The Portuguese Mental Health Law –the Criteria for Compulsory Internment

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S489-S489
Author(s):  
H. Prata-Ribeiro

The Portuguese Mental Health Law is complex, aiming to ensure patients liberties and basic civil rights are respected. A specific part of this law regards the compulsory internment and its criteria, being as protective as possible, in order to prevent wrongful internments for people against their will.The aim of this study is to analyze the mechanisms available to ensure liberty, in a law apparently about coercion.The methods used consisted in analyzing the law and interpreting its most important details, mentioning them so they can be read and used as examples.It can be concluded that the Portuguese law has a very strict list of mandatory criteria for the possibility of the compulsory internment, as a way of ensuring no people suffer it wrongfully. The most important being that no person can be interned compulsory if not considered to suffer from a severe mental disease, not being that enough and having to at least present risk for themselves or others, or to juridical goods of high value. Thus, revaluation of the patient is mandatory only five days after the internment by two different doctors, being the same process assured from then on every two months. Only possible flaw lays on the fact that there is no maximum amount of time predicted for internment, being that always dependent of the revaluations made. Although, the law is considered to be good and prevent abusive use of the compulsory internments.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 629-631
Author(s):  
Susan Herrick

The Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law (the Center), founded as the Mental Health Law Project by a group of attorneys and mental health professionals, has been a major advocacy force promoting the civil rights of persons with mental disabilities since the 1972 New York Willowbrook litigation.Named for D. C. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge David L. Bazelon, whose opinions first articulated the principles that the mentally disabled have a right to treatment in the least restrictive alternative setting, the Center has actively pursued greater rights for the mentally disabled in housing, education, and federal entitlements such as Medicaid, as well as in treatment-related issues.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-12
Author(s):  
A. Douzenis ◽  
C. Tsopelas ◽  
L. Lykouras

Like all European countries, Greece has developed its national legislation based on the principles of equality and the right of representation, but there is no separate, specific mental health law in Greece. This paper describes the law for involuntary psychiatric admission. The law concerning criminal and civil responsibility and the law relating to individuals with addictions committing drug-related crimes are also outlined.


Author(s):  
John Horne

In the third week of June, the Law Society and the Royal College of Psychiatrists jointly hosted a very well attended two-day conference on reform of mental health law (day one) and the law relating to mental incapacity (day two), entitled ‘Make up your mind’. What emerged both from the presentations and from questions and comments ‘from the floor’, was widespread and strong opposition to many of the mental health legislative reform proposals set out in the White Paper of December 2000, and equally widespread and strong support for long-awaited legislation in the field of mental incapacity. The following week the Draft Mental Health Bill was published.<br />However a Mental Incapacity Bill would still appear to be some way off.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 231-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian McKenna ◽  
Katey Thom ◽  
Anthony O'Brien ◽  
Sally Crene ◽  
Alexander Simpson

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (10) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Paul Bowen

In ‘Almost a Revolution: Mental Health Law and the Limits of Change’, Prof. Paul Applebaum, writing in 1994, describes a period of tumultuous change in the United States during the late 1960s in civil rights and mental health law and which lasted nearly three decades. At the end of that period, he concluded, there had been little real and substantial change to mental health law in the United States. This article looks at some of the changes to mental health law that have already been wrought in England &amp; Wales by the Human Rights Act 1998 and briefly considers its potential for creating real and substantial change in the longer term.


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 94-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidija Injac Stevovic ◽  
Tatijana Perunovic Jovanovic ◽  
Aleksandra Raznatovic

This paper discusses the services and treatments that are offered in Montenegro to persons who are mentally ill. A short history is given. The law on the protection of the rights of patients who are mentally ill is described, along with the regulations governing voluntary and forced treatment. An action plan for promoting mental health has been partly already realised but some of its aims still need to be accomplished.


Author(s):  
Paula Murphy ◽  
Tim Exworthy

Mental health law is concerned with the legislation governing the man­agement and treatment of people with a mental disorder. It includes the detention and treatment of patients and covers consent to treatment, mental capacity, deprivation of liberty, human rights, and ethical issues. The law is necessary to safeguard the interests of the patients and also to protect the public from potentially serious harm from a mentally disordered offender. It is crucial that mental health practitioners under­stand the relevant legislation to ensure that they are practising within the realms of the law and also so that they can offer help and advice to patients and carers if required to do so. Mental health legislation is constantly evolving and there are always challenges and changes to existing legislation, so practitioners need to keep up to date with new statutory legislation and case law. An example of this is the Mental Health Act (MHA) 1983, which was amended by the MHA 2007, and amended again by the Health and Social Care Act 2012. In addition, the Mental Capacity Act 2005 was a new statute which came into force in 2007, alongside Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. There are Codes of Practice for the MHA, the Mental Capacity Act, and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. These provide supplemen­tary guidance on good practice. Mental health practitioners need to take account of the Codes of Practice in their work. Mental health law can be a complex and challenging area, even for the most knowledgeable and experienced practitioners. Most organizations will have an MHA administrator and/or a legal advisor who can provide advice and guidance in matters of uncertainty.


PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen L. Golding

1981 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 926-928
Author(s):  
Steven Wallach

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document