Evaluation of the relationship of corneal biomechanical metrics with physical intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness in ex vivo rabbit eye globes

2015 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 11-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
FangJun Bao ◽  
ManLi Deng ◽  
QinMei Wang ◽  
JinHai Huang ◽  
Jing Yang ◽  
...  
SciVee ◽  
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pouya Alaghband ◽  
Evgenia Kanonidou ◽  
Laura Beltran-Agullo ◽  
Darryl R. Overby ◽  
K Sheng Lim

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 563-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masato Matsuura ◽  
Hiroshi Murata ◽  
Yuri Fujino ◽  
Mieko Yanagisawa ◽  
Yoshitaka Nakao ◽  
...  

AimsCorvis ST (CST) yields biomechanical corrected IOP (bIOP) which is purported to be less dependent on biomechanical properties. In our accompanied paper, it was suggested that the repeatability of bIOP is high. The purpose of the current study was to assess the relationship between intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with CST and central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal hysteresis (CH), in comparison with IOP measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and the ocular response analyzer (ORA).MethodsA total of 141 eyes from 141 subjects (35 healthy eyes and 106 glaucomatous eyes) underwent IOP measurements with GAT, CST and ORA. The relationships between IOP measurements (ORA-IOPg, ORA-IOPcc, CST-bIOP and GAT IOP) and biomechanical properties (CCT, CH and corneal resistance factor (CRF)) were analysed using the linear regression analysis.ResultsIOPg, IOPcc and GAT IOP were significantly associated with CCT (p<0.001), whereas bIOP was not significantly associated with CCT (p=0.19). IOPg, bIOP and GAT IOP were significantly associated with CH (IOPg: p<0.001; bIOP: p<0.001; GAT IOP: p=0.0054), whereas IOPcc was not significantly associated with CH (p=0.18). All of IOP records were associated with CRF (p<0.001).ConclusionThe bIOP measurement from CST is independent from CCT, but dependent on CH and CRF.


Author(s):  
Nadiah RASHIDI ◽  
Md Muziman Syah MD MUSTAFA ◽  
Norsham AHMAD ◽  
Megat Ahmad Fadhil MEGAT BASRI ◽  
Nor Ariza MOHAMMAD ◽  
...  

Purpose: To study the relationship between intraocular pressure (IOP), posture, and central corneal thickness (CCT) among healthy Malays. Method: Thirty-four young adults had their IOPs measured using a handheld tonometer (Accutome, Pennsylvania, USA) after maintaining 5 min at four different postures; sitting upright, supine, supine & 45° inclination, and prone positions. The sequences of the postures were made random. CCT was measured using Oculus Pentacam (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany), and the value at the corneal apex was taken. Participants were grouped into Group A with CCT of < 550 μm, and Group B of > 550 μm. Results: The highest IOP was recorded at the prone position 23.77±2.71 mmHg (p < 0.001), and the lowest was at sitting upright 15.43±2.67 mmHg (p < 0.001). IOP at the supine position was 17.31±3.07 mmHg, and at the supine & 45° inclination position was 16.00±2.80 mmHg. IOPs were significantly different between sitting upright and supine (p = 0.03), between sitting upright and prone (p < 0.001), between supine and prone (p < 0.001), and between supine & inclined 45° and prone (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in IOPs between Group A and Group B at different postures (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Change in body posture significantly affects IOP, with the lowest IOP during the sitting upright position, and the highest at the prone position. IOP change upon posture shifts was not affected by CCT.


2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pammal T. Ashwin ◽  
Sunil Shah ◽  
Sreekumari Pushpoth ◽  
Louai Wehbeh ◽  
Balasubramaniam Ilango

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document