scholarly journals Assessment of a high-order shock-capturing central-difference scheme for hypersonic turbulent flow simulations

2021 ◽  
Vol 230 ◽  
pp. 105134
Author(s):  
Luca Sciacovelli ◽  
Donatella Passiatore ◽  
Paola Cinnella ◽  
Giuseppe Pascazio
1999 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiyuki Hayase

Monotonic convergence of numerical solutions with the computational grid refinement is an essential requirement in estimating the grid-dependent uncertainty of computational fluid dynamics. If the convergence is not monotonic, the solution could be erroneously regarded as convergent at the local extremum with respect to some measure of the error. On the other hand, if the convergence is exactly monotonic, estimation methods such as Richardson extrapolation properly evaluate the uncertainty of numerical solutions. This paper deals with the characterization of numerical schemes based on the property of the monotonic convergence of numerical solutions. Two typical discretization schemes of convective terms were considered; the second-order central difference scheme and the third-order Leonard’s QUICK scheme. A fully developed turbulent flow through a square duct was calculated via a SIMPLER based finite volume method without a turbulence model. The convergence of the numerical solution with the grid refinement was investigated for the mean flow property as well as fluctuations. The comparison of convergence process between the discretization schemes has revealed that the QUICK scheme results in preferable monotonic convergence, while the second-order central difference scheme undergoes non-monotonic convergence. The latter possibly misleads the determination of convergence with the grid refinement, or causes trouble in applying the Richardson extrapolation procedure to estimate the numerical uncertainty.


Geophysics ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (9) ◽  
pp. 1457-1465 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Dablain

The significance of entropy‐like terms is examined within the context of the finite‐difference modeling of acoustic wave propagation. The numerical implications of dissipative mechanisms are tested for performance within two very distinct differencing algorithms. The two schemes which are reviewed with and without dissipation are (1) the standard central‐difference scheme, and (2) the Lax‐Wendroff two‐step scheme. Numerical results are presented comparing the short‐wavelength response of these schemes. In order to achieve this response, the linearized version of an exploding one‐dimensional source is used.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Wang ◽  
Yongbin Ge

A high-order compact difference scheme for solving the two-dimensional (2D) elliptic problems is proposed by including compact approximations to the leading truncation error terms of the central difference scheme. A multigrid method is employed to overcome the difficulties caused by conventional iterative methods when they are used to solve the linear algebraic system arising from the high-order compact scheme. Numerical experiments are conducted to test the accuracy and efficiency of the present method. The computed results indicate that the present scheme achieves the fourth-order accuracy and the effect of the multigrid method for accelerating the convergence speed is significant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document