In malnourished adolescent with anorexia nervosa, Cockroft-Gault formula is the most relevant formula to estimate renal function

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1914-1918
Author(s):  
Camille Trahan ◽  
Anne-Laure Lapeyraque ◽  
Marc Sznajder ◽  
Jean-Yves Frappier ◽  
Olivier Jamoulle ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Ogawa ◽  
Y An ◽  
S Ikeda ◽  
Y Aono ◽  
K Doi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly coexist with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are recommended for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), and worsening renal function (WRF) as well as CKD is an important issue in using NOAC. However, little is known about the clinical outcomes of patients after WRF. Purpose We aimed to investigate outcomes after WRF in AF patients. Methods The Fushimi AF Registry is a community-based prospective survey of the AF patients in our city. Follow-up data including prescription status were available for 4,441 patients. Of them, 1,890 patients who have baseline and at least 1 follow-up creatinine clearance (CrCl) measurements, estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula, were analyzed in the present study. WRF was defined as a decrease of ≥20% from baseline CrCl measurement at any time point during follow-up. We evaluated demographics and outcomes after WRF in AF patients. Results During the median follow-up period of 2,194 days, mean CrCl decrease of 2.2 ml/min/year was observed and WRF occurred in 981 patients (51.9%). Patients with WRF were significantly more often female (with vs. without WRF; 40.3% vs. 35.4%; p=0.03), older (73.4 vs. 71.1 years of age; p<0.01), more often paroxysmal type (49.9% vs. 47.1%; p<0.01), and more likely to have prior stroke (17.9% vs. 12.7%; p<0.01), heart failure (30.8% vs. 24.8%; p<0.01), diabetes (31.7% vs. 27.1%; p=0.03), and coronary artery disease (19.9% vs. 12.1%; p<0.01) than those without WRF. Co-existing of CKD and mean CrCl at baseline were comparable (37.4% vs. 36.9%; p=0.82, 65.3 vs. 63.5 ml/min; p=0.66, respectively). Mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was significantly higher in WRF patients (3.55 vs. 3.03; p<0.01). On landmark analysis, all-cause mortality occurred in 135 patients (8.6 /100 person-years) after WRF and 82 patients (1.7 /100 person-years) without WRF, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 6.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.33–9.50; p<0.01), adjusted by sex, age, body weight, serum creatinine, type of AF, oral anticoagulant prescription and comorbidities. Stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 45 patients after WRF (3.0 /100 person-years) and 78 (1.7 /100 person-years) patients without WRF (adjusted HR 1.60 [95% CI, 1.04–2.49; p=0.03]) (Figure). Conclusions AF patients after WRF had higher incidence of various adverse events. Incidence of Adverse Outcomes Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Other. Main funding source(s): The Practical Research Project for Life-Style related Diseases including Cardiovascular Diseases and Diabetes Mellitus from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development. Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer Healthcare, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis Pharma, MSD, Sanofi-Aventis, and Takeda Pharmaceutical.


1994 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 416-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.H.M. Quadri ◽  
J. Bernardini ◽  
A. Greenberg ◽  
S. Laifer ◽  
A. Syed ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 466-467
Author(s):  
A. Rajot ◽  
L. Di Lodovico ◽  
M. Duquesnoy ◽  
M. Dicembre ◽  
M. Zaidan ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2521-2521 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. G. Poole ◽  
M. J. Dooley ◽  
D. Rischin

2521 Background: The dose of carboplatin is usually calculated using the Calvert formula, with various bedside estimates utilized rather than directly measured GFR. The 4-v MDRD equation (Levey AS, et al. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 247–254) is now advocated as the routine method of estimating renal function from serum creatinine in all patients. Adoption in clinical practice is occurring despite lack of validation in oncology patients. The aim of this study was to compare carboplatin doses derived from the Calvert formula using measured GFR and the estimates of the 4-v MDRD equation and other established estimates. Methods: GFR was determined using technetium-99m diethyl triamine penta-acetic acid (Tc99mDTPA) clearance. Serum creatinine (Jaffe method) was measured and GFR estimates calculated using 4-v MDRD, Cockcroft and Gault formula (CGF), Wright, Martin, and Jelliffe (JF) formulae. Carboplatin doses were calculated using the Calvert formula, targeting an area under the curve of 7mg.ml- 1.min-1. Results: GFR was measured in 510 adult oncology patients (323 male, 187 female, mean age 63 years, range 17–87 years, mean GFR 84 mL/min, range 16–205 mL/min). The mean (range) carboplatin dose was 765 mg (287–1,610 mg), 681 mg (237–1,306 mg), 674 mg (249–2,044 mg), 721 mg (261–1,536mg), 741 mg (261–2,128mg), 620 mg (244- 1,329 mg) for measured GFR, 4-v MDRD, CGF, Wright, Martin, and JF formulas respectively. The accuracy (% within 20% of ‘true’ dose) was 58%, 63%, 73%, 72% and 49% for 4-v MDRD, CGF, Wright, Martin, and JF formulas respectively. Carboplatin doses derived using the 4-v MDRD estimate of GFR become increasingly less accurate with increasing GFR (see table ). All other formulas performed similarly. Conclusions: The 4-v MDRD equation resulted in an imprecise estimation of carboplatin doses with the degree of variability dependant on the level of renal function. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2009 ◽  
Vol 57 (9) ◽  
pp. 1638-1643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renaud Péquignot ◽  
Joël Belmin ◽  
Sophie Chauvelier ◽  
Jean-Yves Gaubert ◽  
Cécile Konrat ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 114
Author(s):  
Hosne Ara Begum ◽  
Mahbub Ur Rahman ◽  
Samira Sharmin ◽  
Jesmin Ferdous ◽  
Jamiul Hossain

