Comparison of F-18-FDG PET/CT findings between pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumor and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

2014 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 231-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-il Kim ◽  
Seok-ki Kim ◽  
Jin Chul Paeng ◽  
Ho-Young Lee
Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1042
Author(s):  
Annachiara Arnone ◽  
Riccardo Laudicella ◽  
Federico Caobelli ◽  
Priscilla Guglielmo ◽  
Marianna Spallino ◽  
...  

In this review, the performance of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in the diagnostic workup of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is evaluated. A comprehensive literature search up to September 2020 was performed, selecting studies with the presence of: sample size ≥10 patients and index test (i.e., “FDG” or “18F-FDG” AND “pancreatic adenocarcinoma” or “pancreas cancer” AND “PET” or “positron emission tomography”). The methodological quality was evaluated using the revised quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) tool and presented according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Basic data (authors, year of publication, country and study design), patients’ characteristics (number of enrolled subjects and age), disease phase, type of treatment and grading were retrieved. Forty-six articles met the adopted research criteria. The articles were divided according to the considered clinical context. Namely, besides conventional anatomical imaging, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), molecular imaging with FDG PET/CT is an important tool in PDAC, for all disease stages. Further prospective studies will be necessary to confirm the cost-effectiveness of such imaging techniques by testing its real potential improvement in the clinical management of PDAC.


2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 415-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randy Yeh ◽  
Laurent Dercle ◽  
Ishan Garg ◽  
Zhen Jane Wang ◽  
David M. Hough ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Jordan ◽  
Duncan Muir ◽  
Stijn van Laarhoven ◽  
Stephen Falk ◽  
Andrew Strickland ◽  
...  

Abstract Background  The NICE Quality Standard for Pancreatic Cancer (December 2018) recommends that ‘adults with localised pancreatic cancer on CT(should) have staging using fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT(FDG-PET/CT) before they have surgery, radiotherapy or systemic therapy’. Such FDG-PET/CT staging aims to provide additional information to conventional cross-sectional imaging, thus presenting the most accurate staging of disease. However, the sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET/CT to deliver relevant additional clinical information must be balanced with potential delays to treatment, and additional cost associated with its use, in the management of a time-critical pathology. Methods Consecutive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC) patients deemed resectable on conventional imaging, and therefore referred for FDG-PET/CT assessment, were included for analysis. Data were derived from a single tertiary Hepatopancreaticobiliary(HPB) centre between May 2018 and June 2021. Data were collected and analysed from a combination of prospectively-collated electronic databases and paper patient records. Results Of 89 patients analysed, 55(61.7%) patients were male. Primary pancreatic lesions were PET avid in 81 cases(91%). Median time from request to FDG-PET/CT performance was 11 days(Range 1-35). Additional clinical information from FDG-PET/CT was provided in 61(68.5%) patients. Further investigations to assess FDG-PET/CT findings were arranged in 23 patients(25.8%; including liver MRI and EUS), demonstrating that FDG-PET/CT findings were true-positive in 6(26.1%), false-positive in 15(65.2%) and equivocal in 2(8.7%). There was a median delay of 60.5 days(Range 26 to 256) from FDG-PET/CT to surgery in those undergoing additional investigation. In total, a new diagnosis of metastatic/non-resectable disease was made in 14(15.7%) patients, preventing progression to planned operative intervention. Conclusions FDG-PET/CT provided additional information to conventional imaging that led to cancellation of planned operative resection in 14(15.7%) PDAC patients-8 directly and 6 following further investigation. However, there was a median delay of 11 days to FDG-PET/CT and 60.5 days from FDG-PET/CT to surgery in those undergoing additional investigation.   Whilst FDG-PET/CT can lead to avoidance of unnecessary surgical intervention in PDAC patients with unsuspected metastatic/non-resectable disease, it can lead to delay, over-investigation, excess cost and anxiety in resectable patients. HPB units should audit their own findings to assess whether the use of FDG-PET/CT should be considered on a standard or selected basis.


Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Kaisa Ahopelto ◽  
Kapo Saukkonen ◽  
Jaana Hagström ◽  
Saila Kauhanen ◽  
Hanna Seppänen ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Glucose metabolism in cancer cells differs from noncancerous cells. The expression of transketolase-like protein 1 (TKTL1), a key enzyme in the glucose metabolism of cancer cells, predicts poor prognosis in several cancer types. We studied TKTL1 as a prognostic tool and whether TKTL1 expression correlates with 18F-FDG-PET-CT among patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This retrospective study examined two PDAC patient cohorts: 168 patients operated on at Helsinki University Hospital between 2001 and 2011, and 20 patients with FDG-PET-CT results available from the Auria Biobank. We used immunohistochemistry for TKTL1 expression, combining results with clinicopathological data. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Five-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was slightly but not significantly better in patients with a high versus low TKTL1 expression, with DSS of 28.0 versus 17.3%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.123). TKTL1 served as a marker of a better prognosis in patients over 65 years old (<i>p</i> = 0.012) and among those with TNM class M1 (<i>p</i> = 0.018), stage IV disease (<i>p</i> = 0.027), or perivascular invasion (<i>p</i> = 0.008). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our study shows that TKTL1 cannot be used as a prognostic factor in PDAC with the exception of elderly patients and those with advanced disease. The correlation of TKTL1 with 18F-FDG-PET-CT requires further study in a larger patient cohort.


2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. e118-e124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aisheng Dong ◽  
Yang Wang ◽  
Hui Dong ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Chao Cheng ◽  
...  

Pancreatology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. S48
Author(s):  
Kwang Hyun Chung ◽  
Sang Hyub Lee ◽  
Joo Kyung Park ◽  
Jin-Hyeok Hwang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document