or greater with subependymal giant cell astrocytoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex who require therapeutic intervention but are not candidates for curative surgical resection. Winter:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Talon: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Caremark/CVS: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy; Medalis: Consultancy. Goy:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Robeva:Novartis: Employment. Pirotta:Novartis: Employment. Fan:Novartis: Employment. Klimovsky:Novartis: Employment.


2014 ◽  
Vol 165 (4) ◽  
pp. 510-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Wang ◽  
Leslie L. Popplewell ◽  
Robert H. Collins ◽  
Jane N. Winter ◽  
Andre Goy ◽  
...  

Haematologica ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 138-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rémy Gressin ◽  
Nicolas Daguindau ◽  
Adrian Tempescul ◽  
Anne Moreau ◽  
Sylvain Carras ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document