Disease variation and chemical control of Ramularia leaf spot in sugar beet

2013 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 68-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tine Thach ◽  
Lisa Munk ◽  
Anne Lisbet Hansen ◽  
Lise N. Jørgensen
2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 473-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliano Cesar da Silva ◽  
Wagner Bettiol ◽  
Nelson Dias Suassuna

Plant Disease ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Stojšin ◽  
J. Balaž ◽  
D. Budakov ◽  
Slaviša Stanković ◽  
I. Nikolić ◽  
...  

A severe bacterial leaf spot was observed during June and July 2013 on commercial cultivars of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera) in the Vojvodina Province of Serbia. Serbia is a major sugar beet production area in southeastern Europe, with 62,895 ha and 3 million tons of sugar beet yield in 2013. A foliar leaf spot observed in 25 commercial sugar beet fields surveyed ranged from 0.1 to 40% severity. Symptoms were characterized as circular or irregular, 5- to 20-mm diameter, white to light brown necrotic spots, each with a dark margin. Diseased leaves were rinsed in sterilized, distilled water (SDW) and dried at room temperature, and leaf sections taken from the margin of necrotic tissue were macerated in SDW. Isolations from 48 symptomatic leaves onto nutrient agar with 5% (w/v) sucrose (NAS) produced bacterial colonies that were whitish, circular, dome-shaped, and Levan-positive. Representative isolates (n = 105) were Gram negative; aerobic; positive for catalase, fluorescence on King's medium B, and tobacco hypersensitivity; and negative for oxidase, potato rot, and arginine dehydrolase. These reactions corresponded to LOPAT group Ia, which includes Pseudomonas syringae pathovars (2). Repetitive extragenic palindromic sequence (rep)-PCR was used for genetic fingerprinting the isolates using the REP, ERIC, and BOX primers. Twenty-five different profiles were obtained among the strains. From each profile group, one representative strain was sequenced for the gyrB gene (1). Four heterogenic groups were observed, and representative gyrB gene sequences of each group were deposited in the NCBI GenBank (Accession Nos. KJ950024 to KJ950027). The sequences were compared with those of pathotype strain P. syringae pv. aptata CFBP 1617 deposited in the PAMDB database; one strain was 100% homologous, and the other three were 99% homologous. To fulfill identification of the Serbian sugar beet isolates, gltA and rpoD partial gene sequences were determined (1), and the sequences were deposited as Accession Nos. KM386838 to KM386841 for gltA and KM386830 to KM38683033 for rpoD. The sequences were 100% homologous with those of pathotype strain CFBP 1617. Pathogenicity of each of four representative bacterial strains was tested on 3-week-old plants of the sugar beet cultivars Marinela, Serenada, and Jasmina (KWS, Belgrade, Serbia) and Lara (NS Seme, Novi Sad, Serbia) by atomizing a bacterial suspension of ~106 CFU/ml of the appropriate isolate onto the abaxial leaf surface of three plants per cultivar until water-soaking of the leaf surface was observed. Three plants of each cultivar atomized similarly with P. syringae pv. aptata CFBP 2473 and SDW served as positive and negative control treatments, respectively. Inoculated plants were kept in a clear plastic box at 80 to 100% RH and 17 ± 1°C and examined for symptom development over 3 weeks. For all test isolates and the control strain, inoculated leaves first developed water-soaked lesions 7 days after inoculation (DAI). By 10 to 14 DAI, lesions were necrotic and infection had spread to the petioles. By 21 DAI, wilting was observed on more than 50% of inoculated plants. Negative control plants were symptomless. Bacteria re-isolated onto NAS from inoculated leaves had the same colony morphology, LOPAT results, and gyrB partial gene sequences as described for the test strains. No bacteria were re-isolated from negative control plants. Based on these tests, the pathogen causing leaf spot on sugar beet in Serbia was identified as P. syringae pv. aptata. References: (1) P. Ferrente and M. Scortichini. Plant Pathol. 59:954, 2010. (2) R. A. Lelliott et al. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 29:470, 1966.


2014 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 1025-1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham R. D. McGrann ◽  
Anna Stavrinides ◽  
Joanne Russell ◽  
Margaret M. Corbitt ◽  
Allan Booth ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 681-706
Author(s):  
Neil Havis ◽  

Ramularia leaf spot is an emerging pathogen across barley growing regions of the world. It's rise from minor to major disease has been rapid over the last twenty years. The causal pathogen, Ramularia collo-cygni is poorly understood but it has been shown to have a complex life cycle and the ability to exist on many hosts in an endophytic state. The rate of development of fungicide resistance in the fungus is also extremely fast and many of the major single site fungicides are no longer effective in many countries. With multisite fungicides having their approval or reconsidered and no consistent varietal resistance available, control of the disease is increasing challenging. This chapter reviews the latest research into Ramularia biology and control and highlights the areas where recent advances have been made.


2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert T. Lartey ◽  
Andrew W. Lenssen ◽  
Robert G. Evans ◽  
Soumitra Ghoshroy

2020 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 101455
Author(s):  
Bahaa E.S. Abd El-Fatah ◽  
Mohamed Hashem ◽  
Kamal A.M. Abo-Elyousr ◽  
Hadeel M.M. Khalil Bagy ◽  
Saad A.M. Alamri

1999 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. -O. Nilsson ◽  
M. Hansen ◽  
A. H. Panagopoulos ◽  
S. Tuvesson ◽  
M. Ehlde ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document