Barriers to accessing opioid substitution treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: A systematic review from the client perspective

2021 ◽  
pp. 108651
Author(s):  
Natasha Yvonne Hall ◽  
Long Le ◽  
Ishani Majmudar ◽  
Cathrine Mihalopoulos
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehsan Moazen-Zadeh ◽  
Kimia Ziafat ◽  
Kiana Yazdani ◽  
Mostafa Mamdouh ◽  
James Wong ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveThere is a dearth of high-quality systematic evidence on the impact of opioid substitution medications on mental health. We compared mental health outcomes between opioid medications and placebo/waitlist, and between different opioids.MethodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was pre-registered at PROSPERO (CRD42018109375). Embase, MEDLINE, PsychInfo, CINAHL Complete, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from inception to May 2020. RCTs were included if they compared opioid agonists with each other or with a placebo/waitlist in substitution treatment of patients with opioid use disorder, and reported at least one mental health outcome on a span of more than 1-month post baseline. Studies with psychiatric care, adjunct psychotropic medications, or unbalanced psychosocial services were excluded. Primary outcomes were comparison of depressive symptoms and overall mental health between opioids and placebo/waitlist. Random effects model was used for all the meta-analysis.ResultsNineteen studies were included in the narrative synthesis and 15 in the quantitative synthesis. Hydromorphone, diacetylmorphine (DAM), methadone, slow-release oral morphine, buprenorphine, and placebo/waitlist were among the included interventions. Based on network meta-analysis for primary outcomes, buprenorphine (SMD (CI95%)= −0.61 (−1.20, −0.11)), DAM (−1.40 (−2.70, −0.23)), and methadone (−1.20 (−2.30, −0.11)) were superior to waitlist/placebo on overall mental health. Further direct pairwise meta-analysis indicated that overall mental health improved more in DAM compared to methadone (−0.23 (−0.34, −0.13)).ConclusionsIt appears that opioid medications improve mental health independent of psychosocial services. Potential contribution of other factors needs to be further investigated.


2014 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. e162
Author(s):  
Suzanne Nielsen ◽  
B. Larance ◽  
Nicholas Lintzeris ◽  
Emma Black ◽  
Raimondo Bruno ◽  
...  

BMJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. j1550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Sordo ◽  
Gregorio Barrio ◽  
Maria J Bravo ◽  
B Iciar Indave ◽  
Louisa Degenhardt ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. e0232086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aisling Máire O’Connor ◽  
Gráinne Cousins ◽  
Louise Durand ◽  
Joe Barry ◽  
Fiona Boland

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Carlisle ◽  
Olivia Maynard ◽  
Prianka Padmanathan ◽  
Matthew Hickman ◽  
Kyla Hayley Thomas ◽  
...  

Background and Aims Recovery outcomes for opioid substitution treatment are poorer than those for alcohol and other drugs. In order to understand why this is and to synthesise the findings of a large number of qualitative studies, we conducted a systematic review and thematic synthesis to understand facilitators of and barriers to recovery from opioid dependency. Methods Electronic databases (Pubmed, PsychInfo, CINAHL and Embase) were searched. English language studies exploring the views of adult service user and stakeholders with experiences of opioid substitution treatment were considered for inclusion. Included studies were inductively analysed using thematic synthesis. During analysis, the socioecological model was selected as an analytical framework for organising and making links between themes as it captured the complexity of the topic well. ResultsFrom 3646 screened papers, we included 37 studies reporting the views of 1212 staff and service users. Studies highlighted complex interactions between factors influencing recovery across the five levels of the socioecological model (intrapersonal, inter-personal, organisational, community and policy). Early life experiences of trauma were common; lack of support (both psychological and social) was also a recurring theme resulting in feelings of disconnection and isolation. Stigma played a particularly important role in an individual’s capacity to recover from opioid dependency and cut-across all levels of the socioecological model. Conclusions Interventions targeted at the individual level fail to take account of the complexity of recovery within opioid substitution treatment and may ignore the complex socio-political context that service users and services exist within. Stigma permeates all levels of the opioid substitution treatment system; we suggest that addressing this is likely to improve healthcare encounters, help-seeking, increase access to social support and facilitate community reintegration for individuals receiving opioid substitution treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document