<p><strong><em>Background</em></strong><em>:</em><strong> </strong>DTPA renogram is an accepted method to measure glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of the kidneys. The function of an ectopic kidney varies on the basis of its size, shape, position and rotation. This may lead to variation in tissue attenuation and error in computed GFR and differential renal function (DRF) of each kidney. The objectives of this study was to assess  the changes in the GFR measurement of an ectopic kidney in a dual head gamma camera using anterior and posterior imaging process and its influence on quantification of total GFR.</p><p><strong><em>Patients and Method:</em></strong><strong> </strong>A Total<strong> </strong>20 patients having one ectopic pelvic kidney and other normal positioning kidney were enrolled in the study. DTPA renogram images were acquired on a dual head gamma camera (Symbia T2) in anterior and posterior views simultaneously. Both anterior and posterior images data were used separately to compute the GFR. Three sets of total GFR of both kidneys were calculated separately. In set I, total GFR (ant) is equal to sum of both kidneys GFR in anterior imaging process, in set II total GFR (post) is equal to sum of both kidneys GFR in posterior imaging process and in set III total GFR (ectopic .ant + normal. post) is equal to sum of the GFR of normal kidney on posterior image and the GFR of ectopic kidney on anterior image. These three sets of total GFRs were compared with the patient’s eGFR measured by Cockcroft Gault formula.</p><p><strong><em>Result:</em></strong> Mean age of the patient was 36.9 ± 14.6 years (range 18-70 years). Mean total GFR (ant)   was 89.2±11.6 ml/min, total GFR (post) was 82.9±13.4 ml/min and total GFR (ectopic .ant + normal.post) was 102.5±15.9 ml/min. Mean eGFR is 101.93±24.9ml/min. When these three sets of DTPA assisted GFR compare with eGFR the Pearson’s correlation coefficient <em>r=</em> 0.45, 0.55 (P&lt;0.05) for GFR (ant) and GFR (post) respectively whereas, in case of GFR (ectopic .ant + normal.post) correlation coefficient <em>r=</em> 0.8 (P&lt;0.01).</p><p><strong><em>Conclusion:</em></strong> The GFR of ectopic kidney as calculated from the anterior data was significantly higher in comparison to the GFR calculated from the posterior data.</p><p>Bangladesh J. Nuclear Med. 20(2): 115-118, July 2017</p>


2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
TS Shima ◽  
A Khatun ◽  
F Yeasmin ◽  
S Ferdousi ◽  
K Kirtania ◽  
...  

Serum cystatin C is a new promising marker of renal function. The aim of this study was to analyze serum cystatin C as a better predictor of renal function in diabetic nephropathy. In 60 diagnosed diabetic patients, serum cystatin C and serum creatinine were assessed. Glomerular filtration rate was estimated based on the cystatin C concentration according to Cockcroft- Gault formula and based on serum creatinine concentration according to Larsson formula. DTPA-GFR (Diethylenetriamene pentaacetate Renogram) was done as reference standard. The cross tabulation of DTPA-GFR was done with eGFR- creatinine and eGFRcystatin C. The calculated sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of eGFR- creatinine were 85%, 87.2% and 85% respectively. The eGFR- cystatin C showed higher sensitivity, specificity and accuracy than eGFR- creatinine in studied diabetic subjects. The cystatin C showed more significant correlation, r=0.78, p<0.001 than serum creatinine, r=0.59, p<0.001 with DTPA-GFR in diabetic patients. This study demonstrates that serum cystatin C may be used for early prediction for renal function impairment in diabetic kidney disease. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjmb.v4i1.13777 Bangladesh J Med Biochem 2011; 4(1): 16-20


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document