scholarly journals Reducing attrition in drug development: smart loading preclinical safety assessment

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth A. Roberts ◽  
Stefan L. Kavanagh ◽  
Howard R. Mellor ◽  
Christopher E. Pollard ◽  
Sally Robinson ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 153537022110021
Author(s):  
John-Michael Sauer ◽  
Amy C Porter

Safety biomarkers are important drug development tools, both preclinically and clinically. It is a straightforward process to correlate the performance of nonclinical safety biomarkers with histopathology, and ideally, the biomarker is useful in all species commonly used in safety assessment. In clinical validation studies, where histopathology is not feasible, safety biomarkers are compared to the response of standard biomarkers and/or to clinical adjudication. Worldwide, regulatory agencies have put in place processes to qualify biomarkers to provide confidence in the manner of use and interpretation of biomarker data in drug development studies. This paper describes currently qualified safety biomarkers which can be utilized to monitor for nephrotoxicity and cardiotoxicity and ongoing projects to qualify safety biomarkers for liver, skeletal muscle, and vascular injury. In many cases, the development and use of these critical drug development tools is dependent upon partnerships and the precompetitive sharing of data to support qualification efforts.


Author(s):  
Barbara A. Hendrickson ◽  
William Wang ◽  
Greg Ball ◽  
Dimitri Bennett ◽  
Amit Bhattacharyya ◽  
...  

Vaccine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Yang ◽  
Baofeng Liu ◽  
Lei Yue ◽  
Tianhong Xie ◽  
Hua Li ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 295 ◽  
pp. S236
Author(s):  
C. Turek ◽  
P. Molnar-Pfitzner ◽  
N. Mörbt ◽  
M.B. Müller ◽  
P. Vögele ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean P. Troth ◽  
Frank Simutis ◽  
Gary S. Friedman ◽  
Susan Todd ◽  
Frank D. Sistare

2014 ◽  
Vol 229 ◽  
pp. S167
Author(s):  
Stefan Kavanagh ◽  
Howard Mellor ◽  
Christopher Pollard ◽  
Sally Robinson ◽  
Stefan Platz ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 376-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Ettrup ◽  
Søren Holm ◽  
Martin Hansen ◽  
Muhammad Wasim ◽  
Martin Andreas Santini ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 327-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Price ◽  
T. Scott Manetz ◽  
Jeffry D. Shearer ◽  
Robert V. House

A recombinant vaccine (rF1V) is being developed to protect adults 18 to 55 years of age from fatal pneumonic plague caused by aerosolized Yersinia pestis. A comprehensive series of studies was conducted to evaluate the general toxicity and local reactogenicity of the rF1V vaccine prior to first use in humans. Toxicity was evaluated in CD-1 mice vaccinated with control material and three dosage concentrations of rF1V with or without Alhydrogel® by intramuscular (IM) injection on Study Days 1, 29, 57 and 71 in a volume of 0.1 mL. Total immunizing protein given in each dose was 0, 20 or 60 μg/animal. Local reactogenicity was evaluated in mice at the dosages given and in New Zealand white (NZW) rabbits using the same injection volume and formulations (40, 80, 160 and 320 μg/mL total antigen and 0.3% (w/v) Alhydrogel®) intended for human use (0.5 mL). The rF1V vaccine produced no apparent systemic toxicity and only transient edema and erythema at the injection site. Together these results indicated a favorable safety profile for rF1V and supported its use in a Phase 1 clinical trial.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document