How fuzzy-trace theory predicts development of risky decision making, with novel extensions to culture and reward sensitivity

2021 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 100986
Author(s):  
Sarah M. Edelson ◽  
Valerie F. Reyna
2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie F. Reyna ◽  
Evan A. Wilhelms ◽  
Michael J. McCormick ◽  
Rebecca B. Weldon

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Cavanagh ◽  
David Neville ◽  
Michael X Cohen ◽  
Irene Van de Vijver ◽  
Helga Harsay ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 275-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie F Reyna ◽  
Susan C Ellis

Traditional theories of cognitive development predict that children progress from intuitive to computational thinking, whereas fuzzy-trace theory makes the opposite prediction To evaluate these alternatives, framing problems were administered to preschoolers, second graders, and fifth graders Consistent with fuzzy-trace theory, results indicated (a) that younger children focused on quantitative differences between outcomes and did not exhibit framing effects (risk avoidance for gains, risk seeking for losses) and (b) that older children assimilated these quantitative differences and displayed framing effects


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie F. Reyna ◽  
David A. Broniatowski

Abstract Gilead et al. offer a thoughtful and much-needed treatment of abstraction. However, it fails to build on an extensive literature on abstraction, representational diversity, neurocognition, and psychopathology that provides important constraints and alternative evidence-based conceptions. We draw on conceptions in software engineering, socio-technical systems engineering, and a neurocognitive theory with abstract representations of gist at its core, fuzzy-trace theory.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared Hotaling ◽  
Jerry Busemeyer ◽  
Richard Shiffrin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document