The Ongoing Need for Improved Risk Stratification and Monitoring for Those on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 1032-1033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Welty ◽  
Peter R. Carroll
2019 ◽  
Vol 201 (Supplement 4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mufaddal Mamawala* ◽  
Alexa Meyer ◽  
Patricia Landis ◽  
Katarzyna Macura ◽  
Jonathan Epstein ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 95-95
Author(s):  
Jinping Xu ◽  
Arun Mallapareddi ◽  
Julie Ruterbusch ◽  
Elyse Reamer ◽  
Susan Eggly

95 Background: Despite growing recognition over the last decade that active surveillance (AS) is a reasonable management option for men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (LPC), only a minority of men choose AS. This study examines the conceptualizations, experiences, and reasons for choosing AS among men with LPC and their partners. Methods: We conducted three focus groups with men with LPC who had chosen AS (7 black, 5 white) and two focus groups with their partners (all women, 2 black, 4 white). Men were identified from a cancer registry or from an academic urologists’ practice. Focus groups were video/audio recorded, transcribed and analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis. Results: Men’s median time on AS was 18 months (range 6-72) and median age was 61 years (range 47-71). Men used many different terms (mostly “wait and see”) to describe similar AS protocols. AS was seen as delaying unnecessary treatment and keeping current function with curable treatment available later if needed. Black men mentioned concerns that some physicians profit by providing unnecessary treatments. Reasons for choosing AS included seeing their cancer as “small” or “low-risk” and trusting their physician’s advice/monitoring, despite reported concerns about PSA being an unreliable test and painful biopsies. Men recognized, but were comfortable with, the small but real threat their cancer could grow. Men found they had to justify their choice to other family members, even when their partners were supportive. Partners saw themselves as very involved and influential in the treatment decision. They were comfortable with AS because of their trust in physicians. Partners believed they know their husband’s physical and mental health better than the men themselves. Conclusions: Physician trust and description of the cancer as low-risk were the most cited reasons for adopting AS. Emphasizing the low-risk nature of the cancer and enhancing physician trust may increase the acceptability of AS.


2020 ◽  
Vol 204 (6) ◽  
pp. 1216-1221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Lonergan ◽  
Samuel L. Washington ◽  
Janet E. Cowan ◽  
Shoujun Zhao ◽  
Hao G. Nguyen ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 192 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Filson ◽  
Florian R. Schroeck ◽  
Zaojun Ye ◽  
John T. Wei ◽  
Brent K. Hollenbeck ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document