Approximate limit load evaluation of structural frames using linear elastic analysis

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia C. Marin-Artieda ◽  
Gary F. Dargush
2000 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 427-430
Author(s):  
P. Carter

A finite element implementation of rapid cycle analysis is described and demonstrated. It forms part of a comprehensive framework for static structural analysis which consists of: linear elastic analysis, limit load or nonlinear elastic analysis, and rapid cycle analysis. This approach allows for complex material and loading behavior, but is computationally more efficient and easier to perform than full inelastic analysis. It indicates more complex behavior than can be inferred from linear elastic analysis. The objective of this paper is to calculate shakedown, reverse plasticity, ratcheting, and the increase in strain rate as a result of cyclic mechanical and thermal loading. Results are presented in the form of interaction diagrams, similar to the O’Donnell-Porowski plot in the ASME BPV Code, which are effective design tools. [S0094-9930(00)01604-8]


2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Hari Manoj Simha ◽  
Reza Adibi-Asl

It is shown that the extended variational theorem of Mura et al. (1965, “Extended Theorems of Limit Analysis,” Q. Appl. Math., 23(2), pp. 171–179) can be applied to structures subjected to more than one load and be used to compute lower bound limit load multipliers. In particular, the multiplier proposed by Simha and Adibi-Asl (2011, “Lower Bound Limit Load Estimation Using a Linear Elastic Analysis,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 134(2), p. 021207), which can be computed using an elastic stress field, is shown to be a lower bound. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that lower bound limit load for cracked structures may also be computed using a subvolume selection method. No iterations or elastic modulus adjustment are required. Several analytical and numerical examples that illustrate the procedure are presented.


Author(s):  
Michael A. Porter ◽  
Steven R. Massey ◽  
Dennis H. Martens

The analyses address a nominal 62-inch diameter nozzle in a nominal 124-inch diameter shell with a reinforcement pad. The nozzle is in a channel of a heat exchanger. This results in stiffening of the shell (adjacent to the nozzle) by the tube sheet and the channel head. The results of a WRC 297 analysis, linear elastic analysis, limit load analysis and plastic analysis are compared. The finite element analyses were accomplished utilizing commercial software and typical modeling techniques. As there is significant variance in the results derived with the different methodologies, the authors discuss the comparison of the results.


Author(s):  
R. Adibi-Asl ◽  
M. M. Hossain ◽  
S. L. Mahmood ◽  
P. S. R. Gudimetla ◽  
R. Seshadri

Limit loads for pressure components are determined on the basis of a single linear elastic finite element analysis by invoking the concept of kinematically active (reference) volume in the context of the “mα-tangent” method. The resulting technique enables rapid determination of lower bound limit load for pressure components by eliminating the kinematically inactive volume. This method is applied to a number of practical components with different percentages of inactive volume. The results are compared with the corresponding inelastic finite element results, or available analytical solutions.


2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Hari Manoj Simha ◽  
R. Adibi-Asl

We present a scheme that utilizes one elastic stress field (no iterations) to compute lower bound limit load multipliers of structures that collapse through gross (or localized) plasticity. A criterion to distinguish between these collapse modes is presented. For structures that collapse through gross plasticity, we demonstrate that the m′ multiplier proposed by Mura et al. (1965, Extended Theorems of Limit Analysis,” Q. Appl. Math., 23(2), pp. 171–179) is a lower bound in the context of deformation theory. For structures that undergo plastic localization at collapse, we present a criterion that identifies (approximately) the subvolumes of the structure that participate in the collapse. Multiplier m′ is computed over the selected subvolumes, denoted as m'S, and demonstrated to be a lower bound multiplier in the context of deformation theory. We consider numerical examples of structures that collapse by localized or gross plasticity and show that our proposed multiplier is lower than the corresponding multiplier obtained through elastic–plastic analysis and the proposed multiplier is not overly conservative.


Author(s):  
Michael L. Stewart ◽  
Kenneth W. Chase

While variation analysis methods for compliant assemblies are becoming established, there is still much to be done to model the effects of multi-step, fixtured assembly processes statistically. A new method is introduced for statistically analyzing compliant part assembly processes using fixtures. This method yields both a mean and a variant solution, which can characterize an entire population of assemblies. The method, called Piecewise-Linear Elastic Analysis, or PLEA, is developed for predicting the residual stress, deformation and springback variation resulting from fixtured assembly processes. A comprehensive, step-by-step analysis map is presented for introducing dimensional and surface variations into a finite element model, simulating assembly operations, and calculating the error in the final assembly. PLEA is validated on a simple, laboratory assembly and a more complex, production assembly. Significant modeling issues are resolved as well as the comparison of the analytical to physical results.


Author(s):  
Ye-Chen Lai ◽  
Timothy C. S. Liang ◽  
Zhenxue Jia

Abstract Based on hierarchic shape functions and an effective convergence procedure, the p-version and h-p adaptive analysis capabilities were incorporated into a finite element software system, called COSMOS/M. The range of the polynomial orders can be varied from 1 to 10 for two dimensional linear elastic analysis. In the h-p adaptive analysis process, a refined mesh are first achieved via adaptive h-refinement. The p-refinement is then added on to the h-version designed mesh by uniformly increasing the degree of the polynomials. Some numerical results computed by COSMOS/M are presented to illustrate the performance of these p and h-p analysis capabilities.


2019 ◽  
Vol 201 ◽  
pp. 109848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Xie ◽  
Chang He ◽  
Bin Jiang ◽  
Zhenyu Yang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document