Medical follow-up of obesity surgery patients: development of a monitoring sheet for general practitioners, “baria check”

2021 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. S702
Author(s):  
M. Guiho ◽  
D. Bergeat ◽  
L. Lacaze ◽  
E. Allory ◽  
R. Thibault
2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement 32) ◽  
pp. 175
Author(s):  
M. Houot ◽  
C. Charpentier ◽  
J. Garric ◽  
P. Welfringer ◽  
G. Audibert ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 509-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pim A. J. Luijsterburg ◽  
Arianne P. Verhagen ◽  
Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo ◽  
Hans J. M. M. van den Hoogen ◽  
Wilco C. Peul ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 69-72
Author(s):  
Marcos Vinicius Ribeiro dos SANTOS ◽  
Gustavo Enrique Correia FERREIRA ◽  
Eduardo Cirne Pedrosa de OLIVEIRA ◽  
Flavio KREIMER ◽  
Josemberg Marins CAMPOS ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION: Despite of benefits of bariatric surgery for obesity treatment, the procedure may be related to some complications. AIM: Analyze studies to address the relation between nephrolithiasis and bariatric surgery. METHODS: Ten papers about this theme were selected from 2005-2013 in Pubmed, describing the relation of nephrolithiasis or their risk factors with several types of bariatric surgery. RESULTS: Retrospective studies with minimal follow-up of three years demonstrated 7,65% in surgery patients and 4,63% non-surgery with nephrolithiasis (p<0,05). Prospective studies (8 of 10) revealed large percentage of calculi appearing and significant increase in oxaluria. CONCLUSION: There is correlation between obesity surgery and nephrolithiasis.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0244485
Author(s):  
Caroline Verhestraeten ◽  
Gijs Weijers ◽  
Daphne Debleu ◽  
Agnieszka Ciarka ◽  
Marc Goethals ◽  
...  

Aims Creation of an algorithm that includes the most important parameters (history, clinical parameters, and anamnesis) that can be linked to heart failure, helping general practitioners in recognizing heart failure in an early stage and in a better follow-up of the patients. Methods and results The algorithm was created using a consensus-based Delphi panel technique with fifteen general practitioners and seven cardiologists from Belgium. The method comprises three iterations with general statements on diagnosis, referral and treatment, and follow-up. Consensus was obtained for the majority of statements related to diagnosis, referral, and follow-up, whereas a lack of consensus was seen for treatment statements. Based on the statements with good and perfect consensus, an algorithm for general practitioners was assembled, helping them in diagnoses and follow-up of heart failure patients. The diagnosis should be based on three essential pillars, i.e. medical history, anamnesis and clinical examination. In case of suspected heart failure, blood analysis, including the measurement of NT-proBNP levels, can already be performed by the general practitioner followed by referral to the cardiologist who is then responsible for proper diagnosis and initiation of treatment. Afterwards, a multidisciplinary health care process between the cardiologist and the general practitioner is crucial with an important role for the general practitioner who has a key role in the up-titration of heart failure medication, down-titration of the dose of diuretics and to assure drug compliance. Conclusions Based on the consensus levels of statements in a Delphi panel setting, an algorithm is created to help general practitioners in the diagnosis and follow-up of heart failure patients.


1993 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 414-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. Pether ◽  
B. A. Johnson ◽  
G. O'Donoghue ◽  
J. Connolly

Letters from psychiatrists to general practitioners (GPs) should provide an appropriate content in a format which is easy to write and assimilate. For content, GPs have requested “key items” (diagnosis, suicide risk, treatment, prognosis and follow-up), and an explanation which is educational (Williams & Wallace, 1974; Pullen & Yellowlees, 1985; Margo, 1982). For format, GPs preferred a one page letter with two or three sub-headings in a survey based on one fictitious case (Yellowless & Pullen, 1984). Real letters from psychiatrists in one district averaged one and three quarter pages with four subheadings (Prasher et al, 1992). GPs' opinions about actual changes in the format and content of letters sent to them have not been reported.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document