MRI assessment of the bone adjacent to giant cell tumours and its association with local recurrence after intralesional curettage

2018 ◽  
Vol 73 (11) ◽  
pp. 984.e19-984.e28
Author(s):  
Y. He ◽  
J. Wang ◽  
L. Du ◽  
F. Yuan ◽  
X. Ding ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (12) ◽  
pp. 1626-1632 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. Medellin ◽  
T. Fujiwara ◽  
R. M. Tillman ◽  
L. M. Jeys ◽  
J. Gregory ◽  
...  

Aims The aim of this paper was to investigate the prognostic factors for local recurrence in patients with pathological fracture through giant cell tumours of bone (GCTB). Patients and Methods A total of 107 patients presenting with fractures through GCTB treated at our institution (Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom) between 1995 and 2016 were retrospectively studied. Of these patients, 57 were female (53%) and 50 were male (47%).The mean age at diagnosis was 33 years (14 to 86). A univariate analysis was performed, followed by multivariate analysis to identify risk factors based on the treatment and clinical characteristics. Results The initial surgical treatment was curettage with or without adjuvants in 55 patients (51%), en bloc resection with or without reconstruction in 45 patients (42%), and neoadjuvant denosumab, followed by resection (n = 3, 3%) or curettage (n = 4, 4%). The choice of treatment depended on tumour location, Campanacci tumour staging, intra-articular involvement, and fracture displacement. Neoadjuvant denosumab was used only in fractures through Campanacci stage 3 tumours. Local recurrence occurred in 28 patients (25%). Surgery more than six weeks after the fracture did not affect the risk of recurrence in any of the groups. In Campanacci stage 3 tumours not treated with denosumab, en bloc resection had lower local recurrences (13%), compared with curettage (39%). In tumours classified as Campanacci 2, intralesional curettage and en bloc resections had similar recurrence rates (21% and 24%, respectively). After univariate analysis, the type of surgical intervention, location, and the use of denosumab were independent factors predicting local recurrence. Further surgery was required 33% more often after intralesional curettage in comparison with resections (mean 1.59, 0 to 5 vs 1.06, 0 to 3 operations). All patients treated with denosumab followed by intralesional curettage developed local recurrence. Conclusion In patients with pathological fractures through GCTB not treated with denosumab, en bloc resection offers lower risks of local recurrence in tumours classified as Campanacci stage 3. Curettage or resections are both similar options in terms of the risk of local recurrence for tumours classified as Campanacci stage 2. The benefits of denosumab followed by intralesional curettage in these patients still remains unclear.


Hand Surgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (02) ◽  
pp. 149-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azal Jalgaonkar ◽  
Baljinder Dhinsa ◽  
Howard Cottam ◽  
Ganapathyraman Mani

Giant cell tumours of tendon sheath of hand present a surgical dilemma due to their high incidence of local recurrence. We present a case series of 46 patients with 47 histologically confirmed giant cell tumours of tendon sheath over a ten-year period from 1998 to 2008. The mean follow-up was 47 months (range 25–124 months). We identified tumours with bony erosions and piecemeal resections as predictors of recurrence. Our recurrence rate of 9% was at the lower end of spectrum of previously published reports (range 7%–44%). We recommend "en-masse" excision of these tumours. All the patients with suspicion of these tumours should have preoperative radiographs to identify erosions. A thorough curettage of the bone should be done in cases with osseous erosion to prevent recurrence. Patients with these risk factors should be followed up annually for five years and be warned about recurrence.


2011 ◽  
Vol 93-B (12) ◽  
pp. 1665-1669 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. L. Gaston ◽  
R. Bhumbra ◽  
M. Watanuki ◽  
A. T. Abudu ◽  
S. R. Carter ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 119 (11) ◽  
pp. 861-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Chen ◽  
Xiao-Yi Ding ◽  
Chengs-Sheng Wang ◽  
Ming-Jue Si ◽  
Lian-Jun Du ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (1) ◽  
pp. 184-191
Author(s):  
David Louis Perrin ◽  
Julia D. Visgauss ◽  
David A. Wilson ◽  
Anthony M. Griffin ◽  
Albiruni R. Abdul Razak ◽  
...  

Aims Local recurrence remains a challenging and common problem following curettage and joint-sparing surgery for giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB). We previously reported a 15% local recurrence rate at a median follow-up of 30 months in 20 patients with high-risk GCTB treated with neoadjuvant Denosumab. The aim of this study was to determine if this initial favourable outcome following the use of Denosumab was maintained with longer follow-up. Methods Patients with GCTB of the limb considered high-risk for unsuccessful joint salvage, due to minimal periarticular and subchondral bone, large soft tissue mass, or pathological fracture, were treated with Denosumab followed by extended intralesional curettage with the goal of preserving the joint surface. Patients were followed for local recurrence, metastasis, and secondary sarcoma. Results A total of 25 patients with a mean age of 33.8 years (18 to 67) with high-risk GCTB received median six cycles of Denosumab before surgery. Tumours occurred most commonly around the knee (17/25, 68%). The median follow-up was 57 months (interquartile range (IQR) 13 to 88). The joint was salvaged in 23 patients (92%). Two required knee arthroplasty due to intra-articular fracture and arthritis. Local recurrence developed in 11 patients (44%) at a mean of 32.5 months (3 to 75) following surgery, of whom four underwent repeat curettage and joint salvage. One patient developed secondary osteosarcoma and another benign GCT lung metastases. Conclusion The use of Denosumab for joint salvage was associated with a higher than expected rate of local recurrence at 44%. Neoadjuvant Denosumab for joint-sparing procedures should be considered with caution in light of these results. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):184–191.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Boriani ◽  
Luca Boriani

2021 ◽  
pp. 100366
Author(s):  
Lenian Zhou ◽  
Shanyi Lin ◽  
Hanqiang Jin ◽  
Zhaoyuan Zhang ◽  
Changqing Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document