scholarly journals Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clones with high-level mupirocin resistance

2016 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
María González-Domínguez ◽  
Cristina Seral ◽  
Carmen Potel ◽  
Yolanda Sáenz ◽  
Maximiliano Álvarez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Phenotypic Characterization ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Mupirocin Resistance ◽  
High Level

Localization and Characterization of MupA Gene in High and Low-Level Mupirocin Resistant Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-177
Author(s):  
Marwa S. Mostaf ◽  
Alaa R. Awad
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Plasmid Dna ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Gene Location ◽  
Chromosomal Dna ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Mupirocin Resistance ◽  
High Level

Background: Two types of mupirocin resistance among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have been reported; low-level mupirocin resistance (LL-MR), and high-level mupirocin resistance (HL-MR). The mupA gene is typically located on mobile genetic elements which facilitate the resistance dissemination. Objective: The aim of this work was to identify the mupA gene location, as well as the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns in high and low-level mupirocin resistant MRSA. Methodology: This study was conducted on 100 MRSA isolates; seven of them were mupirocin resistant. The E test was used to identify high and low level mupirocin resistance. Amplification of mupA gene in total and plasmid DNA was performed. We also detected the spacer region (trsLM–IS257-like–mupA) in the 7 isolates by PCR then we investigated its RFLP patterns. Results: Four MR MRSA isolates had low level resistance, their MupA gene was located on chromosomal DNA, whereas, three isolates showed high level MR, their MupA gene was located on plasmid DNA. Four types of different RFLP patterns of the spacer region were identified; type-1 included two LL-MR isolates, each of type-2 and 3 included both HL-MR and LL-MR isolates, and type-4 included one HL-MR isolate. Conclusions: Staphylococcus aureus mupA gene responsible for LL-MR is located on the chromosome while that responsible for HL-MR is plasmid-mediated. The spacer region variations appear to occur in both chromosomal and plasmid-located mupA gene regardless the type of mupirocin resistance.

scholarly journals Emerging high-level mupirocin resistance among MRSA isolates in Ireland

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Angela Rossney ◽  
S O'Connell
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Blood Stream ◽  
Reference Laboratory ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Mupirocin Resistance ◽  
High Level

High-level mupirocin resistance was detected among 37 of 2,586 (1.4%) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) blood-stream isolates sent to the Ireland's National MRSA Reference Laboratory between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2005, compared with 29 of 997 isolates (2.9%) sent between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2007.

Assessment of Mupirocin Resistance among Clinical Isolates of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-114
Author(s):  
Nancy M. Attia ◽  
Abeer Abd El Rahim Ghazal ◽  
Omnia M. Khaleel ◽  
Ahmed Gaballah
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Disk Diffusion Method ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Mupirocin Resistance ◽  
High Level ◽  
Research Institute Hospital ◽  
Low Prevalence ◽  
Mrsa Colonization

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization is considered a major risk factor for nosocomial infections and its decolonization has reduced these infections. Mupirocin (MUP) is the topical antibiotic of choice for decolonization. MUP decolonization failure is attributed to MUP resistance. Objective: The aim of the current study is to assess MUP resistance among MRSA isolates phenotypically and genotypically. Methodology: Fifty MRSA isolates were identified in Microbiology Department in the Medical Research Institute hospital, Alexandria University. Antibiotic susceptibility to different classes of antibiotics by disk diffusion method was done. MUP minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined phenotypically by MUP Ezy MIC™ Strips. MUP resistance was determined genetically by multiplex PCR detection of mupA and mupB. Results: Of all MRSA isolates, 6% exhibited high level and none showed low level MUP resistance. Only mupA was detected in all resistant isolates. Conclusion: Despite low prevalence of MUP resistance, it is appropriate to test MUP resistance prior nasal decolonization

scholarly journals Chlorhexidine and Mupirocin Susceptibility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in the REDUCE-MRSA Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (11) ◽  
pp. 2735-2742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary K. Hayden ◽  
Karen Lolans ◽  
Katherine Haffenreffer ◽  
Taliser R. Avery ◽  
Ken Kleinman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Cluster Randomized Trial ◽  
Confidence Limits ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Mrsa Infection ◽  
Mupirocin Resistance ◽  
Cluster Randomized ◽  
High Level

Whether targeted or universal decolonization strategies for the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) select for resistance to decolonizing agents is unresolved. The REDUCE-MRSA trial (ClinicalTrials registration no. NCT00980980) provided an opportunity to investigate this question. REDUCE-MRSA was a 3-arm, cluster-randomized trial of either screening and isolation without decolonization, targeted decolonization with chlorhexidine and mupirocin, or universal decolonization without screening to prevent MRSA infection in intensive-care unit (ICU) patients. Isolates from the baseline and intervention periods were collected and tested for susceptibility to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) by microtiter dilution; mupirocin susceptibility was tested by Etest. The presence of the qacA or qacB gene was determined by PCR and DNA sequence analysis. A total of 3,173 isolates were analyzed; 2 were nonsusceptible to CHG (MICs, 8 μg/ml), and 5/814 (0.6%) carried qacA or qacB . At baseline, 7.1% of MRSA isolates expressed low-level mupirocin resistance, and 7.5% expressed high-level mupirocin resistance. In a mixed-effects generalized logistic regression model, the odds of mupirocin resistance among clinical MRSA isolates or MRSA isolates acquired in an ICU in intervention versus baseline periods did not differ across arms, although estimates were imprecise due to small numbers. Reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine and carriage of qacA or qacB were rare among MRSA isolates in the REDUCE-MRSA trial. The odds of mupirocin resistance were no different in the intervention versus baseline periods across arms, but the confidence limits were broad, and the results should be interpreted with caution.

The prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates with high-level mupirocin resistance from patients and personnel in a burn center

Burns ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 650-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Effat Abbasi-Montazeri ◽  
Azar Dokht Khosravi ◽  
Mohammad Mehdi Feizabadi ◽  
Hamed Goodarzi ◽  
Seyed Sajjad Khoramrooz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Mupirocin Resistance ◽  
High Level
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document