WHOLE EXOME SEQUENCING REVEALS RISK FACTORS IN TREATMENT RESISTANT DEPRESSION

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. S934-S935
Author(s):  
Alessandro Serretti ◽  
Chiara Fabbri ◽  
Diego Albani ◽  
Siegfried Kasper ◽  
Joseph Zohar ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Fabbri ◽  
Siegfried Kasper ◽  
Alexander Kautzky ◽  
Joseph Zohar ◽  
Daniel Souery ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Fabbri ◽  
Siegfried Kasper ◽  
Alexander Kautzky ◽  
Joseph Zohar ◽  
Daniel Souery ◽  
...  

AbstractTreatment-resistant depression (TRD) occurs in ∼30% of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) but the genetics of TRD was previously poorly investigated.Whole exome sequencing and genome-wide genotyping were performed in 1320 MDD patients. Response to the first pharmacological treatment was compared to non-response to one treatment and non-response to two or more treatments (TRD). Differences in the risk of carrying damaging variants were tested. A score expressing the burden of variants in genes and pathways was calculated weighting each variant for its functional (Eigen) score and frequency, considering rare variants only and rare + common variants. Gene- and pathway-based scores were used to develop predictive models of TRD and non-response using gradient boosting in 70% of the sample (training) which were tested in the remaining 30% (testing), evaluating also the addition of clinical predictors. Independent replication was tested in STAR*D and GENDEP using exome array-based data.After quality control 1209 subjects were included. TRD and non-responders did not show higher risk to carry damaging variants compared to responders. Genes/pathways associated with TRD included those modulating cell survival and proliferation, neurodegeneration and immune response. Significant prediction of TRD vs. response was observed in the testing sample which was improved by the addition of clinical factors. Some models were replicated, with a weaker prediction, in STAR*D and GENDEP when considering also clinical factors and in the extremes of the genetic score distribution.These results suggested relevant biological mechanisms implicated in TRD and a new methodological approach to the prediction of TRD.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. S1166-S1167
Author(s):  
Chiara Fabbri ◽  
Siegfried Kasper ◽  
Alexander Kautzky ◽  
Joseph Zohar ◽  
Daniel Souery ◽  
...  

Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (27) ◽  
pp. 43752-43767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachid Abaji ◽  
Vincent Gagné ◽  
Chang Jiang Xu ◽  
Jean-François Spinella ◽  
Francesco Ceppi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 261 ◽  
pp. 221-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederikke Hordam Gronemann ◽  
Martin Balslev Jorgensen ◽  
Merete Nordentoft ◽  
Per Kragh Andersen ◽  
Merete Osler

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 020338
Author(s):  
Olena Khaustova

Background Therapy of resistant depression raises a number of diagnostic and therapeutic problems, requires the solution of a number of methodological issues. A scientific discussion continues around the definition of depression resistance, assessment of the degree of reduction of depressive symptoms, the level of social and role functioning of patients; the improvement of models for determining the degree of resistance to various types of depression therapy continues; new methods of therapy and new algorithms of combined therapy are being developed. The ultimate goal of all these efforts should be practical recommendations for determining therapeutic options for the treatment of patients with resistant depression, which will help doctors make informed decisions on intervention strategies. Aim To analyze the therapeutic possibilities of treating depressive disorders that are resistant to therapy. Methods Publications from the Pubmed, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar databases were analyzed. Tags: depression, treatment, resistance, psevdoresistence, therapeutic response, resistance to treatment, strategies for treatment of resistant depression. Results The terminology related to resistant depression was defined: lack of a therapeutic response, adequate dose, adequate duration of treatment, antidepressant intolerance, pseudo-resistance, relative resistance to treatment, absolute resistance to treatment, treatment of resistant depression, remission, recovery. Models for determining the resistance of depression have been described: the Thase & Rush model; European stepped model; A step model of the Massachusetts hospital; Step model of Maudsley; Form of the history of treatment with antidepressants. Risk factors for treatment of resistant depression were identified, and the main therapeutic strategies were described: optimization, switching, augmentation, combination and non-drug therapy. Particular attention is paid to the use of atypical antipsychotics, in particular arapiprazole, as the augmentation strategy. A complex approach is described, which includes various combinations of the above strategies. Conclusion Each case of treatment-resistant depression has its own unique characteristics and requires careful evaluation to determine the correct diagnosis and the quality of the therapeutic response. Equally important for building an adequate treatment plan is evaluating risk factors for the treatment of resistant depression. There is a wide variety of options for the treatment of resistant depression, so each therapeutic strategy should be used to help patients with treatment-resistant depression. The combination of antidepressant therapy and atypical antipsychotics with antidepressant properties in combination with psychotherapeutic intervention and adherence to adequate doses and duration of treatment may be a choice strategy for patients with treatment-resistant depression.


2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 16 ◽  
pp. 2539-2551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Szarmach ◽  
Wiesław Jerzy Cubała ◽  
Adam Włodarczyk ◽  
Maria Gałuszko-Węgielnik

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document