Design space approach in the optimization of the spray-drying process

2012 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 226-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Lebrun ◽  
Fabrice Krier ◽  
Jérôme Mantanus ◽  
Holger Grohganz ◽  
Mingshi Yang ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wasim Akram ◽  
Navneet Garud

Abstract Background Chicory is one of the major source of inulin. In our study, Box–Behnken model/response surface analysis (RSM) was used for the optimization of spray drying process variables to get the maximum inulin yield from chicory (Cichorium intybus L.). For this investigation, the investigational plan utilized three process variables drying temperature (115–125 °C), creep speed (20–24 rpm), and pressure (0.02–0.04 MPa). Result The optimal variables established by applying the Box–Behnken model were as follows: drying temperature 119.20 °C, creep speed 21.64 rpm, and pressure 0.03 MPa. The obtained powdered inulin by spray drying was investigated for the yield value, identification, size, and surface morphology of the particle. The inulin obtained from the spray drying process consists of a fine molecule-sized white powder. Instead, the drying methods shows a significant effect on the morphology and internal configuration of the powdered inulin, as the inulin obtained from spray drying was of a widespread and uniform size and shape, with a rough surface on increase in temperature and smoother surface while increasing the creep speed. The findings indicate that the spray drying with optimum parameters resulted in maximum product yield. Conclusion The outcomes of the study concluded that the product yield through spray drying technique under optimized condition is optimal as compared to other drying technique. Hence, this technique may be applied at commercial scale for the production of inulin.


2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaud Baldinger ◽  
Lucas Clerdent ◽  
Jukka Rantanen ◽  
Mingshi Yang ◽  
Holger Grohganz

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Rebello Lourenço ◽  
Fabiane Lacerda Francisco ◽  
Márcia Regina Spuri Ferreira ◽  
Terezinha De Jesus Andreoli ◽  
Raimar Löbenberg ◽  
...  

The use of preservatives must be optimized in order to ensure the efficacy of an antimicrobial system as well as the product safety. Despite the wide variety of preservatives, the synergistic or antagonistic effects of their combinations are not well established and it is still an issue in the development of pharmaceutical and cosmetic products. The purpose of this paper was to establish a space design using a simplex-centroid approach to achieve the lowest effective concentration of 3 preservatives (methylparaben, propylparaben, and imidazolidinyl urea) and EDTA for an emulsion cosmetic product. Twenty-two formulae of emulsion differing only by imidazolidinyl urea (A: 0.00 to 0.30% w/w), methylparaben (B: 0.00 to 0.20% w/w), propylparaben (C: 0.00 to 0.10% w/w) and EDTA (D: 0.00 to 0.10% w/w) concentrations were prepared. They were tested alone and in binary, ternary and quaternary combinations. Aliquots of these formulae were inoculated with several microorganisms. An electrochemical method was used to determine microbial burden immediately after inoculation and after 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 168 h. An optimization strategy was used to obtain the concentrations of preservatives and EDTA resulting in a most effective preservative system of all microorganisms simultaneously. The use of preservatives and EDTA in combination has the advantage of exhibiting a potential synergistic effect against a wider spectrum of microorganisms. Based on graphic and optimization strategies, we proposed a new formula containing a quaternary combination (A: 55%; B: 30%; C: 5% and D: 10% w/w), which complies with the specification of a conventional challenge test. A design space approach was successfully employed in the optimization of concentrations of preservatives and EDTA in an emulsion cosmetic product. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see “For Readers”) may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue’s contents page.


2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 535-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artur Lewandowski ◽  
Maciej Jaskulski ◽  
Ireneusz Zbiciński

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 584-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdieh Farhangi ◽  
Arash Mahboubi ◽  
Farzad Kobarfard ◽  
Alireza Vatanara ◽  
Seyed Alireza Mortazavi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document