The effects of climate policy on the rate and direction of innovation: A survey of the EU ETS and the electricity sector

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 23-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias S. Schmidt ◽  
Malte Schneider ◽  
Karoline S. Rogge ◽  
Martin J.A. Schuetz ◽  
Volker H. Hoffmann
2008 ◽  
Vol 134 (2) ◽  
pp. 40-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Delarue ◽  
Kris Voorspools ◽  
William D’haeseleer

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 781-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel J. Dorsch ◽  
Christian Flachsland ◽  
Ulrike Kornek

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Andrei Zimakov

The EU ETS is one of the most important EC instruments to curb CO2 emissions. Various climate action organisations use verified emissions data from EU ETS to calculate top EU polluters lists. These shortlists are actively used in their advocacy strategies as an evidence of national or EU-wide climate policies (under)performance to influence policymaking. However, there is no official EU ETS top ten list released by the EC what weakens the political power of this tool. Addressing possible reasons for EC’s reluctance the paper investigates the correlation between the presence of national enterprises in the EU ETS top ten list and the national climate policy actions over 2008-2019 timeframe. Despite different limitations, the EU ETS top ten is adequately reflecting main developments in national efforts to curb GHG emissions and is pointing out underperforming countries and industries covered by the EU ETS. In the variety of hard and soft EU climate policy instruments, the EU ETS top ten polluters list could feature as an information tool. It is especially important for climate action organizations, providing them with an officially released rating as a common reference point that they could use in their evaluations and political campaigns.


2012 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 117-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Kautto ◽  
A. Arasto ◽  
J. Sijm ◽  
P. Peck

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 101-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Birger Skjærseth ◽  
Jørgen Wettestad

This article explains why the significant changes in the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) for the 2013–2020 phase were adopted in 2008. The combination of a more stringent EU-wide cap, allocation of emission allowances for payment, and limits on imports of credits from third countries have strengthened the system for the post-2012 period. This will promote reduction in greenhouse gases compared to the old system. The main reasons for these changes are, first, changes in the positions of the member states due to unsatisfactory experience with performance of the EU ETS so far. Second, a “package approach” where the EU ETS reform was integrated into wider energy and climate policy facilitated agreement on the changes. Third, changes in the position of nonstate actors and a desire to affect the international climate negotiations contributed to the reform.


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 702-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo Dirix ◽  
Wouter Peeters ◽  
Sigrid Sterckx
Keyword(s):  
Eu Ets ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document