Are Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Guided Biopsies Needed in Men with Normal Digital Rectal Examination and Prostatic-specific Antigen >20 ng/ml?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Morote ◽  
Anna Celma ◽  
Jacques Planas
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Prostatic Specific Antigen ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

scholarly journals Histology results of systematic prostate biopsies by in-bore magnetic resonance imaging vs. transrectal ultrasound

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alon Lazarovich ◽  
Gil Raviv ◽  
Yael Laitman ◽  
Orith Portnoy ◽  
Orit Raz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Clinically Significant

Introduction: We aimed to compare systematic biopsies (SBs) of in-bore magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy (MRGpB) with those performed under transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance in the clinical setting. Methods: Data on all 161 consecutive patients undergoing prostate biopsy in our institution between November 2017 and July 2019 were retrospectively collected. The patients were referred to biopsy due to elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination and/or at least one Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) lesion score of ≥3 on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). We included patients with PSA levels ≤20 ng/ml and those with 8–12 core biopsies. Histology results of SBs performed by in-bore MRGpB were compared to TRUS SBs. Chi-squared, Fischer’s exact, and multivariate Pearson regression tests were used for statistical analysis (SPSS, IBM Corporation). Results: In total, 128 patients were eligible for analysis. Their median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 61.5–72), mean prostate size 55±29 cc, and mean PSA and PSA density levels 7.6±3.5 ng/ml and 0.18±0.13 ng/ml/cc, respectively. Thirty-five patients (27.3%) had suspicious digital rectal examination findings. Both biopsy groups were similar for these parameters. Thirty-eight (62.3%) MRGpB patients had a previous biopsy vs. 5 (7.1%) TRUS-SB patients (p<0.0001). The number of patients diagnosed with clinically significant and non-significant disease was similar for both groups. High-risk disease was more prevalent in the TRUS-SB group (22.4% vs. 4.9%, p<0.01). Conclusions: Our data suggest that in-bore MRGpB is no better than TRUS for guiding SBs for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

The decision of targeted, systematic or combined biopsy in a biopsy naïve patient for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, can be made on the basis of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-204
Author(s):  
Debashis Sarkar ◽  
Debashis Nandi ◽  
Sameer Gangoli ◽  
James Hicks ◽  
Paul Carter
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Current Trend ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Naive Patient ◽  
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Introduction: The current trend to implement multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-guided targeted biopsy (TB) as primary biopsy for the diagnosis of suspected prostate cancer and to avoid systematic biopsy (SB) is growing. However, concern remains regarding missing clinically significant (Cs) cancer on the normal mpMRI areas of the prostate. Therefore, we compared the normal and abnormal areas from mpMRI at the same prostate biopsy, using simultaneous SB and TB technique. Methods: A prospective, comparative effectiveness study included 134 patients initially referred for primary biopsy (from October 2017 to June 2018); 100 men were selected, mean age 68 years, with a median level of prostate specific antigen of 7.6, with average prostate volume of 52 cm3 (T3 disease and prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score < 3 were excluded). All underwent six cores TB (median), from an average of two lesions on mpMRI and also eight cores SB (median) from normal mpMRI areas of the prostate after informed consent. Results: The combined (SB + TB) biopsy cancer detection rate was 67%, 51% having Cs disease. For Cs cancer, 35 patients were detected by both techniques. TB missed four Cs cancer (95% confidence interval (CI), p < 0.0001). Fewer men in the TB group than in the SB group were found to have clinically insignificant (Ci) cancer (95% CI, p < 0.0001). No Cs cancer diagnosis was missed on TB from PI-RADS 5 lesion. Overall, 4% Cs cancers were missed on TB and avoided over diagnosis of 9% Ci cancer. Conclusions: Cognitive TB didn’t miss any Cs cancer from PI-RADS 5 lesion found on mpMRI. Only doing Cognitive TB on PI-RADS 5 lesion would save time, reduce workload and will be cost effective both for Urology and Pathology. PI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions on mpMRI will benefit from adding systematic samples. Level of evidence: 4 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM).

Incorporating Androgen Deprivation With Dose-Escalated External-Beam Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15) ◽  
pp. 1718-1722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arie P. Dosoretz ◽  
James B. Yu
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Morbidly Obese ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Normal Prostate ◽  
Rectal Examination

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors’ suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice. A 71-year-old man was seen by his primary care physician for routine evaluation in early 2015. On digital rectal examination, his prostate was moderately enlarged, although he had no obvious areas of palpable disease. His prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 7.1 ng/mL. A standard ultrasound-guided biopsy of his prostate revealed a 60-mL prostate volume and a single core (out of 12) of Gleason 3 + 3 disease. He chose to undergo surveillance. Six months later, his PSA level had risen to 10.0 ng/mL; there was still no palpable disease on digital rectal examination. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of his prostate and pelvis revealed two suspicious intraprostatic lesions with restricted diffusion, focal and earlier enhancement with contrast than adjacent normal prostate, and hypointense features on T2-weighted imaging; these findings were highly suspicious for high-grade prostate cancer ( Fig 1 ). Magnetic resonance imaging–ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy of each lesion yielded a total of four positive biopsy cores of Gleason 4 + 3 = 7, involving 50% to 80% of each core, with perineural invasion noted. The patient’s medical history is notable for overweight (but not morbidly obese), hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, cataract surgeries, and inguinal hernia repair, but the patient is otherwise healthy. He has decided against prostatectomy and brachytherapy because of strong personal preference. In particular, he wanted to avoid anesthesia, and was concerned about the potential for greater urinary incontinence and/or urinary irritation associated with these treatments compared with external-beam radiotherapy (RT). 1 , 2

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document