An Uncertain Future for Clinical Oncology Training in the UK

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-229
Author(s):  
M. Kosmin ◽  
S. Ahmad
2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. e239-e242
Author(s):  
Y. Tsang ◽  
N. Roberts ◽  
S. Wickers ◽  
H. Nisbet
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. e50-e53
Author(s):  
J. Best ◽  
T. Starkey ◽  
A. Chatterjee ◽  
D. Fackrell ◽  
L. Pettit ◽  
...  

Arts ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Collins ◽  
Linsley

Stolen Voices is a research enquiry that uses listening as both methodology and material. Stolen Voices develops techniques for ‘listening in’ and eavesdropping to help articulate an epistemology of place through sonic frameworks. A core motivation for the listening is a semi-fictional story we tell ourselves (and anyone else who is listening): an ‘event’ has taken place along the East Coast of the United Kingdom (UK), and we have been tasked with figuring out what has happened. While the specifics of the event might be difficult to pin down, the urgency of the investigation is fuelled by concrete concerns found in the UK edgelands, at the border/margin of the country: the uncertain future of the UK’s relationship with Europe; the effects of climate change on coastal landscapes; the waning of industries like manufacturing and coal extraction; the oil industry in crisis; the rise of global shipping infrastructures. By using a semi-fictional framework, we move away from mapping techniques like data-sonification towards a methodology that embraces gaps and inventive excesses while insisting on the importance of making an account. Through listening, we foster attention to contingencies and indeterminacies and their relationships to prevailing structures and knowledge hierarchies. Stolen Voices asks: what is the relationship between a listener and what is heard? How can listening attune us to the complexities of contemporary political, economic, ecological and social processes? How did we get to where we are now, and how, through listening, can we seek out levers for change? What do the rhythms and atmospheres of specific geographic locations inform or reveal about history? Evolving over several years, in response to what we hear, the investigation necessarily proceeds slowly. In this article, we unfold our methodological processes for the detection of sound, voices, atmosphere and affect. We use creative-critical writing to evidence the construction of a research investigation focused on the act of listening as a spatial practice and necessarily collective endeavour.


2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Saunders ◽  
M. Ajaz ◽  
E. Staples ◽  
C. Butler ◽  
K. Drinkwater ◽  
...  

European View ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-179
Author(s):  
Andrew Glencross

This article examines the possibilities for negotiating the UK–EU health-security relationship after 2020. Health security, in the sense of measures to prevent and mitigate health emergencies, had played a marginal role in the UK–EU negotiations, but COVID-19 has greatly amplified this policy area’s significance. At the beginning of the pandemic, Brussels introduced significant measures to promote public health sovereignty, notably joint procurement and stockpiling of personal protective equipment. The UK went against the grain by limiting its involvement in joint procurement at a time when other countries were rushing to participate. UK participation in some EU health measures is possible on existing terms, but not joint procurement. This leaves the UK facing an uncertain future because of the potential risks associated with not participating in EU programmes, notably in terms of access to personal protective equipment supplies and possible market distortion resulting from new EU policies promoting stockpiling and reshoring. The politicisation of health security thus adds another complication to the post-Brexit EU–UK relationship.


2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 375-396
Author(s):  
Sarah Ellen Percival ◽  
Mark Gaterell ◽  
David Hutchinson

Abstract The effective communication of flood risk offers the opportunity to ensure communities can adapt and respond appropriately to changing local conditions. At a time of diminishing resources, such local responses, which can empower communities and make them more resilient to uncertain future flood events, are vital. The most general and accessible type of flood communication are flood risk visualisations, i.e. pre-prepared emergency flood maps. However, evidence suggests there is much we can do to improve their ability to communicate the complexities of flood risk to a range of stakeholders. This paper considers the development of flood risk visualisation approaches in the UK, presenting findings from a series of targeted workshops over twelve months, where the needs and criteria of stakeholder groups for effective flood risk visualisation were assessed via co-creative processes. Key stakeholders included local authorities, emergency responders, vulnerable homeowners, Environment Agency, business owners and, crucially, communities. These users need certain requirements to be considered in order for future flood risk visualisation to be effective, in particular simplicity, a central hub of information, different visuals available for the same data sets/problems, different maps available for different users, consistent terminology and integrated community knowledge (e.g. local flood groups/help).


Food Policy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 101808
Author(s):  
Craig Prescott ◽  
Manuela Pilato ◽  
Claudio Bellia

1995 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian W. Ilbery ◽  
Ian R. Bowler

The UK has been more adversely affected by changes in the horticultural industry of the European Union than many other member countries. Both orchard and glasshouse production have progressed little since the 1970s and only a small proportion of growers have taken advantage of a recent government scheme designed to inject capital into the industry. The future for UK growers is not good and up to 75% could go out of production altogether over the next 10 to 20 years unless their competitiveness can be improved, for instance by upgrading the marketing system in the UK.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Lyddon

Coastal flooding is rated as the second highest risk of civil emergency in the UK, and can cause damage to coastal and estuarine infrastructure, communities, ecosystems, and even loss of life. Hydrodynamic, numerical modelling tools are used to identify regions susceptible to coastal flooding under current and future climate conditions. Modelling procedures and data inputs can lead to a range of uncertainties that need to be quantified for the simulations to be meaningful. Reported public scepticism of coastal hazard forecasting and flood warning accuracy may be due in some part to the way that flood dynamics and uncertainties in the computer model simulations of flood hazard are communicated to the end-users. The briefing explores key uncertainties in flooding predictions, and how these can be better communicated to the public and stakeholders. Improved communication can help to increase awareness and encourage behaviour change to build trust in warnings and forecasts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document