The treatment of “shell shock” in World War 1: Early attitudes and treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder and combat stress reaction

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S636-S636
Author(s):  
H. Matson

Combat stress reaction is a mental health disorder first documented in the latter half of the 19th century. But it was not until World War 1 when men were put through the horrific ordeals of trench warfare that the term, “shell shocked” was coined. Many soldiers with shell shock then developed what is now called post-traumatic stress disorder (though the term was not defined until 1983) or acute stress disorder. The prevailing opinion was that these men who had often not suffered from any physical trauma were sufferers of cowardice. The British army created the PIE (proximity, immediacy, and expectancy) principles to get such men back to the trenches promptly where manpower was always needed. It was rarely regarded as a real psychiatric condition, which had two consequences. Firstly, that many soldiers progressed from shell shock to post-traumatic stress disorder and secondly, over 150 soldiers were executed by the British army for, “displaying cowardice” whilst in the grip of the illness. The diagnosis of “shell shock” was to be made increasingly frequently as wars became larger and more mechanized throughout the 20th century. Psychiatrists’ management of such patients initially was primitive and influenced by the zeitgeist that such servicemen were not ill, having never come across such a widespread prevalence of mental health problems until the Great War. These ranged from prescriptions of milk to lobotomies. Understanding how “shell shock” was understood, treated and learning from the mistakes made then, continues to inform management of our patients today.Disclosure of interestThe author has not supplied his/her declaration of competing interest.

1987 ◽  
Vol 151 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Garb ◽  
I. Kutz ◽  
A. Bleich ◽  
Z. Solomon

The use of an immunological metaphor allows the incorporation of established theoretical ideas about trauma and stress in an integrative way which enables delineation and illustration of several varieties of combat stress reaction, including subtle forms of that condition which do not often appear in post-traumatic stress disorder literature.


1989 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 927-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahava Solomon

SYNOPSISThis study assessed the clinical picture of two groups of Israeli veterans of the Lebanon war: (a) veterans who sustained a combat stress reaction (CSR) (N = 213), and (b) matched controls not so diagnosed (N = 116). Subjects were screened at three points – one, two, and three years after their participation in the war. The results indicated that Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was correlated with a wider range of general psychiatric symptomatology, as measured by the SCL-90. Moreover, among PTSD veterans, those who suffered from an antecedent CSR reported wider and more severe symptomatology. This trend was observed at all three time points. The most salient symptoms were obsessive-compulsive tendencies and anxiety, followed by depression and hostility.


2021 ◽  
pp. 0957154X2110519
Author(s):  
AD (Sandy) Macleod

Prominent English neurologist Sir Charles Symonds, during World War II service with the Royal Air Force, published a series of articles emphasizing the role of fear initiating psychological breakdown in combat airmen (termed Lack of Moral Fibre). Having served in a medical capacity in the previous war, Symonds re-presented the phylogenetic conceptualizations formed by his colleagues addressing ‘shell shock’. In 2013, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) re-classified Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), removing the diagnosis from the category of Anxiety Disorders. This was the view introduced a century ago by the trench doctors of World War I and affirmed by Symonds’ clinical experience and studies in World War II.


2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 187-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Favaro ◽  
Elena Tenconi ◽  
Giovanni Colombo ◽  
Paolo Santonastaso

Author(s):  
Lawrence Tritle

This chapter investigates the issue of landpower from a demographic perspective, exploring the realities of military manpower in a time when fewer than 1 percent of the American people serve in uniform. Since 9/11, the United States has deployed in combat situations this minority of the population in Afghanistan and Iraq, where thousands have been exposed to a new-age weapon of choice, the IED, the Improvised Explosive Device. Many hundreds have been killed or maimed for life. Many thousands more have suffered debilitating, if not life-changing, head and brain injuries. The latest generation of diagnostic tools now available to medical professionals, magnetic resonance imaging, makes clear the catastrophic damage such weapons inflict on the human brain. These findings have enhanced the scientific and popular understanding of the nature of post-traumatic stress disorder, and such precursors as Combat Fatigue, Shell Shock, and Soldier's Heart. The lingering question remains the extent to which the USgovernment and the governed will recognize and act on the revealed science.


1996 ◽  
Vol 161 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula P. Schnurr ◽  
Matthew J. Friedman ◽  
Bonnie L. Green

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document