113. Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours with liver metastases and resection of the primary: Prognostic factors for decision making

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. S52-S53
Author(s):  
E. Bertani ◽  
A. Chiappa ◽  
M. Falconi ◽  
F. Spada ◽  
C. Ferrari ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 58-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilio Bertani ◽  
Massimo Falconi ◽  
Chiara Grana ◽  
Edoardo Botteri ◽  
Antonio Chiappa ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 906-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
K G Samsom ◽  
L M van Veenendaal ◽  
G D Valk ◽  
M R Vriens ◽  
M E T Tesselaar ◽  
...  

Background Small-intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (SI-NETs) represent a heterogeneous group of rare tumours. In recent years, basic research in SI-NETs has attempted to unravel the molecular events underlying SI-NET tumorigenesis. Aim We aim to provide an overview of the current literature regarding prognostic and predictive molecular factors in patients with SI-NETs. Method A PubMed search was conducted on (epi)genetic prognostic factors in SI-NETs from 2000 until 2019. Results The search yielded 1522 articles of which 20 reviews and 35 original studies were selected for further evaluation. SI-NETs are mutationally quiet tumours with a different genetic make-up compared to pancreatic NETs. Loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 18 is the most frequent genomic aberration (44–100%) followed by mutations of CDKN1B in 8%. Prognostic analyses were performed in 16 studies, of which 8 found a significant (epi)genetic association for survival or progression. Loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 18, gains of chromosome 4, 5, 7, 14 and 20p, copy gain of the SRC gene and low expression of RASSF1A and P16 were associated with poorer survival. In comparison with genetic mutations, epigenetic alterations are significantly more common in SI-NETs and may represent more promising targets in the treatment of SI-NETs. Conclusion SI-NETs are mutationally silent tumours. No biomarkers have been identified yet that can easily be adopted into current clinical decision making. SI-NETs may represent a heterogeneous disease and larger international studies are warranted to translate molecular findings into precision oncology.


BJS Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 345-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Eriksson ◽  
J. E. H. Garmo ◽  
C. Ihre-Lundgren ◽  
P. Hellman

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Alabraba ◽  
Heman Joshi ◽  
Andrea Tufo ◽  
Hassan Malik ◽  
Melissa Banks ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 443
Author(s):  
Anela Blažević ◽  
Tessa Brabander ◽  
Wouter T. Zandee ◽  
Johannes Hofland ◽  
Gaston J. H. Franssen ◽  
...  

Background: A metastatic mesenteric mass is a hallmark of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (SI-NETs). However, little is known on its development over time. Therefore, we conducted a study to assess the evolution of a SI-NET-associated mesenteric mass over time. Methods: Retrospectively, 530 patients with proven SI-NET were included. The presence and growth of a mesenteric mass was assessed using RECIST 1.1 criteria on every consecutive CT-scan until the end of follow-up or resection. Results: At baseline, a mesenteric mass was present in 64% of the patients, of whom 13.5% showed growth of the mesenteric mass with a median time to growth of 40 months. Male gender was the only independent predictor of growth (OR 2.67). Of the patients without a mesenteric mass at the first evaluation, 2.6% developed a pathological mesenteric mass. Treatment with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT; N = 132) resulted in an objective size reduction of the mesenteric mass in 3.8%. Conclusion: The metastatic mesenteric mass in SI-NETs has a static behavior over time. Therefore, site-specific growth behavior should be taken into account when selecting target lesions and assessing disease progression and therapeutic response. PRRT appears not to be effective for size reduction of the mesenteric mass.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S159-S160
Author(s):  
M. Gomez-Randulfe Rodriguez ◽  
B. Alonso de Castro ◽  
E. Castro Lopez ◽  
M. Maestro Duran ◽  
S. Silva Diaz ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1141
Author(s):  
Gianpaolo Marte ◽  
Andrea Tufo ◽  
Francesca Steccanella ◽  
Ester Marra ◽  
Piera Federico ◽  
...  

Background: In the last 10 years, the management of patients with gastric cancer liver metastases (GCLM) has changed from chemotherapy alone, towards a multidisciplinary treatment with liver surgery playing a leading role. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of hepatectomy for GCLM and to analyze the impact of related prognostic factors on long-term outcomes. Methods: The databases PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles from January 2010 to September 2020. We included prospective and retrospective studies that reported the outcomes after hepatectomy for GCLM. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of prognostic factors was performed. Results: We included 40 studies, including 1573 participants who underwent hepatic resection for GCLM. Post-operative morbidity and 30-day mortality rates were 24.7% and 1.6%, respectively. One-year, 3-years, and 5-years overall survival (OS) were 72%, 37%, and 26%, respectively. The 1-year, 3-years, and 5-years disease-free survival (DFS) were 44%, 24%, and 22%, respectively. Well-moderately differentiated tumors, pT1–2 and pN0–1 adenocarcinoma, R0 resection, the presence of solitary metastasis, unilobar metastases, metachronous metastasis, and chemotherapy were all strongly positively associated to better OS and DFS. Conclusion: In the present study, we demonstrated that hepatectomy for GCLM is feasible and provides benefits in terms of long-term survival. Identification of patient subgroups that could benefit from surgical treatment is mandatory in a multidisciplinary setting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document