The EU ETS in the European Climate Policy Mix: Past, Present and Future

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harro van Asselt
2013 ◽  
Vol 04 (supp01) ◽  
pp. 1340002 ◽  
Author(s):  
ENRICA DE CIAN ◽  
ILKKA KEPPO ◽  
JOHANNES BOLLEN ◽  
SAMUEL CARRARA ◽  
HANNAH FÖRSTER ◽  
...  

This paper examines how changes in an international climate regime would affect the European decarbonization strategy and costs through the mechanisms of trade, technology, and innovation. We present the results from the Energy Modeling Forum (EMF) model comparison study on European climate policy to 2050. Moving from a no-policy scenario to an existing-policies case reduces all energy imports, on average. Introducing a more stringent climate policy target for the EU only leads to slightly greater global emission reductions. Consumers and producers in Europe bear most of the additional burden and inevitably face some economic losses. More ambitious mitigation action outside Europe, especially when paired with a well-operating global carbon market, could reduce the burden for Europe significantly. Because of global learning, the costs of wind and especially solar-PV in Europe would decline below the levels observed in the existing-policy case and increased R&D spending outside the EU would leverage EU R&D investments as well.


2020 ◽  
Vol 251 ◽  
pp. R13-R24
Author(s):  
Milan Elkerbout

Carbon pricing has been the most prominent climate change mitigation policy for the EU since the launch of its emissions trading system (ETS) in 2005. Since then, the context of international climate policy as well as of the socio-political and economical context of decarbonisation has changed considerably. The 2015 Paris Agreement engages virtually every country unlike its predecessor, while non-carbon pricing policies have led to rapid cost reductions in renewables, even if other sectors (particularly in energy-intensive industry) have not seen similar developments. This paper examines how the role of carbon pricing in the EU climate policy mix has evolved from its beginnings as a means to help achieve modest targets under the Kyoto Protocol, to a policy instrument increasingly augmented by a wider policy mix aimed at reaching no net emissions of greenhouse gases by mid-century.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 781-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel J. Dorsch ◽  
Christian Flachsland ◽  
Ulrike Kornek

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 23-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias S. Schmidt ◽  
Malte Schneider ◽  
Karoline S. Rogge ◽  
Martin J.A. Schuetz ◽  
Volker H. Hoffmann

Author(s):  
Hannah Klinkenborg ◽  
Doris Fuchs

AbstractRecent research has considered the contribution of faith-based actors (FBAs) and religious norms to global sustainability and climate governance. However, as yet, it has paid little attention to the relationship between religion and climate politics in the EU. The EU is supposedly a secular body. Nevertheless, FBAs participate in its climate policy discourse, and, therefore, their normative contributions are of interest. In this article, therefore, we explore the role of FBAs in the EU climate discourse with respect to two specific questions: what, if any, specific normative arguments and claims do the FBAs contribute to the EU’s climate policy discourse; and, can or do the relevant normative arguments and claims serve as a basis for collaboration or are they a source of normative conflict between different FBAs or between FBAs and non-FBAs? To answer these questions, we draw on the EU’s transparency register and a content analysis of a specific dialogue between FBAs and the EU’s institutions. On this basis, we identified a range of active FBAs within EU climate politics and demonstrated that they contribute to the European climate discourse by adding deep-rooted values. One way this is achieved is through the connection of climate values to “creation” and the divine command to mankind which can give specific meaning to one’s understanding of nature and fellow humans, as well as one’s sense of responsibility towards both. Furthermore, we find a basis for both agreement and conflict in references to religious norms and ideas. Many actors from different faiths and secular backgrounds emphasize the compatibility of faith-based and other norms. However, other actors highlight differences in perspectives and challenges to climate governance that arise from “conservative” religious norms.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Andrei Zimakov

The EU ETS is one of the most important EC instruments to curb CO2 emissions. Various climate action organisations use verified emissions data from EU ETS to calculate top EU polluters lists. These shortlists are actively used in their advocacy strategies as an evidence of national or EU-wide climate policies (under)performance to influence policymaking. However, there is no official EU ETS top ten list released by the EC what weakens the political power of this tool. Addressing possible reasons for EC’s reluctance the paper investigates the correlation between the presence of national enterprises in the EU ETS top ten list and the national climate policy actions over 2008-2019 timeframe. Despite different limitations, the EU ETS top ten is adequately reflecting main developments in national efforts to curb GHG emissions and is pointing out underperforming countries and industries covered by the EU ETS. In the variety of hard and soft EU climate policy instruments, the EU ETS top ten polluters list could feature as an information tool. It is especially important for climate action organizations, providing them with an officially released rating as a common reference point that they could use in their evaluations and political campaigns.


2012 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 117-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Kautto ◽  
A. Arasto ◽  
J. Sijm ◽  
P. Peck

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Till Requate

AbstractThis article discusses German and European climate policy, inquiring mainly whether the ambitious goals the EU has set itself can be achieved via the instruments presently employed for the purpose and whether these instruments are efficient. In particular we discuss shortcomings of the European emission trading system, we further level criticism at energy policy measures, notably subsidization for renewable energy sources and the overlap with emissions trading. Further we argue that while 20% reduction of CO


2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 101-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Birger Skjærseth ◽  
Jørgen Wettestad

This article explains why the significant changes in the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) for the 2013–2020 phase were adopted in 2008. The combination of a more stringent EU-wide cap, allocation of emission allowances for payment, and limits on imports of credits from third countries have strengthened the system for the post-2012 period. This will promote reduction in greenhouse gases compared to the old system. The main reasons for these changes are, first, changes in the positions of the member states due to unsatisfactory experience with performance of the EU ETS so far. Second, a “package approach” where the EU ETS reform was integrated into wider energy and climate policy facilitated agreement on the changes. Third, changes in the position of nonstate actors and a desire to affect the international climate negotiations contributed to the reform.


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 702-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo Dirix ◽  
Wouter Peeters ◽  
Sigrid Sterckx
Keyword(s):  
Eu Ets ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document