“A bridge too far”: exploring women’s experiences obtaining abortion care before and after policy reform in Prince Edward Island

Contraception ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 344
Author(s):  
M El Mowafi ◽  
K LaRoche ◽  
AM Foster
Contraception ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 401-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Blanchard ◽  
Jill L. Meadows ◽  
Hialy R. Gutierrez ◽  
Curtiss PS Hannum ◽  
Ella F. Douglas-Durham ◽  
...  

Contraception ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 292-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liza Fuentes ◽  
Sharon Lebenkoff ◽  
Kari White ◽  
Caitlin Gerdts ◽  
Kristine Hopkins ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. e005618
Author(s):  
Mariana Romero ◽  
Rodolfo Gomez Ponce de Leon ◽  
Luiz Francisco Baccaro ◽  
Berenise Carroli ◽  
Hedieh Mehrtash ◽  
...  

IntroductionAbortion-related complications are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among women in many Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries. The objective of this study was to characterise abortion-related complication severity, describe the management of these complications and report women’s experiences with abortion care in selected countries of the Americas region.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study of 70 health facilities across six countries in the region. We collected data on women’s characteristics including socio-demographics, obstetric history, clinical information, management procedures and using Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing (ACASI) survey the experience of abortion care. Descriptive bivariate analysis was performed for women’s characteristics, management of complications and reported experiences of abortion care by severity of complications, organised in five hierarchical mutually exclusive categories based on indicators present at assessment. Generalised linear estimation models were used to assess the association between women’s characteristics and severity of complications.ResultsWe collected data on 7983 women with abortion-related complications. Complications were classified as mild (46.3%), moderate (49.5%), potentially life-threatening (3.1%), near-miss cases (1.1%) and deaths (0.2%). Being single, having a gestational age of ≥13 weeks and having expelled products of conception before arrival at the facility were significantly associated with experiencing severe maternal outcomes compared with mild complications.Management of abortion-related complications included both uterotonics and uterine evacuation for two-thirds of the women while one-third received uterine evacuation only. Surgical uterine evacuation was performed in 93.2% (7437/7983) of women, being vacuum aspiration the most common one (5007/7437, 67.4%).Of the 327 women who completed the ACASI survey, 16.5% reported having an induced abortion, 12.5% of the women stated that they were not given explanations regarding their care nor were able to ask questions during their examination and treatment with percentages increasing with the severity of morbidity.ConclusionsThis is one of the first studies using a standardised methodology to measure severity of abortion-related complications and women’s experiences with abortion care in LAC. Results aim to inform policies and programmes addressing sexual and reproductive rights and health in the region.


Contraception ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 427-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Meadows ◽  
H Gutierrez ◽  
CPS Hannum ◽  
E Douglas-Durham ◽  
K Blanchard ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Angele Musabyimana ◽  
Tiffany Lundeen ◽  
Elizabeth Butrick ◽  
Felix Sayinzoga ◽  
Bernard Ngabo Rwabufigiri ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 2135-2146
Author(s):  
Marianne Kjelsvik ◽  
Ragnhild J Tveit Sekse ◽  
Asgjerd Litleré Moi ◽  
Elin M Aasen ◽  
Per Nortvedt ◽  
...  

Background: While being prepared for abortions, some women experience decisional ambivalence during their encounters with health personnel at the hospital. Women’s experiences with these encounters have rarely been examined. Objective: The objective of this study was to explore ambivalent abortion-seeking women’s experiences of their encounters with health personnel. Research design: The data were collected in individual interviews and analysed with dialogical narrative analyses. Participants and research context: A total of 13 women (aged 18–36 years), who were uncertain of whether to terminate their pregnancies during the first trimester, were interviewed before and after they made their decisions. The participants were recruited at six Norwegian outpatient clinics. Ethical considerations: Approval was granted by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics. Findings: The ambivalent pregnant women sought to make autonomous decisions while simultaneously involving their closest confidants and health personnel in the process. The following three types of narratives of women’s experiences with encounters with health personnel were identified: the respected women; the identified women; and the abandoned women. Discussion: The findings are discussed in terms of the ambivalent pregnant woman’s autonomous responsibility in considering an abortion and how her autonomy can be enabled or impaired during encounters with health personnel. Conclusion and implication: Although the women considered themselves autonomous and responsible for their final decisions, they wished health personnel were involved in their situations. The health personnel contributed by enabling or disabling the possibility of decision-making in accordance with the women’s values. The findings indicate that health personnel who care for women considering abortions must be trained in dialogical competence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document