Arthroscopic “Double-Inlay” Eden-Hybinette Procedure with Modified Suture Button Fixation for the Revision of Failed Bristow-Latarjet

Background Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthroplasty is a common procedure in the surgical management of symptomatic thumb basal joint arthritis. Following trapeziectomy, a number of suspensionplasty techniques are often used, but limited comparative evidence exists between these techniques. The central aim of this study was to prospectively compare the outcomes of 2 suspensionplasty techniques following trapeziectomy: suture button (TightRope) versus ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI). Methods Prospective data were collected on 112 consecutive patients with Eaton stage III-IV thumb CMC arthritis who underwent open trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty. There were 53 LRTI and 59 TightRope suspensionplasty procedures. Outcomes were measured using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand ( QuickDASH) questionnaire, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, radiographic analysis, and lateral pinch strength. Patient demographic data and complications were also recorded. Results Patients undergoing TightRope suspensionplasty had significantly higher trapeziometacarpal index and thus less subsidence than the LRTI group at 2 weeks (0.22 vs 0.17 [ P < .0001]) and 3 months (0.17 vs 0.15 [ P < .05]) postoperatively. TightRope suspensionplasty also had a significantly lower QuickDASH score at 2 weeks (64.7 vs 74.6 [ P < .05]), 3 months (20.7 vs 32.5 [ P < .05]), and 1 year postoperatively (7.57 vs 21.5 [ P < .05]) compared with the LRTI group. However, there was no difference in VAS pain, lateral pinch strength, reoperation, or complications at any time point between groups. Conclusions Thumb CMC joint arthroplasty performed with a TightRope suspensionplasty versus LRTI yielded short-term improved resistance to subsidence, long-term greater improvement in clinical outcome by QuickDASH, and no difference in pain or complication rates.

Download Full-text

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Following Latarjet Using Suture Button Fixation

JSES International ◽

10.1016/j.jseint.2020.10.009 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Brandon J. Erickson ◽

Yousef Shishani ◽

Stacy Jones ◽

Anthony A. Romeo ◽

Reuben Gobezie

Keyword(s):

Suture Button ◽

Radiographic Outcomes

Download Full-text

Confirming Proper Button Deployment of Suspensory Fixation During ACL Reconstruction

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967120974349 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

pp. 232596712097434

Author(s):

Daniel F. O’Brien ◽

Lilah Fones ◽

Victoria Stoj ◽

Cory Edgar ◽

Katherine Coyner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Soft Tissue ◽

Acl Reconstruction ◽

Sports Medicine ◽

Cruciate Ligament ◽

Case Series ◽

Graft Fixation ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Lateral Cortex ◽

Suture Button ◽

Suspensory Fixation

Background: Suspensory fixation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) grafts has emerged as a popular device for femoral graft fixation. However, improper deployment of the suspensory fixation can compromise proper graft tensioning, leading to failure and revision. Also, soft tissue interposition between the button and bone has been associated with graft migration and pain, occasionally requiring revision surgery. Many surgeons rely on manual testing and application of distal tension to the graft to confirm proper button deployment on the lateral cortex of the femur for ACL graft fixation. Purpose: To determine the reliability of the manual resistance maneuver when applying distal tension to deploy the suspensory device along the lateral cortex of the femur. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All patients undergoing ACLR with a suture button suspensory device for femoral fixation were eligible for enrollment in the study. The surgeries were performed by 3 board-certified, sports medicine fellowship–trained orthopaedic surgeons at a single outpatient surgical center between May 2018 and June 2019. All grafts were passed in a retrograde manner into the femoral tunnel, and a vigorous manual tensioning maneuver in a distal direction was placed on the graft to deploy and secure along the lateral cortex of the femur. Intraoperative mini c-arm fluoroscopy was obtained to demonstrate proper suture button positioning. If interposing tissue or an improperly flipped button was identified, rectifying steps were undertaken and recorded. Results: A total of 51 patients with a mean age of 33.3 years were included in the study. Of these patients, 74.5% had normal suture button positioning identified via intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging, while 15.7% had interposed soft tissue and 9.8% had an improperly flipped button. In all cases, the surgeon was able to rectify the malpositioning intraoperatively. Conclusion: Despite the manual sensation of proper suspensory button positioning, intraoperative fluoroscopy identified suture button deployment errors in ACLR 25% of the time. Correcting the malpositioning is not technically demanding. These findings advocate for routine intraoperative surveillance to confirm appropriate suture button seating during ACLR.

Download Full-text

Management of Ankle Fractures with Syndesmotic Disruption: A Survey of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics ◽

10.1177/2473011420s00408 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 5 (4) ◽

pp. 2473011420S0040

Author(s):

Ryan G. Rogero ◽

Emmanuel M. Illical ◽

Daniel Corr ◽

Steven M. Raikin ◽

James Krieg ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gold Standard ◽

Ankle Fracture ◽

Management Strategies ◽

Ankle Fractures ◽

Multinomial Regression ◽

Orthopaedic Surgeons ◽

Suture Button ◽

Standard Management ◽

Management Protocol ◽

Usage Patterns

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: With an increasing frequency of syndesmotic fixation during ankle fracture ORIF and no current gold standard management protocol, it is important for surgeons to understand the frequency and usage patterns of the various techniques among other orthopaedic surgeons. The purposes of this study are to determine how orthopaedic surgeons currently manage ankle fractures with concomitant syndesmotic disruption and to identify surgeon demographics predictive of syndesmotic management. Methods: An 18-question survey, including 10 specific syndesmotic management questions was sent to the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) and Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA), as well as sent to email addresses of foot and ankle-fellowship trained surgeons. Surgeon demographic questions included years, country, and type of practice, fellowship(s) completed, setting of ankle fracture surgery, and number of ankle fractures operated on per year. Multinomial regression analysis was performed to determine if surgeon demographics were predictive of syndesmotic management. Results: One-hundred ten orthopaedic surgeons completed our survey. Selected predictors of syndesmotic management included: private practice with academic appointments (0.077 [0.007, 0.834]; p=0.035) being predictive of not using screws through an ORIF plate; foot & ankle fellowship (9.981 [1.787, 55.764]; p=0.009) and trauma fellowship (6.644 [1.302, 33.916]; p=0.023) predictive of utilizing screws through a plate; no fellowship (14.886 [1.226, 180.695]; p=0.034) predictive of only using 1 screw; and surgeons practicing in the U.S. were more likely to not use screws across just 3 cortices (0.031 [0.810, 3.660]; p=0.009). Additionally, among those utilizing suture-button devices, foot & ankle fellowship-trained surgeons were more likely to implement suture-button through plate (7.676 [1.286, 45.806]; p=0.025). Conclusion: Several surgeon factors influence decision making in the management of ankle fractures with syndesmotic disruption. This study raises awareness of differences in management strategies that should be used for further discussion when determining a potential gold standard for management of these complex injuries.

Download Full-text