Assessment and Treatment of Nocturia in Neurological Disease in a Primary Care Setting: Systematic Review and Nominal Group Technique Consensus

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine A.M. van Merode ◽  
Shoba Dawson ◽  
Elizabeth Coulthard ◽  
Emily J. Henderson ◽  
Claire M. Rice ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Neurological Disease ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Nominal Group Technique ◽  
Nominal Group ◽  
Assessment And Treatment ◽  
Group Technique

Screening questionnaires to identify problem drinking in the primary care setting: a systematic review

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Mueller ◽  
Petra Schumacher ◽  
Jutta Wetzlmair ◽  
Martin Pallauf
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Problem Drinking ◽  
Screening Questionnaires

scholarly journals Consensus Recommendations on the Prehospital Care of the Injured Athlete With a Suspected Catastrophic Cervical Spine Injury

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 563-572
Author(s):  
Brianna M. Mills ◽  
Kelsey M. Conrick ◽  
Scott Anderson ◽  
Julian Bailes ◽  
Barry P. Boden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Cervical Spine Injury ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Athletic Trainers ◽  
Nominal Group Technique ◽  
The United States ◽  
Nominal Group ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Group Technique

Introduction Sports participation is among the leading causes of catastrophic cervical spine injury (CSI) in the United States. Appropriate prehospital care for athletes with suspected CSIs should be available at all levels of sport. The goal of this project was to develop a set of best-practice recommendations appropriate for athletic trainers, emergency responders, sports medicine and emergency physicians, and others engaged in caring for athletes with suspected CSIs. Methods A consensus-driven approach (RAND/UCLA method) in combination with a systematic review of the available literature was used to identify key research questions and develop conclusions and recommendations on the prehospital care of the spine-injured athlete. A diverse panel of experts, including members of the National Athletic Trainers' Association, the National Collegiate Athletic Association, and the Sports Institute at UW Medicine participated in 4 Delphi rounds and a 2-day nominal group technique meeting. The systematic review involved 2 independent reviewers and 4 rounds of blinded review. Results The Delphi process identified 8 key questions to be answered by the systematic review. The systematic review comprised 1544 studies, 49 of which were included in the final full-text review. Using the results of the systematic review as a shared evidence base, the nominal group technique meeting created and refined conclusions and recommendations until consensus was achieved. Conclusions These conclusions and recommendations represent a pragmatic approach, balancing expert experiences and the available scientific evidence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document