scholarly journals Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Which Position? Supine Position!

2022 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Guido Giusti ◽  
Maria P. Pavia ◽  
Luis Rico ◽  
Silvia Proietti
2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 214-220
Author(s):  
J.H. Amón ◽  
D. Pérez Fentes ◽  
L. Resel ◽  
J.A. Galán ◽  
A. Serrano ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esam A.E. Desoky ◽  
Mohammed N. Allam ◽  
Mostafa K. Ammar ◽  
Khaled M. Abdelwahab ◽  
Diab A. Elsaid ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 26-27
Author(s):  
N.Dhinakar Babu ◽  
D.Mohan Kumar

Supine PCNL (Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy) is an Alternative to traditional prone positioning. Benets of the supine position include easy access to the airway and Optimization of cardiopulmonary function in patients. This is a prospective study which analyzes the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in supine position. There were totally 50 patients included in the study. 27 were male and 23 female patients. Mean age was 43 years, ranging from 18 to 70 years. Right side stones seen in 60% of cases ( 30/50). Average stone size was 2.6cm ranging from 1.8 to 6cm. Average operating time were 63.5 minutes and uroscopy 18.9 minutes (5 to 35 minutes). Clearance rate in our study were pretty good with 90% (45 out of 50 cases). Five patients required secondary procedures and ve had complications in form of sepsis and bleeding requiring blood transfusion. There were no visceral injury or srtula. Thus Supine PCNL has several potential advantages with successful technical feasibility and can be used to treat all stone sizes especially very effective in high risk patients for anesthesia. There is no added risk in this technique, and the stone clearance and complication rates are comparable to standard prone PCNL


2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
SalahA El Hamshary ◽  
EhabM El Barky ◽  
MostafaM Mostafa ◽  
AshrafM Abd El Al ◽  
MohammedA Hassanine

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Esam Desoky ◽  
Khaled M. Abd Elwahab ◽  
Islam M. El-Babouly ◽  
Mohammed M. Seleem

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the flank-free modified supine position. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> A prospective study was carried out in the urology department during the period from May 2015 to October 2019 on 464 patients admitted for PCNL. The patients were divided into 4 matched groups according to their BMI: group A, normal weight with 18.5 ≤ BMI &#x3c;25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; group B, overweight with 25 ≤ BMI &#x3c;30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; group C, obese with 30 ≤ BMI &#x3c;40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; and group D, morbid obesity with BMI ≥40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. All operative data as well as postoperative outcomes are recorded and compared to each other. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The 4 studied groups were matched regarding age. The comorbidities were slightly higher in groups C and D. The operative time and fluoroscopy time were slightly high in obese and morbid obese groups but with no significant difference. The rate of complications either major or minor was comparable in all groups. No significant difference was seen among all groups regarding hemoglobin loss, stone-free rate, hospital stay, and need for auxiliary procedures. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The outcome of PCNL in flank-free modified supine position is not affected by changes in BMI. The procedure can be performed in obese and morbid obese patients safely with results similar to and comparable to nonobese patients.


2012 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Bach ◽  
A. Goyal ◽  
P. Kumar ◽  
S. Kachrilas ◽  
A.G. Papatsoris ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. e2769
Author(s):  
C. Aliaga Ayuni ◽  
L. Ladaria Sureda ◽  
J. Bauzà Quetglas ◽  
I. Coello Torà ◽  
M. Peraire Lores ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document