From correlation-consistent to polarization-consistent basis sets estimation of NMR spin–spin coupling constant in the B3LYP Kohn–Sham basis set limit

2008 ◽  
Vol 461 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 33-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teobald Kupka
Author(s):  
Yuriy Yu. Rusakov ◽  
Irina L Rusakova

This paper presents a new method of generating property-energy consistent (PEC) basis sets that can be applied to any arbitrary molecular property. The PEC method generates a basis set that...


1996 ◽  
Vol 74 (8) ◽  
pp. 1524-1525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Guy M. Bernard ◽  
Frank E. Hruska

An excellent linear correlation (r = 0.9999) exists between the spin–spin coupling constants 1J(1H,13C), in benzene dissolved in four solvents (R. Laatikainen et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 11006 (1995)) and Ando's solvation dielectric function, ε/(ε – 1). The solvents are cyclohexane, carbon disulfide, pyridine, and acetone. 1J(1H,13C)for gaseous benzene is predicted to be 156.99(2) Hz at 300 K. Key words: spin–spin coupling constants, 1J(1H,13C) for benzene in the vapor phase; spin–spin coupling constants, solvent dielectric constant dependence of 1J(1H,13C) in benzene; benzene, estimate of 1J(1H,13C) in the vapor; nuclear magnetic resonance, estimate of 1J(1H,13C) in gaseous benzene.


1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 927-933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Rudy Sebastian ◽  
Christian Beaulieu

The inversion potentials, obtained from STO-3G, STO-3G(*), 3-21G, 3-21G(*), and 4-31G basis sets, are reported for thianthrene and thioxanthene, molecules in which both or only one of the methylene groups have been replaced by sulfur in 9,10-dihydroanthracene. Comparison with the available experimental data suggests that the split-valence bases lead to an overestimate, possibly by about 10 kJ/mol, of the inversion barrier in the crystal, whereas the STO-3G and STO-3G* basis sets underestimate this barrier. It appears that the inversion barrier for thianthrene is much lower in solution than in the crystal. The long-range coupling constants between the methylene and ring protons for thioxanthene in solution are consistent with an inversion barrier somewhat smaller than those obtained with the split-valence bases but rather larger than those predicted with the STO-3G basis set. The bond lengths and angles in the equilibrium structures of the two molecules, as computed with the 3-21G(*) basis, agree reasonably well with those in their crystals, except that the theoretical folding angles are smaller than measured. These discrepancies become less marked when expectation values are calculated from the theoretical inversion potentials at finite temperatures. Key words: MO calculations, inversion potentials of thianthrene and thioxanthene; 1H NMR, thioxanthene; spin–spin coupling constants, long range, in thioxanthene.


1989 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 338-341
Author(s):  
L. M. Kapkan ◽  
A. Yu. Chervinskii ◽  
T. M. Pekhtereva ◽  
Yu. I. Smirnov ◽  
A. F. Dmitruk

1986 ◽  
Vol 64 (8) ◽  
pp. 1602-1606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Rudy Sebastian ◽  
Glenn H. Penner ◽  
S. R. Salman

The through-space or proximate nuclear spin–spin coupling constant, 5J(F,CH3) = 5J, between methyl protons and ring fluorine nuclei in alkylfluorobenzenes is postulated as [Formula: see text] θ being the torsional angle for the [Formula: see text] bond. A and B are obtained from the known internal rotational behaviour in 2,6-difluoroethylbenzene and the corresponding cumene derivative. The parameterization is tested on the observed 5J in derivatives of 2,4,6-tri-tert-butyl- and 2,4,6-tri-isopropyl-fluorobenzene, in 2-chloro-6-fluoroisopropylbenzene, 2,6-difluoro-α-methylstyrene, and N-methyl-8-fluoroquinolinium halides. A prediction is made for 5J in 2,6-difluoro-tert-butylbenzene. It appears that the present parameterization allows the derivation of approximate torsional potentials from proximate couplings, for example in α,α-dimethyl-2,6-difluorobenzyl alcohol.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document