Selection of patients with rectal cancer for neoadjuvant therapy using pre-therapeutic MRI - Results from OCUM trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 110113
Author(s):  
Sigmar Stelzner ◽  
Reinhard Ruppert ◽  
Rainer Kube ◽  
Joachim Strassburg ◽  
Andreas Lewin ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wim P. Ceelen

The dramatic improvement in local control of rectal cancer observed during the last decades is to be attributed to attention to surgical technique and to the introduction of neoadjuvant therapy regimens. Nevertheless, systemic relapse remains frequent and is currently insufficiently addressed. Intensification of neoadjuvant therapy by incorporating chemotherapy with or without targeted agents before the start of (chemo)radiation or during the waiting period to surgery may present an opportunity to improve overall survival. An increasing number of patients can nowadays undergo sphincter preserving surgery. In selected patients, local excision or even a “wait and see” approach may be feasible following active neoadjuvant therapy. Molecular and genetic biomarkers as well as innovative imaging techniques may in the future allow better selection of patients for this treatment option. Controversy persists concerning the selection of patients for adjuvant chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy after neoadjuvant regimens. The currently available evidence suggests that in complete pathological responders long-term outcome is excellent and adjuvant therapy may be omitted. The results of ongoing trials will help to establish the ideal tailored approach in resectable rectal cancer.


2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 447-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amandeep Pooni ◽  
Eisar Al-Sukhni ◽  
Laurent Milot ◽  
Mark Fruitman ◽  
J. Charles Victor ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 570-570
Author(s):  
Monique Maas ◽  
Doenja MJ Lambregts ◽  
Freek Gillissen ◽  
Sanne ME Engelen ◽  
Max J Lahaye ◽  
...  

570 Background: 20% of rectal cancer patients have metastatic lymph nodes outside the mesorectum (EMRs). These EMR node positives are associated with poor prognosis. Accurate selection would help to tailor treatment and improve prognosis for these patients. Methods: Rectal cancer patients were included in a study in which treatment was based on (contrast-enhanced) MRI. EMR-status was predicted by an expert radiologist. Based on this prediction patients underwent chemoradiation (CRT) of the EMRs. 6-8 weeks after CRT EMRs were restaged. If still involved, the EMRs were resected. When the EMRs were sterilised by the CRT, they were not resected. Patients were followed 3 to 6-monthly after surgery by a combination of modalities. 3-year outcome was estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: 50 patients with suspected EMRs were included. Median follow-up was 26(0-50) months. In 13 patients EMRs were resected after CRT and in only 2/13 positive nodes were found. Of the remaining 37 patients 5 had a local recurrence (LR). In total 32+11=43 patients (86%) had no involved EMRs after CRT. Five patients had metastasis of whom 2 also had a LR. 3-year LR was 2.3%, 3-year DFS was 86% and 3-year OS was 90%. Conclusions: MRI-based selection of patients with EMRs for CRT provides adequate local control. Distant metastasis is the main cause of poor prognosis in these patients. When MRI is used for EMR identification and thus for identification of patients who need CRT also on the obturator regions, patients can be spared an extensive resection with associated morbidity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document