Rapid detection of avian influenza virus in chicken fecal samples by immunomagnetic capture reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction assay

2011 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raghuram Dhumpa ◽  
Kurt Jensen Handberg ◽  
Poul Henrik Jørgensen ◽  
Sun Yi ◽  
Anders Wolff ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 51 (s1) ◽  
pp. 235-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Montserrat Agüero ◽  
Elena San Miguel ◽  
Azucena Sánchez ◽  
Concepción Gómez-Tejedor ◽  
Miguel Angel Jiménez-Clavero

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (02) ◽  
pp. 75-79
Author(s):  
Lih-Chiann Wang ◽  
Wei-En Hsu ◽  
Wei Thong ◽  
Ting-Yen Chao ◽  
Ching-Ho Wang

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used routinely to detect the avian influenza virus (AIV) nucleoprotein (NP) gene. The purpose of the present study was to compare the correctness of a nested RT-PCR (nRT-PCR), one conventional RT-PCR with its outer primer (oRT-PCR) and the other conventional RT-PCR with its inner primer (iRT-PCR) to detect AIV NP gene. A total of 365 AI-free fecal swabs (73 pools), 7 tracheal swabs and anllantoic fluid from 25 chicken embryos were used to determine the analytic specificities of those tests. Compared with the iRT-PCR, the nRT-PCR was more sensitive for AIV detection. However, the specificities of nRT-PCR, oRT-PCR and iRT-PCR were 48.6% (35/72), 100% (67/67) and 91.3% (84/92), respectively. The amplifying band was sequenced and confirmed to be the AIV NP gene as the positive control. The specificity of this nRT-PCR is too low to be used for the AIV screening test.


Animals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1010
Author(s):  
Samah Mosad Mosad ◽  
Fatma A. El-Gohary ◽  
Hanaa Said Ali ◽  
Hanem El-Sharkawy ◽  
Ehab Kotb Elmahallawy

Avian influenza virus (AIV) remains one of the enzootic zoonotic diseases that challenges the poultry industry in Egypt. In the present study, a total of 500 tissue samples were collected from 100 chicken farms (broilers and layers) suspected to be infected with AIV through the period from 2009 to 2019 from Dakahlia governorate, Egypt. These samples were pooled in 100 working samples and screened for AIV then the positive samples were subjected to histopathological examination combined with real time-polymerase chain reaction (RRT-PCR). RRT-PCR positive samples were also subjected to conventional reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of H5 AIV and some of these resulting positive samples were sequenced for detection of the molecular nature of the studied virus. Interestingly, the histopathological examination revealed necrotic liver with leukocytic infiltration with degenerative changes with necrotic pancreatitis, edema, and intense lymphoid depletion of splenic tissue and hyperplastic tracheal epithelium. Likewise, edema and congested sub mucosal blood vessels and intense bronchial necrosis with hyalinized wall vascular wall and heterophils infiltration were reported. Pneumonic areas with intense leukocytic aggregation mainly and vasculitis of the pulmonary blood vessels were also detected in lung. Collectively, these significant pathological changes in examined tissues cohered with AIV infection. Regarding the molecular characterization, 66 samples were positive for AIV by RRT-PCR and 52 of them were positive for H5 AIV by RT-PCR. The phylogenetic analysis revealed that the H5 viruses identified in this study were aligned with other Egyptian H5N1 AIVs in the Egyptian sub clade 2.2.1, while some of the identified strains were aligned with other Egyptian H5N8 strains in the new Egyptian sub clade 2.3.4.4. Taken together, our present findings emphasize the wide spread of AIV in Egypt and the importance of developing an efficient surveillance and periodical screening program for controlling such disease of public health concern.


2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed E. El Zowalaty ◽  
Martha Abin ◽  
Subhatra Raju ◽  
Yogesh Chander ◽  
Patrick T. Redig ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1379.1-1379
Author(s):  
L. Giardullo ◽  
C. Rotondo ◽  
A. Corrado ◽  
N. Maruotti ◽  
R. Colia ◽  
...  

Background:Previous study evidenced a cross-reactivity between Sars-Cov-2 antibodies and autoimmune tissue antigen involved in connective tissue diseases, as nuclear antigen (NA), extractable nuclear antigen (ENA), histone and collagen (1). No study has been published about the titer of Sars-Cov-2 antibodies in non-infected patients with autoimmune disease.Objectives:To evaluate the titer of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in non-COVID-19 patients and compare it between systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients and healthy controls (HC).Methods:A total of 58 patients with SSc (who fulfilled ACR/EULAR 2013 SSc classification criteria) and 18 HC were enrolled. Sera of all participants were collected, and SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgG and IgM) were evaluated by means ELISA. In all participants swabs for SARS-CoV-2 by real-time reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction assay were reported negative. Demographic, clinical, and autoimmune serological characteristics of SSc patients were recorded. The normal distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk’s test. Exclusion criteria was previous or actual Sars-Cov-2 infection. Comparisons between study groups of patients were evaluated by the Student’s t-test or Mann – Whitney U-test as appropriate. The differences between categorial variables were assessed by Pearson chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, as opportune. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.Results:We observed significant differences between SSc patients and HC in serum levels of Sars-Cov-2 antibodies (IgG: 1,4±2,1 AU/ml vs 0,36±0,19 AU/ml respectively (p=0,001); and IgM: 2,5±3,1 AU/ml vs 0,8±0,7 AU/ml (p=0,022)). In 5 SSc patients was found titer of Sars-Cov-2 antibodies (IgG) exceeding the cut-off, but the control of swabs for SARS-CoV-2 by real-time reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction assay were negative. No significative differences in Sars-Cov-2 autoantibodies titer were found in subgroup of SSc patients with or without ILD or PAH, limited or diffuse skin subset, and different autoantibodies profile. Furthermore, antibodies titer was not associated with different drugs (steroid, methotrexate, mofetil-mycophenolate and bosentan) in use.Conclusion:A cross mimicking between Sars-Cov-2 antibodies and antinuclear antibodies or anti ENA could be hypothesized. Further studies are necessary to unravel the reliability of Sars-Cov-2 antibodies detection in autoimmune disease.References:[1]Vojdani, A., Vojdani, E., & Kharrazian, D. (2021). Reaction of human monoclonal antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 proteins with tissue antigens: Implications for autoimmune diseases. Frontiers in Immunology, 11, 3679Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document